From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <test-report-bounces@dpdk.org>
Received: from mails.dpdk.org (mails.dpdk.org [217.70.189.124])
	by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3D468A0C47
	for <public@inbox.dpdk.org>; Thu,  2 Sep 2021 15:19:01 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from [217.70.189.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 38F5A4003E;
	Thu,  2 Sep 2021 15:19:01 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from dpdk.org (dpdk.org [92.243.24.197])
 by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 327234003C
 for <test-report@dpdk.org>; Thu,  2 Sep 2021 15:19:00 +0200 (CEST)
Received: by dpdk.org (Postfix, from userid 65534)
 id 1DEAE122E33; Thu,  2 Sep 2021 15:19:00 +0200 (CEST)
In-Reply-To: <1630588395-2804-5-git-send-email-fengchengwen@huawei.com>
References: <1630588395-2804-5-git-send-email-fengchengwen@huawei.com>
To: test-report@dpdk.org
From: checkpatch@dpdk.org
Cc: Chengwen Feng <fengchengwen@huawei.com>
Message-Id: <20210902131900.1DEAE122E33@dpdk.org>
Date: Thu,  2 Sep 2021 15:19:00 +0200 (CEST)
Subject: [dpdk-test-report] |WARNING| pw97804 [PATCH v19 4/7] dmadev:
 introduce DMA device library implementation
X-BeenThere: test-report@dpdk.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: automatic DPDK test reports <test-report.dpdk.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://mails.dpdk.org/options/test-report>,
 <mailto:test-report-request@dpdk.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://mails.dpdk.org/archives/test-report/>
List-Post: <mailto:test-report@dpdk.org>
List-Help: <mailto:test-report-request@dpdk.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://mails.dpdk.org/listinfo/test-report>,
 <mailto:test-report-request@dpdk.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: test-report-bounces@dpdk.org
Sender: "test-report" <test-report-bounces@dpdk.org>

Test-Label: checkpatch
Test-Status: WARNING
http://dpdk.org/patch/97804

_coding style issues_


WARNING:MACRO_WITH_FLOW_CONTROL: Macros with flow control statements should be avoided
#154: FILE: lib/dmadev/rte_dmadev.c:41:
+#define RTE_DMADEV_VALID_DEV_ID_OR_ERR_RET(dev_id, retval) do { \
+	if (!rte_dmadev_is_valid_dev(dev_id)) { \
+		RTE_DMADEV_LOG(ERR, "Invalid dev_id=%u", dev_id); \
+		return retval; \
+	} \
+} while (0)

total: 0 errors, 1 warnings, 804 lines checked