From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mails.dpdk.org (mails.dpdk.org [217.70.189.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 74B1D47180 for ; Mon, 5 Jan 2026 07:55:33 +0100 (CET) Received: from mails.dpdk.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6F13240267; Mon, 5 Jan 2026 07:55:33 +0100 (CET) Received: from dpdk.org (dpdk.org [92.243.24.197]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D883840267 for ; Mon, 5 Jan 2026 07:55:32 +0100 (CET) Received: by dpdk.org (Postfix, from userid 65534) id 6394B124270; Mon, 5 Jan 2026 07:55:31 +0100 (CET) Subject: |WARNING| pw159574 [RFC] bsd_pbf: introduce new driver using FreeBSD /dev/bpf In-Reply-To: <20260105065344.70462-1-stephen@networkplumber.org> References: <20260105065344.70462-1-stephen@networkplumber.org> To: test-report@dpdk.org From: checkpatch@dpdk.org Cc: Stephen Hemminger Message-Id: <20260105065531.6394B124270@dpdk.org> Date: Mon, 5 Jan 2026 07:55:31 +0100 (CET) X-BeenThere: test-report@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: automatic DPDK test reports List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: test-report-bounces@dpdk.org Test-Label: checkpatch Test-Status: WARNING http://dpdk.org/patch/159574 _coding style issues_ WARNING:UNSPECIFIED_INT: Prefer 'unsigned int' to bare use of 'unsigned' #372: FILE: drivers/net/bsd_bpf/rte_eth_bpf.c:87: + unsigned nb_queues; WARNING:STATIC_CONST_CHAR_ARRAY: static const char * array should probably be static const char * const #388: FILE: drivers/net/bsd_bpf/rte_eth_bpf.c:103: +static const char *valid_arguments[] = { WARNING:UNSPECIFIED_INT: Prefer 'unsigned int' to bare use of 'unsigned' #490: FILE: drivers/net/bsd_bpf/rte_eth_bpf.c:205: + unsigned i; CHECK:BRACES: Unbalanced braces around else statement #518: FILE: drivers/net/bsd_bpf/rte_eth_bpf.c:233: + } else WARNING:UNSPECIFIED_INT: Prefer 'unsigned int' to bare use of 'unsigned' #689: FILE: drivers/net/bsd_bpf/rte_eth_bpf.c:404: + unsigned i; WARNING:UNSPECIFIED_INT: Prefer 'unsigned int' to bare use of 'unsigned' #770: FILE: drivers/net/bsd_bpf/rte_eth_bpf.c:485: + unsigned i; CHECK:BRACES: Unbalanced braces around else statement #810: FILE: drivers/net/bsd_bpf/rte_eth_bpf.c:525: + } else WARNING:UNSPECIFIED_INT: Prefer 'unsigned int' to bare use of 'unsigned' #1085: FILE: drivers/net/bsd_bpf/rte_eth_bpf.c:800: + const unsigned nb_queues, WARNING:BRACES: braces {} are not necessary for single statement blocks #1206: FILE: drivers/net/bsd_bpf/rte_eth_bpf.c:921: + if (zerocopy) { + PMD_LOG(WARNING, "Zero-copy BPF not supported on this platform"); + } CHECK:BRACES: Unbalanced braces around else statement #1325: FILE: drivers/net/bsd_bpf/rte_eth_bpf.c:1040: + } else CHECK:BRACES: Unbalanced braces around else statement #1382: FILE: drivers/net/bsd_bpf/rte_eth_bpf.c:1097: + } else WARNING:UNSPECIFIED_INT: Prefer 'unsigned int' to bare use of 'unsigned' #1406: FILE: drivers/net/bsd_bpf/rte_eth_bpf.c:1121: + unsigned k_idx; total: 0 errors, 8 warnings, 4 checks, 1405 lines checked Warning in drivers/net/bsd_bpf/rte_eth_bpf.c: Using __atomic_xxx/__ATOMIC_XXX built-ins, prefer rte_atomic_xxx/rte_memory_order_xxx