From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <test-report-bounces@dpdk.org>
Received: from mails.dpdk.org (mails.dpdk.org [217.70.189.124])
	by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6D641A0579
	for <public@inbox.dpdk.org>; Thu,  8 Apr 2021 09:29:59 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from [217.70.189.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6630A40698;
	Thu,  8 Apr 2021 09:29:59 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from dpdk.org (dpdk.org [92.243.24.197])
 by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C402940138
 for <test-report@dpdk.org>; Thu,  8 Apr 2021 09:29:57 +0200 (CEST)
Received: by dpdk.org (Postfix, from userid 65534)
 id 98572120D42; Thu,  8 Apr 2021 09:29:57 +0200 (CEST)
In-Reply-To: <20210408072903.8008-1-alvinx.zhang@intel.com>
References: <20210408072903.8008-1-alvinx.zhang@intel.com>
To: test-report@dpdk.org
From: checkpatch@dpdk.org
Cc: Alvin Zhang <alvinx.zhang@intel.com>
Message-Id: <20210408072957.98572120D42@dpdk.org>
Date: Thu,  8 Apr 2021 09:29:57 +0200 (CEST)
Subject: [dpdk-test-report] |WARNING| pw90844 [PATCH] net/e1000: fix max Rx
 packet size
X-BeenThere: test-report@dpdk.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: automatic DPDK test reports <test-report.dpdk.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://mails.dpdk.org/options/test-report>,
 <mailto:test-report-request@dpdk.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://mails.dpdk.org/archives/test-report/>
List-Post: <mailto:test-report@dpdk.org>
List-Help: <mailto:test-report-request@dpdk.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://mails.dpdk.org/listinfo/test-report>,
 <mailto:test-report-request@dpdk.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: test-report-bounces@dpdk.org
Sender: "test-report" <test-report-bounces@dpdk.org>

Test-Label: checkpatch
Test-Status: WARNING
http://dpdk.org/patch/90844

_coding style issues_


WARNING:TYPO_SPELLING: 'Therefor' may be misspelled - perhaps 'Therefore'?
#60: 
one VLAN tag size. Therefor when config RLPML register, if dual VLAN

total: 0 errors, 1 warnings, 0 checks, 38 lines checked