From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <test-report-bounces@dpdk.org>
Received: from mails.dpdk.org (mails.dpdk.org [217.70.189.124])
	by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2675AA0548
	for <public@inbox.dpdk.org>; Wed,  3 Nov 2021 23:13:49 +0100 (CET)
Received: from [217.70.189.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1F94D40E0F;
	Wed,  3 Nov 2021 23:13:49 +0100 (CET)
Received: from dpdk.org (dpdk.org [92.243.24.197])
 by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9244B40689
 for <test-report@dpdk.org>; Wed,  3 Nov 2021 23:13:47 +0100 (CET)
Received: by dpdk.org (Postfix, from userid 65534)
 id 6EEA2123056; Wed,  3 Nov 2021 23:13:47 +0100 (CET)
In-Reply-To: <20211103221205.63175-1-stephen@networkplumber.org>
References: <20211103221205.63175-1-stephen@networkplumber.org>
To: test-report@dpdk.org
From: checkpatch@dpdk.org
Cc: Stephen Hemminger <stephen@networkplumber.org>
Message-Id: <20211103221347.6EEA2123056@dpdk.org>
Date: Wed,  3 Nov 2021 23:13:47 +0100 (CET)
Subject: [dpdk-test-report] |WARNING| pw103697 [RFC] build: allow build DPDK
 as a meson submodule
X-BeenThere: test-report@dpdk.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: automatic DPDK test reports <test-report.dpdk.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://mails.dpdk.org/options/test-report>,
 <mailto:test-report-request@dpdk.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://mails.dpdk.org/archives/test-report/>
List-Post: <mailto:test-report@dpdk.org>
List-Help: <mailto:test-report-request@dpdk.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://mails.dpdk.org/listinfo/test-report>,
 <mailto:test-report-request@dpdk.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: test-report-bounces@dpdk.org
Sender: "test-report" <test-report-bounces@dpdk.org>

Test-Label: checkpatch
Test-Status: WARNING
http://dpdk.org/patch/103697

_coding style issues_


WARNING:TYPO_SPELLING: 'depedency' may be misspelled - perhaps 'dependency'?
#83: 
This patch adds the necessary depedency to follow the

WARNING:TYPO_SPELLING: 'depedency' may be misspelled - perhaps 'dependency'?
#84: 
"Naming convention for depedency variables" from the documentation.

total: 0 errors, 2 warnings, 16 lines checked