From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from dpdk.org (dpdk.org [92.243.14.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6028CA04DD for ; Sun, 15 Nov 2020 23:55:56 +0100 (CET) Received: from [92.243.14.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5C12AC8D8; Sun, 15 Nov 2020 23:55:55 +0100 (CET) Received: by dpdk.org (Postfix, from userid 1017) id CD2E0C872; Sun, 15 Nov 2020 23:55:54 +0100 (CET) In-Reply-To: <20201115225320.68408-5-thomas@monjalon.net> References: <20201115225320.68408-5-thomas@monjalon.net> To: test-report@dpdk.org Cc: Thomas Monjalon Message-Id: <20201115225554.CD2E0C872@dpdk.org> Date: Sun, 15 Nov 2020 23:55:54 +0100 (CET) From: checkpatch@dpdk.org Subject: [dpdk-test-report] |WARNING| pw84193 [PATCH v11 4/4] doc: replace usage of blacklist/whitelist X-BeenThere: test-report@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: automatic DPDK test reports List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: test-report-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "test-report" Test-Label: checkpatch Test-Status: WARNING http://dpdk.org/patch/84193 _coding style issues_ WARNING:TYPO_SPELLING: 'blacklist' may be misspelled - perhaps 'blocklist'? #80: Subject: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v11 4/4] doc: replace usage of blacklist/whitelist WARNING:TYPO_SPELLING: 'whitelist' may be misspelled - perhaps 'allowlist'? #80: Subject: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v11 4/4] doc: replace usage of blacklist/whitelist WARNING:TYPO_SPELLING: 'blacklist' may be misspelled - perhaps 'blocklist'? #97: The words blacklist and whitelist are avoided in text WARNING:TYPO_SPELLING: 'whitelist' may be misspelled - perhaps 'allowlist'? #97: The words blacklist and whitelist are avoided in text total: 0 errors, 4 warnings, 68 lines checked