* |WARNING| pw158064 [PATCH v11 4/9] lib/pmu: reimplement per-arch ops as callbacks
[not found] <20251024054830.933910-5-tduszynski@marvell.com>
@ 2025-10-24 5:49 ` checkpatch
0 siblings, 0 replies; only message in thread
From: checkpatch @ 2025-10-24 5:49 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: test-report; +Cc: Tomasz Duszynski
Test-Label: checkpatch
Test-Status: WARNING
http://dpdk.org/patch/158064
_coding style issues_
ERROR:COMPLEX_MACRO: Macros with complex values should be enclosed in parentheses
#195: FILE: lib/pmu/pmu_private.h:19:
+#define PMU_SET_ARCH_OPS(ops) \
+ RTE_INIT(libpmu_set_arch_ops) \
+ { \
+ arch_ops = &(ops); \
+ }
BUT SEE:
do {} while (0) advice is over-stated in a few situations:
The more obvious case is macros, like MODULE_PARM_DESC, invoked at
file-scope, where C disallows code (it must be in functions). See
$exceptions if you have one to add by name.
More troublesome is declarative macros used at top of new scope,
like DECLARE_PER_CPU. These might just compile with a do-while-0
wrapper, but would be incorrect. Most of these are handled by
detecting struct,union,etc declaration primitives in $exceptions.
Theres also macros called inside an if (block), which "return" an
expression. These cannot do-while, and need a ({}) wrapper.
Enjoy this qualification while we work to improve our heuristics.
total: 1 errors, 0 warnings, 125 lines checked
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] only message in thread
only message in thread, other threads:[~2025-10-24 5:49 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: (only message) (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
[not found] <20251024054830.933910-5-tduszynski@marvell.com>
2025-10-24 5:49 ` |WARNING| pw158064 [PATCH v11 4/9] lib/pmu: reimplement per-arch ops as callbacks checkpatch
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).