From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mails.dpdk.org (mails.dpdk.org [217.70.189.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9F067A0C53 for ; Wed, 1 Sep 2021 07:43:03 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [217.70.189.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9B07740DF7; Wed, 1 Sep 2021 07:43:03 +0200 (CEST) Received: from dpdk.org (dpdk.org [92.243.24.197]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C35B840687 for ; Wed, 1 Sep 2021 07:43:02 +0200 (CEST) Received: by dpdk.org (Postfix, from userid 65534) id BC06B1226B3; Wed, 1 Sep 2021 07:43:02 +0200 (CEST) In-Reply-To: <20210901053044.109901-2-xuan.ding@intel.com> References: <20210901053044.109901-2-xuan.ding@intel.com> To: test-report@dpdk.org From: checkpatch@dpdk.org Cc: Xuan Ding Message-Id: <20210901054302.BC06B1226B3@dpdk.org> Date: Wed, 1 Sep 2021 07:43:02 +0200 (CEST) Subject: [dpdk-test-report] |WARNING| pw97661 [PATCH 1/2] vfio: allow partially unmapping adjacent memory X-BeenThere: test-report@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: automatic DPDK test reports List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: test-report-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "test-report" Test-Label: checkpatch Test-Status: WARNING http://dpdk.org/patch/97661 _coding style issues_ WARNING:TYPO_SPELLING: 'adjancent' may be misspelled - perhaps 'adjacent'? #58: one go. In other words, given segments A and B that are adjancent, it total: 0 errors, 1 warnings, 451 lines checked