* |WARNING| pw116048 [PATCH] [v2, 2/5] mbuf: add second dynamic field member for VA only build
@ 2022-09-07 18:21 dpdklab
0 siblings, 0 replies; only message in thread
From: dpdklab @ 2022-09-07 18:21 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: test-report; +Cc: dpdk-test-reports
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2516 bytes --]
Test-Label: iol-testing
Test-Status: WARNING
http://dpdk.org/patch/116048
_apply patch failure_
Submitter: Shijith Thotton <sthotton@marvell.com>
Date: Wednesday, September 07 2022 13:43:37
Applied on: CommitID:4aee6110bb10b0225fa9562f2e48af233a9058a1
Apply patch set 116048 failed:
Checking patch lib/mbuf/rte_mbuf_core.h...
error: while searching for:
RTE_MARKER cacheline0;
void *buf_addr; /**< Virtual address of segment buffer. */
/**
* Physical address of segment buffer.
* This field is invalid if the build is configured to use only
* virtual address as IOVA (i.e. RTE_IOVA_AS_VA is 1).
* Force alignment to 8-bytes, so as to ensure we have the exact
* same mbuf cacheline0 layout for 32-bit and 64-bit. This makes
* working on vector drivers easier.
*/
rte_iova_t buf_iova __rte_aligned(sizeof(rte_iova_t));
/* next 8 bytes are initialised on RX descriptor rearm */
RTE_MARKER64 rearm_data;
error: patch failed: lib/mbuf/rte_mbuf_core.h:579
Checking patch lib/mbuf/rte_mbuf_dyn.c...
Applying patch lib/mbuf/rte_mbuf_core.h with 1 reject...
Rejected hunk #1.
Applied patch lib/mbuf/rte_mbuf_dyn.c cleanly.
diff a/lib/mbuf/rte_mbuf_core.h b/lib/mbuf/rte_mbuf_core.h (rejected hunks)
@@ -579,15 +579,23 @@ struct rte_mbuf {
RTE_MARKER cacheline0;
void *buf_addr; /**< Virtual address of segment buffer. */
- /**
- * Physical address of segment buffer.
- * This field is invalid if the build is configured to use only
- * virtual address as IOVA (i.e. RTE_IOVA_AS_VA is 1).
- * Force alignment to 8-bytes, so as to ensure we have the exact
- * same mbuf cacheline0 layout for 32-bit and 64-bit. This makes
- * working on vector drivers easier.
- */
- rte_iova_t buf_iova __rte_aligned(sizeof(rte_iova_t));
+ RTE_STD_C11
+ union {
+ /**
+ * Physical address of segment buffer.
+ * This field is invalid if the build is configured to use only
+ * virtual address as IOVA (i.e. RTE_IOVA_AS_VA is 1).
+ * Force alignment to 8-bytes, so as to ensure we have the exact
+ * same mbuf cacheline0 layout for 32-bit and 64-bit. This makes
+ * working on vector drivers easier.
+ */
+ rte_iova_t buf_iova __rte_aligned(sizeof(rte_iova_t));
+ /**
+ * Reserved for dynamic field in builds where physical address
+ * field is invalid.
+ */
+ uint64_t dynfield2;
+ };
/* next 8 bytes are initialised on RX descriptor rearm */
RTE_MARKER64 rearm_data;
https://lab.dpdk.org/results/dashboard/patchsets/23444/
UNH-IOL DPDK Community Lab
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] only message in thread
only message in thread, other threads:[~2022-09-07 18:21 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: (only message) (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2022-09-07 18:21 |WARNING| pw116048 [PATCH] [v2, 2/5] mbuf: add second dynamic field member for VA only build dpdklab
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).