From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <test-report-bounces@dpdk.org>
Received: from mails.dpdk.org (mails.dpdk.org [217.70.189.124])
	by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 32C70A00C4
	for <public@inbox.dpdk.org>; Wed, 28 Sep 2022 14:48:19 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from [217.70.189.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2FFA24113D;
	Wed, 28 Sep 2022 14:48:19 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from dpdk.org (dpdk.org [92.243.24.197])
 by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 32FCB4113C
 for <test-report@dpdk.org>; Wed, 28 Sep 2022 14:48:18 +0200 (CEST)
Received: by dpdk.org (Postfix, from userid 65534)
 id 2797112231E; Wed, 28 Sep 2022 14:48:18 +0200 (CEST)
Subject: |WARNING| pw117056 [PATCH 4/5] test/security: add inline MACsec cases
In-Reply-To: <20220928124516.93050-5-gakhil@marvell.com>
References: <20220928124516.93050-5-gakhil@marvell.com>
To: test-report@dpdk.org
From: checkpatch@dpdk.org
Cc: Akhil Goyal <gakhil@marvell.com>
Message-Id: <20220928124818.2797112231E@dpdk.org>
Date: Wed, 28 Sep 2022 14:48:18 +0200 (CEST)
X-BeenThere: test-report@dpdk.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: automatic DPDK test reports <test-report.dpdk.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://mails.dpdk.org/options/test-report>,
 <mailto:test-report-request@dpdk.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://mails.dpdk.org/archives/test-report/>
List-Post: <mailto:test-report@dpdk.org>
List-Help: <mailto:test-report-request@dpdk.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://mails.dpdk.org/listinfo/test-report>,
 <mailto:test-report-request@dpdk.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: test-report-bounces@dpdk.org

Test-Label: checkpatch
Test-Status: WARNING
http://dpdk.org/patch/117056

_coding style issues_


WARNING:BLOCK_COMMENT_STYLE: Block comments use a trailing */ on a separate line
#303: FILE: app/test/test_security_inline_macsec.c:193:
+	 * from the test vector so that we can match the out packet. */

ERROR:C99_COMMENTS: do not use C99 // comments
#357: FILE: app/test/test_security_inline_macsec.c:247:
+//	struct rte_security_capability_idx sec_cap_idx;

ERROR:C99_COMMENTS: do not use C99 // comments
#358: FILE: app/test/test_security_inline_macsec.c:248:
+//	const struct rte_security_capability *sec_cap;

ERROR:C99_COMMENTS: do not use C99 // comments
#392: FILE: app/test/test_security_inline_macsec.c:282:
+//	sec_cap = rte_security_capability_get(sec_ctx, &sec_cap_idx);

ERROR:C99_COMMENTS: do not use C99 // comments
#393: FILE: app/test/test_security_inline_macsec.c:283:
+//	if (sec_cap == NULL) {

ERROR:C99_COMMENTS: do not use C99 // comments
#394: FILE: app/test/test_security_inline_macsec.c:284:
+//		printf("No capabilities registered
");

ERROR:C99_COMMENTS: do not use C99 // comments
#395: FILE: app/test/test_security_inline_macsec.c:285:
+//		return TEST_SKIPPED;

ERROR:C99_COMMENTS: do not use C99 // comments
#396: FILE: app/test/test_security_inline_macsec.c:286:
+//	}

total: 7 errors, 1 warnings, 3146 lines checked
Warning in app/test/test_security_inline_macsec.c:
Declaring a variable inside for()