From: dpdklab@iol.unh.edu
To: test-report@dpdk.org
Cc: dpdk-test-reports@iol.unh.edu
Subject: |WARNING| pw127803-127805 [PATCH] [3/3] net/sfc: support VLAN stripping offload
Date: Fri, 09 Jun 2023 15:50:12 -0700 (PDT) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <6483aca4.0d0a0220.8625e.befaSMTPIN_ADDED_MISSING@mx.google.com> (raw)
Test-Label: iol-testing
Test-Status: WARNING
http://dpdk.org/patch/127803
_apply patch failure_
Submitter: Artemii Morozov <Artemii.Morozov@arknetworks.am>
Date: Wednesday, May 31 2023 13:41:22
Applied on: CommitID:c9df59bcc9bec67783de98486879594e52bdc418
Apply patch set 127803-127805 failed:
Checking patch drivers/common/sfc_efx/base/ef10_nic.c...
Hunk #1 succeeded at 1227 (offset -89 lines).
Checking patch drivers/common/sfc_efx/base/efx.h...
Hunk #1 succeeded at 1638 (offset -12 lines).
Checking patch drivers/common/sfc_efx/base/siena_nic.c...
error: while searching for:
encp->enc_rx_include_fcs_supported = B_FALSE;
encp->enc_rx_es_super_buffer_supported = B_FALSE;
encp->enc_fw_subvariant_no_tx_csum_supported = B_FALSE;
/* Siena supports two 10G ports, and 8 lanes of PCIe Gen2 */
encp->enc_required_pcie_bandwidth_mbps = 2 * 10000;
error: patch failed: drivers/common/sfc_efx/base/siena_nic.c:190
Applied patch drivers/common/sfc_efx/base/ef10_nic.c cleanly.
Applied patch drivers/common/sfc_efx/base/efx.h cleanly.
Applying patch drivers/common/sfc_efx/base/siena_nic.c with 1 reject...
Rejected hunk #1.
hint: Use 'git am --show-current-patch' to see the failed patch
diff a/drivers/common/sfc_efx/base/siena_nic.c b/drivers/common/sfc_efx/base/siena_nic.c (rejected hunks)
@@ -190,6 +190,7 @@ siena_board_cfg(
encp->enc_rx_include_fcs_supported = B_FALSE;
encp->enc_rx_es_super_buffer_supported = B_FALSE;
encp->enc_fw_subvariant_no_tx_csum_supported = B_FALSE;
+ encp->enc_rx_vlan_stripping = B_FALSE;
/* Siena supports two 10G ports, and 8 lanes of PCIe Gen2 */
encp->enc_required_pcie_bandwidth_mbps = 2 * 10000;
Checking patch drivers/common/sfc_efx/base/ef10_filter.c...
error: while searching for:
FILTER_OP_V3_IN_MATCH_SET_FLAG, 1);
}
efx_mcdi_execute(enp, &req);
if (req.emr_rc != 0) {
error: patch failed: drivers/common/sfc_efx/base/ef10_filter.c:338
Hunk #2 succeeded at 852 (offset -5 lines).
Hunk #3 succeeded at 2020 (offset -5 lines).
Hunk #4 succeeded at 2155 (offset -5 lines).
Hunk #5 succeeded at 2168 (offset -5 lines).
Checking patch drivers/common/sfc_efx/base/ef10_impl.h...
Checking patch drivers/common/sfc_efx/base/efx.h...
error: drivers/common/sfc_efx/base/efx.h: does not match index
Checking patch drivers/common/sfc_efx/base/efx_filter.c...
Checking patch drivers/common/sfc_efx/base/efx_impl.h...
Hunk #1 succeeded at 1045 (offset -1 lines).
Checking patch drivers/common/sfc_efx/base/efx_rx.c...
error: while searching for:
}
}
enp->en_rx_qcount++;
*erpp = erp;
return (0);
fail5:
EFSYS_PROBE(fail5);
error: patch failed: drivers/common/sfc_efx/base/efx_rx.c:943
Checking patch drivers/common/sfc_efx/base/rhead_rx.c...
Applying patch drivers/common/sfc_efx/base/ef10_filter.c with 1 reject...
Rejected hunk #1.
Hunk #2 applied cleanly.
Hunk #3 applied cleanly.
Hunk #4 applied cleanly.
Hunk #5 applied cleanly.
Applied patch drivers/common/sfc_efx/base/ef10_impl.h cleanly.
Applied patch drivers/common/sfc_efx/base/efx_filter.c cleanly.
Applied patch drivers/common/sfc_efx/base/efx_impl.h cleanly.
Applying patch drivers/common/sfc_efx/base/efx_rx.c with 1 reject...
Hunk #1 applied cleanly.
Rejected hunk #2.
Applied patch drivers/common/sfc_efx/base/rhead_rx.c cleanly.
hint: Use 'git am --show-current-patch' to see the failed patch
diff a/drivers/common/sfc_efx/base/ef10_filter.c b/drivers/common/sfc_efx/base/ef10_filter.c (rejected hunks)
@@ -338,6 +338,11 @@ efx_mcdi_filter_op_add(
FILTER_OP_V3_IN_MATCH_SET_FLAG, 1);
}
+ if (spec->efs_flags & EFX_FILTER_FLAG_VLAN_STRIP) {
+ MCDI_IN_SET_DWORD_FIELD(req, FILTER_OP_V3_IN_MATCH_ACTION_FLAGS,
+ FILTER_OP_V3_IN_MATCH_STRIP_VLAN, 1);
+ }
+
efx_mcdi_execute(enp, &req);
if (req.emr_rc != 0) {
diff a/drivers/common/sfc_efx/base/efx_rx.c b/drivers/common/sfc_efx/base/efx_rx.c (rejected hunks)
@@ -943,11 +944,27 @@ efx_rx_qcreate_internal(
}
}
+ if (flags & EFX_RXQ_FLAG_VLAN_STRIP) {
+ const efx_rx_prefix_layout_t *erplp = &erp->er_prefix_layout;
+ const efx_rx_prefix_field_info_t *vlan_tci_field;
+
+ vlan_tci_field =
+ &erplp->erpl_fields[EFX_RX_PREFIX_FIELD_VLAN_STRIP_TCI];
+ if (vlan_tci_field->erpfi_width_bits == 0) {
+ rc = ENOTSUP;
+ goto fail6;
+ }
+
+ erp->er_flags |= EFX_RXQ_FLAG_VLAN_STRIP;
+ }
+
enp->en_rx_qcount++;
*erpp = erp;
return (0);
+fail6:
+ EFSYS_PROBE(fail6);
fail5:
EFSYS_PROBE(fail5);
Checking patch doc/guides/nics/sfc_efx.rst...
Hunk #1 succeeded at 118 (offset 38 lines).
Hunk #2 succeeded at 134 (offset 40 lines).
Checking patch drivers/net/sfc/sfc_ef100_rx.c...
Checking patch drivers/net/sfc/sfc_rx.c...
error: while searching for:
if (encp->enc_rx_include_fcs_supported == 0)
no_caps |= RTE_ETH_RX_OFFLOAD_KEEP_CRC;
return ~no_caps;
}
error: patch failed: drivers/net/sfc/sfc_rx.c:942
Hunk #2 succeeded at 1186 (offset -7 lines).
Hunk #3 succeeded at 1698 (offset -7 lines).
Applied patch doc/guides/nics/sfc_efx.rst cleanly.
Applied patch drivers/net/sfc/sfc_ef100_rx.c cleanly.
Applying patch drivers/net/sfc/sfc_rx.c with 1 reject...
Rejected hunk #1.
Hunk #2 applied cleanly.
Hunk #3 applied cleanly.
hint: Use 'git am --show-current-patch' to see the failed patch
diff a/drivers/net/sfc/sfc_rx.c b/drivers/net/sfc/sfc_rx.c (rejected hunks)
@@ -942,6 +942,9 @@ sfc_rx_get_offload_mask(struct sfc_adapter *sa)
if (encp->enc_rx_include_fcs_supported == 0)
no_caps |= RTE_ETH_RX_OFFLOAD_KEEP_CRC;
+ if (encp->enc_rx_vlan_stripping == 0)
+ no_caps |= RTE_ETH_RX_OFFLOAD_VLAN_STRIP;
+
return ~no_caps;
}
https://lab.dpdk.org/results/dashboard/patchsets/26474/
UNH-IOL DPDK Community Lab
next reply other threads:[~2023-06-09 22:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-06-09 22:50 dpdklab [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2023-06-11 18:18 dpdklab
2023-06-11 18:03 dpdklab
2023-06-11 17:49 dpdklab
2023-06-10 19:16 dpdklab
2023-05-31 14:00 dpdklab
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=6483aca4.0d0a0220.8625e.befaSMTPIN_ADDED_MISSING@mx.google.com \
--to=dpdklab@iol.unh.edu \
--cc=dpdk-test-reports@iol.unh.edu \
--cc=test-report@dpdk.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).