automatic DPDK test reports
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* |WARNING| pw158198 [PATCH v1 5/8] vfio: cleanup and refactor
       [not found] <9eac42bcb583725666e1269e93da7280591af28a.1761669439.git.anatoly.burakov@intel.com>
@ 2025-10-28 16:45 ` checkpatch
  0 siblings, 0 replies; only message in thread
From: checkpatch @ 2025-10-28 16:45 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: test-report; +Cc: Anatoly Burakov

Test-Label: checkpatch
Test-Status: WARNING
http://dpdk.org/patch/158198

_coding style issues_


ERROR:COMPLEX_MACRO: Macros with complex values should be enclosed in parentheses
#3863: FILE: lib/eal/linux/eal_vfio.h:115:
+#define CONTAINER_FOREACH_ACTIVE(cfg) \
+	CONTAINER_FOREACH((cfg)) \
+		if (((cfg)->active))

BUT SEE:

   do {} while (0) advice is over-stated in a few situations:

   The more obvious case is macros, like MODULE_PARM_DESC, invoked at
   file-scope, where C disallows code (it must be in functions).  See
   $exceptions if you have one to add by name.

   More troublesome is declarative macros used at top of new scope,
   like DECLARE_PER_CPU.  These might just compile with a do-while-0
   wrapper, but would be incorrect.  Most of these are handled by
   detecting struct,union,etc declaration primitives in $exceptions.

   Theres also macros called inside an if (block), which "return" an
   expression.  These cannot do-while, and need a ({}) wrapper.

   Enjoy this qualification while we work to improve our heuristics.

ERROR:COMPLEX_MACRO: Macros with complex values should be enclosed in parentheses
#3872: FILE: lib/eal/linux/eal_vfio.h:124:
+#define GROUP_FOREACH_ACTIVE(cfg, grp) \
+	GROUP_FOREACH((cfg), (grp)) \
+		if (((grp)->active))

BUT SEE:

   do {} while (0) advice is over-stated in a few situations:

   The more obvious case is macros, like MODULE_PARM_DESC, invoked at
   file-scope, where C disallows code (it must be in functions).  See
   $exceptions if you have one to add by name.

   More troublesome is declarative macros used at top of new scope,
   like DECLARE_PER_CPU.  These might just compile with a do-while-0
   wrapper, but would be incorrect.  Most of these are handled by
   detecting struct,union,etc declaration primitives in $exceptions.

   Theres also macros called inside an if (block), which "return" an
   expression.  These cannot do-while, and need a ({}) wrapper.

   Enjoy this qualification while we work to improve our heuristics.

ERROR:COMPLEX_MACRO: Macros with complex values should be enclosed in parentheses
#3886: FILE: lib/eal/linux/eal_vfio.h:133:
+#define DEVICE_FOREACH_ACTIVE(cfg, dev) \
+	DEVICE_FOREACH((cfg), (dev)) \
+		if (((dev)->active))

BUT SEE:

   do {} while (0) advice is over-stated in a few situations:

   The more obvious case is macros, like MODULE_PARM_DESC, invoked at
   file-scope, where C disallows code (it must be in functions).  See
   $exceptions if you have one to add by name.

   More troublesome is declarative macros used at top of new scope,
   like DECLARE_PER_CPU.  These might just compile with a do-while-0
   wrapper, but would be incorrect.  Most of these are handled by
   detecting struct,union,etc declaration primitives in $exceptions.

   Theres also macros called inside an if (block), which "return" an
   expression.  These cannot do-while, and need a ({}) wrapper.

   Enjoy this qualification while we work to improve our heuristics.

total: 3 errors, 0 warnings, 4775 lines checked

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] only message in thread

only message in thread, other threads:[~2025-10-28 16:46 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: (only message) (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
     [not found] <9eac42bcb583725666e1269e93da7280591af28a.1761669439.git.anatoly.burakov@intel.com>
2025-10-28 16:45 ` |WARNING| pw158198 [PATCH v1 5/8] vfio: cleanup and refactor checkpatch

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).