From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mails.dpdk.org (mails.dpdk.org [217.70.189.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CCA8EA0C4D for ; Mon, 8 Nov 2021 11:49:10 +0100 (CET) Received: from [217.70.189.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C911541100; Mon, 8 Nov 2021 11:49:10 +0100 (CET) Received: from dpdk.org (dpdk.org [92.243.24.197]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 24F7640E28 for ; Mon, 8 Nov 2021 11:49:10 +0100 (CET) Received: by dpdk.org (Postfix, from userid 65534) id 1A5DE123056; Mon, 8 Nov 2021 11:49:10 +0100 (CET) In-Reply-To: <20211108185805.3887-9-eagostini@nvidia.com> References: <20211108185805.3887-9-eagostini@nvidia.com> To: test-report@dpdk.org From: checkpatch@dpdk.org Cc: Message-Id: <20211108104910.1A5DE123056@dpdk.org> Date: Mon, 8 Nov 2021 11:49:10 +0100 (CET) Subject: [dpdk-test-report] |WARNING| pw103978 [PATCH v5 8/9] gpudev: add communication list X-BeenThere: test-report@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: automatic DPDK test reports List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: test-report-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "test-report" Test-Label: checkpatch Test-Status: WARNING http://dpdk.org/patch/103978 _coding style issues_ WARNING:TYPO_SPELLING: 'erroneusly' may be misspelled - perhaps 'erroneously'? #241: FILE: app/test-gpudev/main.c:271: + fprintf(stderr, "rte_gpu_comm_cleanup_list erroneusly cleaned the list even if packets have not beeing consumed yet "); WARNING:TYPO_SPELLING: 'beeing' may be misspelled - perhaps 'being'? #241: FILE: app/test-gpudev/main.c:271: + fprintf(stderr, "rte_gpu_comm_cleanup_list erroneusly cleaned the list even if packets have not beeing consumed yet "); WARNING:UNNECESSARY_ELSE: else is not generally useful after a break or return #243: FILE: app/test-gpudev/main.c:273: + return -1; + } else { WARNING:TYPO_SPELLING: 'beeing' may be misspelled - perhaps 'being'? #244: FILE: app/test-gpudev/main.c:274: + fprintf(stderr, "rte_gpu_comm_cleanup_list correctly didn't clean up the packets because they have not beeing consumed yet "); WARNING:TYPO_SPELLING: 'expecially' may be misspelled - perhaps 'especially'? #300: FILE: doc/guides/prog_guide/gpudev.rst:94: +Best practice, expecially in a multithreaded application, WARNING:LONG_LINE: line length of 101 exceeds 100 columns #360: FILE: lib/gpudev/gpudev.c:766: + ret = rte_gpu_register(dev_id, sizeof(struct rte_gpu_comm_list) * num_comm_items, comm_list); WARNING:LONG_LINE: line length of 127 exceeds 100 columns #367: FILE: lib/gpudev/gpudev.c:773: + comm_list[idx_l].pkt_list = rte_zmalloc(NULL, sizeof(struct rte_gpu_comm_pkt) * RTE_GPU_COMM_LIST_PKTS_MAX, 0); WARNING:LONG_LINE: line length of 136 exceeds 100 columns #373: FILE: lib/gpudev/gpudev.c:779: + ret = rte_gpu_register(dev_id, sizeof(struct rte_gpu_comm_pkt) * RTE_GPU_COMM_LIST_PKTS_MAX, comm_list[idx_l].pkt_list); WARNING:LONG_LINE: line length of 118 exceeds 100 columns #383: FILE: lib/gpudev/gpudev.c:789: + comm_list[idx_l].mbufs = rte_zmalloc(NULL, sizeof(struct rte_mbuf *) * RTE_GPU_COMM_LIST_PKTS_MAX, 0); total: 0 errors, 9 warnings, 472 lines checked