From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <test-report-bounces@dpdk.org>
Received: from mails.dpdk.org (mails.dpdk.org [217.70.189.124])
	by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3E791A0350
	for <public@inbox.dpdk.org>; Mon,  3 Jan 2022 11:02:12 +0100 (CET)
Received: from [217.70.189.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 64CAF40E0F;
	Mon,  3 Jan 2022 11:02:11 +0100 (CET)
Received: from dpdk.org (dpdk.org [92.243.24.197])
 by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BCB3C407FF
 for <test-report@dpdk.org>; Mon,  3 Jan 2022 11:02:10 +0100 (CET)
Received: by dpdk.org (Postfix, from userid 65534)
 id 68FBC120D7B; Mon,  3 Jan 2022 11:02:09 +0100 (CET)
Subject: |WARNING| pw105557 [PATCH v3 01/15] bus/fslmc: update MC to 10.29
In-Reply-To: <20220103100129.23965-2-nipun.gupta@nxp.com>
References: <20220103100129.23965-2-nipun.gupta@nxp.com>
To: test-report@dpdk.org
From: checkpatch@dpdk.org
Cc: nipun.gupta@nxp.com
Message-Id: <20220103100209.68FBC120D7B@dpdk.org>
Date: Mon,  3 Jan 2022 11:02:09 +0100 (CET)
X-BeenThere: test-report@dpdk.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: automatic DPDK test reports <test-report.dpdk.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://mails.dpdk.org/options/test-report>,
 <mailto:test-report-request@dpdk.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://mails.dpdk.org/archives/test-report/>
List-Post: <mailto:test-report@dpdk.org>
List-Help: <mailto:test-report-request@dpdk.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://mails.dpdk.org/listinfo/test-report>,
 <mailto:test-report-request@dpdk.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: test-report-bounces@dpdk.org

Test-Label: checkpatch
Test-Status: WARNING
http://dpdk.org/patch/105557

_coding style issues_


CHECK:MACRO_ARG_PRECEDENCE: Macro argument 'shaping_lni' may be better as '(shaping_lni)' to avoid precedence issues
#550: FILE: drivers/net/dpaa2/mc/fsl_dpni.h:808:
+#define DPNI_TX_SHAPING_PARAM(oal, shaping_lni, channel_id, coupled)	( \
+		((uint32_t)(((oal) & 0x7ff) << 16)) | \
+		((uint32_t)((channel_id) & 0xff) << 8) | \
+		((uint32_t)(!!shaping_lni) << 1) | \
+		((uint32_t)!!coupled))

CHECK:MACRO_ARG_PRECEDENCE: Macro argument 'coupled' may be better as '(coupled)' to avoid precedence issues
#550: FILE: drivers/net/dpaa2/mc/fsl_dpni.h:808:
+#define DPNI_TX_SHAPING_PARAM(oal, shaping_lni, channel_id, coupled)	( \
+		((uint32_t)(((oal) & 0x7ff) << 16)) | \
+		((uint32_t)((channel_id) & 0xff) << 8) | \
+		((uint32_t)(!!shaping_lni) << 1) | \
+		((uint32_t)!!coupled))

total: 0 errors, 0 warnings, 2 checks, 669 lines checked