From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mails.dpdk.org (mails.dpdk.org [217.70.189.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 91FE6A0C41 for ; Fri, 3 Dec 2021 23:57:41 +0100 (CET) Received: from [217.70.189.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8E8E04014F; Fri, 3 Dec 2021 23:57:41 +0100 (CET) Received: from dpdk.org (dpdk.org [92.243.24.197]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EE1C540041 for ; Fri, 3 Dec 2021 23:57:39 +0100 (CET) Received: by dpdk.org (Postfix, from userid 65534) id E8C6C122DB7; Fri, 3 Dec 2021 23:57:39 +0100 (CET) Subject: |WARNING| pw104864 [PATCH 6/7] net/ixgbe: Retry SFP ID read field to handle misbehaving SFPs In-Reply-To: <20211203225516.571368-7-stephend@silicom-usa.com> References: <20211203225516.571368-7-stephend@silicom-usa.com> To: test-report@dpdk.org From: checkpatch@dpdk.org Cc: Stephen Douthit Message-Id: <20211203225739.E8C6C122DB7@dpdk.org> Date: Fri, 3 Dec 2021 23:57:39 +0100 (CET) X-BeenThere: test-report@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: automatic DPDK test reports List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: test-report-bounces@dpdk.org Test-Label: checkpatch Test-Status: WARNING http://dpdk.org/patch/104864 _coding style issues_ WARNING:TYPO_SPELLING: 'trasaction' may be misspelled - perhaps 'transaction'? #118: Since the device isn't NAKing the trasaction the existing longer retry code WARNING:TYPO_SPELLING: 'slave' may be misspelled - perhaps 'secondary'? #149: FILE: drivers/net/ixgbe/base/ixgbe_phy.c:1295: + * whatever bogus data is in the SRAM (or whatever is backing the slave WARNING:TYPO_SPELLING: 'truely' may be misspelled - perhaps 'truly'? #150: FILE: drivers/net/ixgbe/base/ixgbe_phy.c:1296: + * device) before things are truely initialized. total: 0 errors, 3 warnings, 0 checks, 45 lines checked