From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <test-report-bounces@dpdk.org>
Received: from mails.dpdk.org (mails.dpdk.org [217.70.189.124])
	by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CD2D0A0C41
	for <public@inbox.dpdk.org>; Fri, 27 Aug 2021 09:01:28 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from [217.70.189.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 21F42411E7;
	Fri, 27 Aug 2021 09:01:28 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from dpdk.org (dpdk.org [92.243.24.197])
 by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 86802410E9
 for <test-report@dpdk.org>; Fri, 27 Aug 2021 09:01:21 +0200 (CEST)
Received: by dpdk.org (Postfix, from userid 65534)
 id 82DA21226B3; Fri, 27 Aug 2021 09:01:21 +0200 (CEST)
In-Reply-To: <20210827065717.1838258-33-andrew.rybchenko@oktetlabs.ru>
References: <20210827065717.1838258-33-andrew.rybchenko@oktetlabs.ru>
To: test-report@dpdk.org
From: checkpatch@dpdk.org
Cc: Andrew Rybchenko <andrew.rybchenko@oktetlabs.ru>
Message-Id: <20210827070121.82DA21226B3@dpdk.org>
Date: Fri, 27 Aug 2021 09:01:21 +0200 (CEST)
Subject: [dpdk-test-report] |WARNING| pw97450 [PATCH 32/38] net/sfc:
 maintain controller to EFX interface mapping
X-BeenThere: test-report@dpdk.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: automatic DPDK test reports <test-report.dpdk.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://mails.dpdk.org/options/test-report>,
 <mailto:test-report-request@dpdk.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://mails.dpdk.org/archives/test-report/>
List-Post: <mailto:test-report@dpdk.org>
List-Help: <mailto:test-report-request@dpdk.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://mails.dpdk.org/listinfo/test-report>,
 <mailto:test-report-request@dpdk.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: test-report-bounces@dpdk.org
Sender: "test-report" <test-report-bounces@dpdk.org>

Test-Label: checkpatch
Test-Status: WARNING
http://dpdk.org/patch/97450

_coding style issues_


WARNING:USE_NEGATIVE_ERRNO: return of an errno should typically be negative (ie: return -ENOMEM)
#112: FILE: drivers/net/sfc/sfc_ethdev.c:1887:
+			return ENOMEM;

WARNING:USE_NEGATIVE_ERRNO: return of an errno should typically be negative (ie: return -ENOMEM)
#134: FILE: drivers/net/sfc/sfc_ethdev.c:1909:
+		return ENOMEM;

WARNING:USE_NEGATIVE_ERRNO: return of an errno should typically be negative (ie: return -EINVAL)
#177: FILE: drivers/net/sfc/sfc_ethdev.c:1952:
+		return EINVAL;

WARNING:USE_NEGATIVE_ERRNO: return of an errno should typically be negative (ie: return -EINVAL)
#182: FILE: drivers/net/sfc/sfc_ethdev.c:1957:
+		return EINVAL;

WARNING:USE_NEGATIVE_ERRNO: return of an errno should typically be negative (ie: return -EINVAL)
#311: FILE: drivers/net/sfc/sfc_switch.c:235:
+		return EINVAL;

WARNING:USE_NEGATIVE_ERRNO: return of an errno should typically be negative (ie: return -EINVAL)
#318: FILE: drivers/net/sfc/sfc_switch.c:242:
+		return EINVAL;

WARNING:USE_NEGATIVE_ERRNO: return of an errno should typically be negative (ie: return -EINVAL)
#340: FILE: drivers/net/sfc/sfc_switch.c:264:
+		return EINVAL;

WARNING:USE_NEGATIVE_ERRNO: return of an errno should typically be negative (ie: return -EINVAL)
#346: FILE: drivers/net/sfc/sfc_switch.c:270:
+		return EINVAL;

total: 0 errors, 8 warnings, 0 checks, 285 lines checked