From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <test-report-bounces@dpdk.org>
Received: from mails.dpdk.org (mails.dpdk.org [217.70.189.124])
	by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 79B4EA0A0A
	for <public@inbox.dpdk.org>; Mon,  5 Apr 2021 20:06:06 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from [217.70.189.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6E3BA4068C;
	Mon,  5 Apr 2021 20:06:06 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from dpdk.org (dpdk.org [92.243.24.197])
 by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A52744014E
 for <test-report@dpdk.org>; Mon,  5 Apr 2021 20:06:05 +0200 (CEST)
Received: by dpdk.org (Postfix, from userid 65534)
 id 8CB51120D42; Mon,  5 Apr 2021 20:06:05 +0200 (CEST)
In-Reply-To: <1617645874-105139-1-git-send-email-orika@nvidia.com>
References: <1617645874-105139-1-git-send-email-orika@nvidia.com>
To: test-report@dpdk.org
From: checkpatch@dpdk.org
Cc: Ori Kam <orika@nvidia.com>
Message-Id: <20210405180605.8CB51120D42@dpdk.org>
Date: Mon,  5 Apr 2021 20:06:05 +0200 (CEST)
Subject: [dpdk-test-report] |WARNING| pw90567 [PATCH] ethdev: add packet
 integrity checks
X-BeenThere: test-report@dpdk.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: automatic DPDK test reports <test-report.dpdk.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://mails.dpdk.org/options/test-report>,
 <mailto:test-report-request@dpdk.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://mails.dpdk.org/archives/test-report/>
List-Post: <mailto:test-report@dpdk.org>
List-Help: <mailto:test-report-request@dpdk.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://mails.dpdk.org/listinfo/test-report>,
 <mailto:test-report-request@dpdk.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: test-report-bounces@dpdk.org
Sender: "test-report" <test-report-bounces@dpdk.org>

Test-Label: checkpatch
Test-Status: WARNING
http://dpdk.org/patch/90567

_coding style issues_


WARNING:TYPO_SPELLING: 'currenlty' may be misspelled - perhaps 'currently'?
#62: 
Since currenlty rte_flow works in positive way the assumtion is

WARNING:TYPO_SPELLING: 'assumtion' may be misspelled - perhaps 'assumption'?
#62: 
Since currenlty rte_flow works in positive way the assumtion is

WARNING:TYPO_SPELLING: 'postive' may be misspelled - perhaps 'positive'?
#63: 
that the postive way will be the common way in this case also.

WARNING:TYPO_SPELLING: 'Flexability' may be misspelled - perhaps 'Flexibility'?
#72: 
6. Flexability.

WARNING:TYPO_SPELLING: 'doens' may be misspelled - perhaps 'does'?
#108: 
3. l3_ok - all check flor layer 2 have passed. If packet doens't have

WARNING:TYPO_SPELLING: 'shoudl' may be misspelled - perhaps 'should'?
#109: 
   l3 layer this check shoudl fail.

total: 0 errors, 6 warnings, 83 lines checked