|WARNING| pw126247 [PATCH] [v2] mempool: optimize get objects with constant n

|WARNING| pw126247 [PATCH] [v2] mempool: optimize get objects with constant n

[dpdklab]

Test-Label: iol-testing
Test-Status: WARNING
http://dpdk.org/patch/126247

_apply patch failure_

Submitter: Morten Brorup <mb@smartsharesystems.com>
Date: Tuesday, April 18 2023 15:57:30 
Applied on: CommitID:3b3fef9de22af80d173453ab65a80b01ce38cbfd
Apply patch set 126247 failed:

Checking patch lib/mempool/rte_mempool.h...
error: while searching for:
			   unsigned int n, struct rte_mempool_cache *cache)
{
	int ret;
	unsigned int remaining = n;
	uint32_t index, len;
	void **cache_objs;

	/* No cache provided */
	if (unlikely(cache == NULL))
		goto driver_dequeue;

	cache_objs = &cache->objs[cache->len];


error: patch failed: lib/mempool/rte_mempool.h:1492
error: while searching for:
		return 0;
	}

	/* Use the cache as much as we have to return hot objects first */
	len = __extension__(__builtin_constant_p(n)) ? cache->len :
			RTE_MIN(remaining, cache->len);
	cache->len -= len;
	remaining -= len;
	for (index = 0; index < len; index++)
		*obj_table++ = *--cache_objs;

	if (!__extension__(__builtin_constant_p(n)) && remaining == 0) {
		/* The entire request is satisfied from the cache. */


error: patch failed: lib/mempool/rte_mempool.h:1518
Applying patch lib/mempool/rte_mempool.h with 2 rejects...
Rejected hunk #1.
Rejected hunk #2.
hint: Use 'git am --show-current-patch' to see the failed patch
diff a/lib/mempool/rte_mempool.h b/lib/mempool/rte_mempool.h	(rejected hunks)
@@ -1492,13 +1492,15 @@ rte_mempool_do_generic_get(struct rte_mempool *mp, void **obj_table,
 			   unsigned int n, struct rte_mempool_cache *cache)
 {
 	int ret;
-	unsigned int remaining = n;
+	unsigned int remaining;
 	uint32_t index, len;
 	void **cache_objs;
 
 	/* No cache provided */
-	if (unlikely(cache == NULL))
+	if (unlikely(cache == NULL)) {
+		remaining = n;
 		goto driver_dequeue;
+	}
 
 	cache_objs = &cache->objs[cache->len];
 
@@ -1518,14 +1520,23 @@ rte_mempool_do_generic_get(struct rte_mempool *mp, void **obj_table,
 		return 0;
 	}
 
-	/* Use the cache as much as we have to return hot objects first */
+	/*
+	 * Use the cache as much as we have to return hot objects first.
+	 * If the request size 'n' is known at build time, the above comparison
+	 * ensures that n > cache->len here, so omit RTE_MIN().
+	 */
 	len = __extension__(__builtin_constant_p(n)) ? cache->len :
-			RTE_MIN(remaining, cache->len);
+			RTE_MIN(n, cache->len);
 	cache->len -= len;
-	remaining -= len;
+	remaining = n - len;
 	for (index = 0; index < len; index++)
 		*obj_table++ = *--cache_objs;
 
+	/*
+	 * If the request size 'n' is known at build time, the case
+	 * where the entire request can be satisfied from the cache
+	 * has already been handled above, so omit handling it here.
+	 */
 	if (!__extension__(__builtin_constant_p(n)) && remaining == 0) {
 		/* The entire request is satisfied from the cache. */
 

https://lab.dpdk.org/results/dashboard/patchsets/26038/

UNH-IOL DPDK Community Lab

|WARNING| pw126247 [PATCH v2] mempool: optimize get objects with constant n

[qemudev]

Test-Label: loongarch-compilation
Test-Status: WARNING
http://dpdk.org/patch/126247

_apply patch failure_

Submitter: Morten Brørup <mb@smartsharesystems.com>
Date: Tue, 18 Apr 2023 17:57:30 +0200
DPDK git baseline: Repo:dpdk
  Branch: main
  CommitID: 3b3fef9de22af80d173453ab65a80b01ce38cbfd

Apply patch set 126247 failed:

Checking patch lib/mempool/rte_mempool.h...
error: while searching for:
			   unsigned int n, struct rte_mempool_cache *cache)
{
	int ret;
	unsigned int remaining = n;
	uint32_t index, len;
	void **cache_objs;

	/* No cache provided */
	if (unlikely(cache == NULL))
		goto driver_dequeue;

	cache_objs = &cache->objs[cache->len];


error: patch failed: lib/mempool/rte_mempool.h:1492
error: lib/mempool/rte_mempool.h: patch does not apply

|WARNING| pw126247 [PATCH v2] mempool: optimize get objects with constant n

[checkpatch]

Test-Label: checkpatch
Test-Status: WARNING
http://dpdk.org/patch/126247

_coding style issues_

Must be a reply to the first patch (--in-reply-to).