From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <test-report-bounces@dpdk.org>
Received: from mails.dpdk.org (mails.dpdk.org [217.70.189.124])
	by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0B8A8A0032
	for <public@inbox.dpdk.org>; Tue, 16 Nov 2021 00:24:26 +0100 (CET)
Received: from [217.70.189.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0424540E25;
	Tue, 16 Nov 2021 00:24:26 +0100 (CET)
Received: from dpdk.org (dpdk.org [92.243.24.197])
 by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5DB6E40E25
 for <test-report@dpdk.org>; Tue, 16 Nov 2021 00:24:24 +0100 (CET)
Received: by dpdk.org (Postfix, from userid 65534)
 id 4ADA2120735; Tue, 16 Nov 2021 00:24:24 +0100 (CET)
Subject: |WARNING| pw104347 [PATCH v3] test/bpf_convert: do not require DNS
 lookup
In-Reply-To: <20211115232337.118084-1-stephen@networkplumber.org>
References: <20211115232337.118084-1-stephen@networkplumber.org>
To: test-report@dpdk.org
From: checkpatch@dpdk.org
Cc: Stephen Hemminger <stephen@networkplumber.org>
Message-Id: <20211115232424.4ADA2120735@dpdk.org>
Date: Tue, 16 Nov 2021 00:24:24 +0100 (CET)
X-BeenThere: test-report@dpdk.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: automatic DPDK test reports <test-report.dpdk.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://mails.dpdk.org/options/test-report>,
 <mailto:test-report-request@dpdk.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://mails.dpdk.org/archives/test-report/>
List-Post: <mailto:test-report@dpdk.org>
List-Help: <mailto:test-report-request@dpdk.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://mails.dpdk.org/listinfo/test-report>,
 <mailto:test-report-request@dpdk.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: test-report-bounces@dpdk.org

Test-Label: checkpatch
Test-Status: WARNING
http://dpdk.org/patch/104347

_coding style issues_


WARNING:COMMIT_LOG_LONG_LINE: Possible unwrapped commit description (prefer a maximum 75 chars per line)
#82: 
reserved for documentation (RFC 5737) and use IPv6 in one example (RFC 3849).

WARNING:TYPO_SPELLING: 'succesfully' may be misspelled - perhaps 'successfully'?
#84: 
code generated in classic BPF can be succesfully converted to eBPF.

total: 0 errors, 2 warnings, 10 lines checked