* |WARNING| pw127823-127825 [PATCH] [v2, 3/3] net/sfc: support VLAN stripping offload
@ 2023-06-11 18:11 dpdklab
0 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: dpdklab @ 2023-06-11 18:11 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: test-report; +Cc: dpdk-test-reports
Test-Label: iol-testing
Test-Status: WARNING
http://dpdk.org/patch/127823
_apply patch failure_
Submitter: Artemii Morozov <Artemii.Morozov@arknetworks.am>
Date: Thursday, June 01 2023 08:12:03
Applied on: CommitID:c9df59bcc9bec67783de98486879594e52bdc418
Apply patch set 127823-127825 failed:
Checking patch drivers/common/sfc_efx/base/ef10_filter.c...
error: while searching for:
FILTER_OP_V3_IN_MATCH_SET_FLAG, 1);
}
efx_mcdi_execute(enp, &req);
if (req.emr_rc != 0) {
error: patch failed: drivers/common/sfc_efx/base/ef10_filter.c:338
Hunk #2 succeeded at 852 (offset -5 lines).
Hunk #3 succeeded at 2020 (offset -5 lines).
Hunk #4 succeeded at 2155 (offset -5 lines).
Hunk #5 succeeded at 2168 (offset -5 lines).
Checking patch drivers/common/sfc_efx/base/ef10_impl.h...
Hunk #1 succeeded at 1286 (offset -1 lines).
Checking patch drivers/common/sfc_efx/base/efx.h...
Checking patch drivers/common/sfc_efx/base/efx_filter.c...
Checking patch drivers/common/sfc_efx/base/efx_impl.h...
Checking patch drivers/common/sfc_efx/base/efx_rx.c...
error: while searching for:
}
}
enp->en_rx_qcount++;
*erpp = erp;
return (0);
fail5:
EFSYS_PROBE(fail5);
error: patch failed: drivers/common/sfc_efx/base/efx_rx.c:943
Checking patch drivers/common/sfc_efx/base/rhead_rx.c...
Applying patch drivers/common/sfc_efx/base/ef10_filter.c with 1 reject...
Rejected hunk #1.
Hunk #2 applied cleanly.
Hunk #3 applied cleanly.
Hunk #4 applied cleanly.
Hunk #5 applied cleanly.
Applied patch drivers/common/sfc_efx/base/ef10_impl.h cleanly.
Applied patch drivers/common/sfc_efx/base/efx.h cleanly.
Applied patch drivers/common/sfc_efx/base/efx_filter.c cleanly.
Applied patch drivers/common/sfc_efx/base/efx_impl.h cleanly.
Applying patch drivers/common/sfc_efx/base/efx_rx.c with 1 reject...
Hunk #1 applied cleanly.
Rejected hunk #2.
Applied patch drivers/common/sfc_efx/base/rhead_rx.c cleanly.
hint: Use 'git am --show-current-patch' to see the failed patch
diff a/drivers/common/sfc_efx/base/ef10_filter.c b/drivers/common/sfc_efx/base/ef10_filter.c (rejected hunks)
@@ -338,6 +338,11 @@ efx_mcdi_filter_op_add(
FILTER_OP_V3_IN_MATCH_SET_FLAG, 1);
}
+ if (spec->efs_flags & EFX_FILTER_FLAG_VLAN_STRIP) {
+ MCDI_IN_SET_DWORD_FIELD(req, FILTER_OP_V3_IN_MATCH_ACTION_FLAGS,
+ FILTER_OP_V3_IN_MATCH_STRIP_VLAN, 1);
+ }
+
efx_mcdi_execute(enp, &req);
if (req.emr_rc != 0) {
diff a/drivers/common/sfc_efx/base/efx_rx.c b/drivers/common/sfc_efx/base/efx_rx.c (rejected hunks)
@@ -943,11 +944,27 @@ efx_rx_qcreate_internal(
}
}
+ if (flags & EFX_RXQ_FLAG_VLAN_STRIP) {
+ const efx_rx_prefix_layout_t *erplp = &erp->er_prefix_layout;
+ const efx_rx_prefix_field_info_t *vlan_tci_field;
+
+ vlan_tci_field =
+ &erplp->erpl_fields[EFX_RX_PREFIX_FIELD_VLAN_STRIP_TCI];
+ if (vlan_tci_field->erpfi_width_bits == 0) {
+ rc = ENOTSUP;
+ goto fail6;
+ }
+
+ erp->er_flags |= EFX_RXQ_FLAG_VLAN_STRIP;
+ }
+
enp->en_rx_qcount++;
*erpp = erp;
return (0);
+fail6:
+ EFSYS_PROBE(fail6);
fail5:
EFSYS_PROBE(fail5);
Checking patch doc/guides/nics/sfc_efx.rst...
Checking patch drivers/net/sfc/sfc_ef100_rx.c...
error: while searching for:
else
rxq->flags &= ~SFC_EF100_RXQ_USER_MARK;
/*
* At the moment, this feature is used only
error: patch failed: drivers/net/sfc/sfc_ef100_rx.c:879
Hunk #5 succeeded at 1007 (offset -15 lines).
Checking patch drivers/net/sfc/sfc_rx.c...
Hunk #3 succeeded at 1701 (offset -3 lines).
Applied patch doc/guides/nics/sfc_efx.rst cleanly.
Applying patch drivers/net/sfc/sfc_ef100_rx.c with 1 reject...
Hunk #1 applied cleanly.
Hunk #2 applied cleanly.
Hunk #3 applied cleanly.
Rejected hunk #4.
Hunk #5 applied cleanly.
Applied patch drivers/net/sfc/sfc_rx.c cleanly.
hint: Use 'git am --show-current-patch' to see the failed patch
diff a/drivers/net/sfc/sfc_ef100_rx.c b/drivers/net/sfc/sfc_ef100_rx.c (rejected hunks)
@@ -879,6 +892,11 @@ sfc_ef100_rx_qstart(struct sfc_dp_rxq *dp_rxq, unsigned int evq_read_ptr,
else
rxq->flags &= ~SFC_EF100_RXQ_USER_MARK;
+ if ((unsup_rx_prefix_fields &
+ (1U << EFX_RX_PREFIX_FIELD_VLAN_STRIP_TCI)) == 0)
+ rxq->flags |= SFC_EF100_RXQ_VLAN_STRIP;
+ else
+ rxq->flags &= ~SFC_EF100_RXQ_VLAN_STRIP;
/*
* At the moment, this feature is used only
https://lab.dpdk.org/results/dashboard/patchsets/26483/
UNH-IOL DPDK Community Lab
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* |WARNING| pw127823-127825 [PATCH] [v2, 3/3] net/sfc: support VLAN stripping offload
@ 2023-06-11 17:56 dpdklab
0 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: dpdklab @ 2023-06-11 17:56 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: test-report; +Cc: dpdk-test-reports
Test-Label: iol-testing
Test-Status: WARNING
http://dpdk.org/patch/127823
_apply patch failure_
Submitter: Artemii Morozov <Artemii.Morozov@arknetworks.am>
Date: Thursday, June 01 2023 08:12:03
Applied on: CommitID:c9df59bcc9bec67783de98486879594e52bdc418
Apply patch set 127823-127825 failed:
Checking patch drivers/common/sfc_efx/base/ef10_filter.c...
error: while searching for:
FILTER_OP_V3_IN_MATCH_SET_FLAG, 1);
}
efx_mcdi_execute(enp, &req);
if (req.emr_rc != 0) {
error: patch failed: drivers/common/sfc_efx/base/ef10_filter.c:338
Hunk #2 succeeded at 852 (offset -5 lines).
Hunk #3 succeeded at 2020 (offset -5 lines).
Hunk #4 succeeded at 2155 (offset -5 lines).
Hunk #5 succeeded at 2168 (offset -5 lines).
Checking patch drivers/common/sfc_efx/base/ef10_impl.h...
Hunk #1 succeeded at 1286 (offset -1 lines).
Checking patch drivers/common/sfc_efx/base/efx.h...
Checking patch drivers/common/sfc_efx/base/efx_filter.c...
Checking patch drivers/common/sfc_efx/base/efx_impl.h...
Checking patch drivers/common/sfc_efx/base/efx_rx.c...
error: while searching for:
}
}
enp->en_rx_qcount++;
*erpp = erp;
return (0);
fail5:
EFSYS_PROBE(fail5);
error: patch failed: drivers/common/sfc_efx/base/efx_rx.c:943
Checking patch drivers/common/sfc_efx/base/rhead_rx.c...
Applying patch drivers/common/sfc_efx/base/ef10_filter.c with 1 reject...
Rejected hunk #1.
Hunk #2 applied cleanly.
Hunk #3 applied cleanly.
Hunk #4 applied cleanly.
Hunk #5 applied cleanly.
Applied patch drivers/common/sfc_efx/base/ef10_impl.h cleanly.
Applied patch drivers/common/sfc_efx/base/efx.h cleanly.
Applied patch drivers/common/sfc_efx/base/efx_filter.c cleanly.
Applied patch drivers/common/sfc_efx/base/efx_impl.h cleanly.
Applying patch drivers/common/sfc_efx/base/efx_rx.c with 1 reject...
Hunk #1 applied cleanly.
Rejected hunk #2.
Applied patch drivers/common/sfc_efx/base/rhead_rx.c cleanly.
hint: Use 'git am --show-current-patch' to see the failed patch
diff a/drivers/common/sfc_efx/base/ef10_filter.c b/drivers/common/sfc_efx/base/ef10_filter.c (rejected hunks)
@@ -338,6 +338,11 @@ efx_mcdi_filter_op_add(
FILTER_OP_V3_IN_MATCH_SET_FLAG, 1);
}
+ if (spec->efs_flags & EFX_FILTER_FLAG_VLAN_STRIP) {
+ MCDI_IN_SET_DWORD_FIELD(req, FILTER_OP_V3_IN_MATCH_ACTION_FLAGS,
+ FILTER_OP_V3_IN_MATCH_STRIP_VLAN, 1);
+ }
+
efx_mcdi_execute(enp, &req);
if (req.emr_rc != 0) {
diff a/drivers/common/sfc_efx/base/efx_rx.c b/drivers/common/sfc_efx/base/efx_rx.c (rejected hunks)
@@ -943,11 +944,27 @@ efx_rx_qcreate_internal(
}
}
+ if (flags & EFX_RXQ_FLAG_VLAN_STRIP) {
+ const efx_rx_prefix_layout_t *erplp = &erp->er_prefix_layout;
+ const efx_rx_prefix_field_info_t *vlan_tci_field;
+
+ vlan_tci_field =
+ &erplp->erpl_fields[EFX_RX_PREFIX_FIELD_VLAN_STRIP_TCI];
+ if (vlan_tci_field->erpfi_width_bits == 0) {
+ rc = ENOTSUP;
+ goto fail6;
+ }
+
+ erp->er_flags |= EFX_RXQ_FLAG_VLAN_STRIP;
+ }
+
enp->en_rx_qcount++;
*erpp = erp;
return (0);
+fail6:
+ EFSYS_PROBE(fail6);
fail5:
EFSYS_PROBE(fail5);
Checking patch doc/guides/nics/sfc_efx.rst...
Checking patch drivers/net/sfc/sfc_ef100_rx.c...
error: while searching for:
else
rxq->flags &= ~SFC_EF100_RXQ_USER_MARK;
/*
* At the moment, this feature is used only
error: patch failed: drivers/net/sfc/sfc_ef100_rx.c:879
Hunk #5 succeeded at 1007 (offset -15 lines).
Checking patch drivers/net/sfc/sfc_rx.c...
Hunk #3 succeeded at 1701 (offset -3 lines).
Applied patch doc/guides/nics/sfc_efx.rst cleanly.
Applying patch drivers/net/sfc/sfc_ef100_rx.c with 1 reject...
Hunk #1 applied cleanly.
Hunk #2 applied cleanly.
Hunk #3 applied cleanly.
Rejected hunk #4.
Hunk #5 applied cleanly.
Applied patch drivers/net/sfc/sfc_rx.c cleanly.
hint: Use 'git am --show-current-patch' to see the failed patch
diff a/drivers/net/sfc/sfc_ef100_rx.c b/drivers/net/sfc/sfc_ef100_rx.c (rejected hunks)
@@ -879,6 +892,11 @@ sfc_ef100_rx_qstart(struct sfc_dp_rxq *dp_rxq, unsigned int evq_read_ptr,
else
rxq->flags &= ~SFC_EF100_RXQ_USER_MARK;
+ if ((unsup_rx_prefix_fields &
+ (1U << EFX_RX_PREFIX_FIELD_VLAN_STRIP_TCI)) == 0)
+ rxq->flags |= SFC_EF100_RXQ_VLAN_STRIP;
+ else
+ rxq->flags &= ~SFC_EF100_RXQ_VLAN_STRIP;
/*
* At the moment, this feature is used only
https://lab.dpdk.org/results/dashboard/patchsets/26483/
UNH-IOL DPDK Community Lab
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* |WARNING| pw127823-127825 [PATCH] [v2, 3/3] net/sfc: support VLAN stripping offload
@ 2023-06-10 18:59 dpdklab
0 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: dpdklab @ 2023-06-10 18:59 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: test-report; +Cc: dpdk-test-reports
Test-Label: iol-testing
Test-Status: WARNING
http://dpdk.org/patch/127823
_apply patch failure_
Submitter: Artemii Morozov <Artemii.Morozov@arknetworks.am>
Date: Thursday, June 01 2023 08:12:03
Applied on: CommitID:c9df59bcc9bec67783de98486879594e52bdc418
Apply patch set 127823-127825 failed:
Checking patch drivers/common/sfc_efx/base/ef10_filter.c...
error: while searching for:
FILTER_OP_V3_IN_MATCH_SET_FLAG, 1);
}
efx_mcdi_execute(enp, &req);
if (req.emr_rc != 0) {
error: patch failed: drivers/common/sfc_efx/base/ef10_filter.c:338
Hunk #2 succeeded at 852 (offset -5 lines).
Hunk #3 succeeded at 2020 (offset -5 lines).
Hunk #4 succeeded at 2155 (offset -5 lines).
Hunk #5 succeeded at 2168 (offset -5 lines).
Checking patch drivers/common/sfc_efx/base/ef10_impl.h...
Hunk #1 succeeded at 1286 (offset -1 lines).
Checking patch drivers/common/sfc_efx/base/efx.h...
Checking patch drivers/common/sfc_efx/base/efx_filter.c...
Checking patch drivers/common/sfc_efx/base/efx_impl.h...
Checking patch drivers/common/sfc_efx/base/efx_rx.c...
error: while searching for:
}
}
enp->en_rx_qcount++;
*erpp = erp;
return (0);
fail5:
EFSYS_PROBE(fail5);
error: patch failed: drivers/common/sfc_efx/base/efx_rx.c:943
Checking patch drivers/common/sfc_efx/base/rhead_rx.c...
Applying patch drivers/common/sfc_efx/base/ef10_filter.c with 1 reject...
Rejected hunk #1.
Hunk #2 applied cleanly.
Hunk #3 applied cleanly.
Hunk #4 applied cleanly.
Hunk #5 applied cleanly.
Applied patch drivers/common/sfc_efx/base/ef10_impl.h cleanly.
Applied patch drivers/common/sfc_efx/base/efx.h cleanly.
Applied patch drivers/common/sfc_efx/base/efx_filter.c cleanly.
Applied patch drivers/common/sfc_efx/base/efx_impl.h cleanly.
Applying patch drivers/common/sfc_efx/base/efx_rx.c with 1 reject...
Hunk #1 applied cleanly.
Rejected hunk #2.
Applied patch drivers/common/sfc_efx/base/rhead_rx.c cleanly.
hint: Use 'git am --show-current-patch' to see the failed patch
diff a/drivers/common/sfc_efx/base/ef10_filter.c b/drivers/common/sfc_efx/base/ef10_filter.c (rejected hunks)
@@ -338,6 +338,11 @@ efx_mcdi_filter_op_add(
FILTER_OP_V3_IN_MATCH_SET_FLAG, 1);
}
+ if (spec->efs_flags & EFX_FILTER_FLAG_VLAN_STRIP) {
+ MCDI_IN_SET_DWORD_FIELD(req, FILTER_OP_V3_IN_MATCH_ACTION_FLAGS,
+ FILTER_OP_V3_IN_MATCH_STRIP_VLAN, 1);
+ }
+
efx_mcdi_execute(enp, &req);
if (req.emr_rc != 0) {
diff a/drivers/common/sfc_efx/base/efx_rx.c b/drivers/common/sfc_efx/base/efx_rx.c (rejected hunks)
@@ -943,11 +944,27 @@ efx_rx_qcreate_internal(
}
}
+ if (flags & EFX_RXQ_FLAG_VLAN_STRIP) {
+ const efx_rx_prefix_layout_t *erplp = &erp->er_prefix_layout;
+ const efx_rx_prefix_field_info_t *vlan_tci_field;
+
+ vlan_tci_field =
+ &erplp->erpl_fields[EFX_RX_PREFIX_FIELD_VLAN_STRIP_TCI];
+ if (vlan_tci_field->erpfi_width_bits == 0) {
+ rc = ENOTSUP;
+ goto fail6;
+ }
+
+ erp->er_flags |= EFX_RXQ_FLAG_VLAN_STRIP;
+ }
+
enp->en_rx_qcount++;
*erpp = erp;
return (0);
+fail6:
+ EFSYS_PROBE(fail6);
fail5:
EFSYS_PROBE(fail5);
Checking patch doc/guides/nics/sfc_efx.rst...
Checking patch drivers/net/sfc/sfc_ef100_rx.c...
error: while searching for:
else
rxq->flags &= ~SFC_EF100_RXQ_USER_MARK;
/*
* At the moment, this feature is used only
error: patch failed: drivers/net/sfc/sfc_ef100_rx.c:879
Hunk #5 succeeded at 1007 (offset -15 lines).
Checking patch drivers/net/sfc/sfc_rx.c...
Hunk #3 succeeded at 1701 (offset -3 lines).
Applied patch doc/guides/nics/sfc_efx.rst cleanly.
Applying patch drivers/net/sfc/sfc_ef100_rx.c with 1 reject...
Hunk #1 applied cleanly.
Hunk #2 applied cleanly.
Hunk #3 applied cleanly.
Rejected hunk #4.
Hunk #5 applied cleanly.
Applied patch drivers/net/sfc/sfc_rx.c cleanly.
hint: Use 'git am --show-current-patch' to see the failed patch
diff a/drivers/net/sfc/sfc_ef100_rx.c b/drivers/net/sfc/sfc_ef100_rx.c (rejected hunks)
@@ -879,6 +892,11 @@ sfc_ef100_rx_qstart(struct sfc_dp_rxq *dp_rxq, unsigned int evq_read_ptr,
else
rxq->flags &= ~SFC_EF100_RXQ_USER_MARK;
+ if ((unsup_rx_prefix_fields &
+ (1U << EFX_RX_PREFIX_FIELD_VLAN_STRIP_TCI)) == 0)
+ rxq->flags |= SFC_EF100_RXQ_VLAN_STRIP;
+ else
+ rxq->flags &= ~SFC_EF100_RXQ_VLAN_STRIP;
/*
* At the moment, this feature is used only
https://lab.dpdk.org/results/dashboard/patchsets/26483/
UNH-IOL DPDK Community Lab
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* |WARNING| pw127823-127825 [PATCH] [v2, 3/3] net/sfc: support VLAN stripping offload
@ 2023-06-09 22:38 dpdklab
0 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: dpdklab @ 2023-06-09 22:38 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: test-report; +Cc: dpdk-test-reports
Test-Label: iol-testing
Test-Status: WARNING
http://dpdk.org/patch/127823
_apply patch failure_
Submitter: Artemii Morozov <Artemii.Morozov@arknetworks.am>
Date: Thursday, June 01 2023 08:12:03
Applied on: CommitID:c9df59bcc9bec67783de98486879594e52bdc418
Apply patch set 127823-127825 failed:
Checking patch drivers/common/sfc_efx/base/ef10_filter.c...
error: while searching for:
FILTER_OP_V3_IN_MATCH_SET_FLAG, 1);
}
efx_mcdi_execute(enp, &req);
if (req.emr_rc != 0) {
error: patch failed: drivers/common/sfc_efx/base/ef10_filter.c:338
Hunk #2 succeeded at 852 (offset -5 lines).
Hunk #3 succeeded at 2020 (offset -5 lines).
Hunk #4 succeeded at 2155 (offset -5 lines).
Hunk #5 succeeded at 2168 (offset -5 lines).
Checking patch drivers/common/sfc_efx/base/ef10_impl.h...
Hunk #1 succeeded at 1286 (offset -1 lines).
Checking patch drivers/common/sfc_efx/base/efx.h...
Checking patch drivers/common/sfc_efx/base/efx_filter.c...
Checking patch drivers/common/sfc_efx/base/efx_impl.h...
Checking patch drivers/common/sfc_efx/base/efx_rx.c...
error: while searching for:
}
}
enp->en_rx_qcount++;
*erpp = erp;
return (0);
fail5:
EFSYS_PROBE(fail5);
error: patch failed: drivers/common/sfc_efx/base/efx_rx.c:943
Checking patch drivers/common/sfc_efx/base/rhead_rx.c...
Applying patch drivers/common/sfc_efx/base/ef10_filter.c with 1 reject...
Rejected hunk #1.
Hunk #2 applied cleanly.
Hunk #3 applied cleanly.
Hunk #4 applied cleanly.
Hunk #5 applied cleanly.
Applied patch drivers/common/sfc_efx/base/ef10_impl.h cleanly.
Applied patch drivers/common/sfc_efx/base/efx.h cleanly.
Applied patch drivers/common/sfc_efx/base/efx_filter.c cleanly.
Applied patch drivers/common/sfc_efx/base/efx_impl.h cleanly.
Applying patch drivers/common/sfc_efx/base/efx_rx.c with 1 reject...
Hunk #1 applied cleanly.
Rejected hunk #2.
Applied patch drivers/common/sfc_efx/base/rhead_rx.c cleanly.
hint: Use 'git am --show-current-patch' to see the failed patch
diff a/drivers/common/sfc_efx/base/ef10_filter.c b/drivers/common/sfc_efx/base/ef10_filter.c (rejected hunks)
@@ -338,6 +338,11 @@ efx_mcdi_filter_op_add(
FILTER_OP_V3_IN_MATCH_SET_FLAG, 1);
}
+ if (spec->efs_flags & EFX_FILTER_FLAG_VLAN_STRIP) {
+ MCDI_IN_SET_DWORD_FIELD(req, FILTER_OP_V3_IN_MATCH_ACTION_FLAGS,
+ FILTER_OP_V3_IN_MATCH_STRIP_VLAN, 1);
+ }
+
efx_mcdi_execute(enp, &req);
if (req.emr_rc != 0) {
diff a/drivers/common/sfc_efx/base/efx_rx.c b/drivers/common/sfc_efx/base/efx_rx.c (rejected hunks)
@@ -943,11 +944,27 @@ efx_rx_qcreate_internal(
}
}
+ if (flags & EFX_RXQ_FLAG_VLAN_STRIP) {
+ const efx_rx_prefix_layout_t *erplp = &erp->er_prefix_layout;
+ const efx_rx_prefix_field_info_t *vlan_tci_field;
+
+ vlan_tci_field =
+ &erplp->erpl_fields[EFX_RX_PREFIX_FIELD_VLAN_STRIP_TCI];
+ if (vlan_tci_field->erpfi_width_bits == 0) {
+ rc = ENOTSUP;
+ goto fail6;
+ }
+
+ erp->er_flags |= EFX_RXQ_FLAG_VLAN_STRIP;
+ }
+
enp->en_rx_qcount++;
*erpp = erp;
return (0);
+fail6:
+ EFSYS_PROBE(fail6);
fail5:
EFSYS_PROBE(fail5);
Checking patch doc/guides/nics/sfc_efx.rst...
Checking patch drivers/net/sfc/sfc_ef100_rx.c...
error: while searching for:
else
rxq->flags &= ~SFC_EF100_RXQ_USER_MARK;
/*
* At the moment, this feature is used only
error: patch failed: drivers/net/sfc/sfc_ef100_rx.c:879
Hunk #5 succeeded at 1007 (offset -15 lines).
Checking patch drivers/net/sfc/sfc_rx.c...
Hunk #3 succeeded at 1701 (offset -3 lines).
Applied patch doc/guides/nics/sfc_efx.rst cleanly.
Applying patch drivers/net/sfc/sfc_ef100_rx.c with 1 reject...
Hunk #1 applied cleanly.
Hunk #2 applied cleanly.
Hunk #3 applied cleanly.
Rejected hunk #4.
Hunk #5 applied cleanly.
Applied patch drivers/net/sfc/sfc_rx.c cleanly.
hint: Use 'git am --show-current-patch' to see the failed patch
diff a/drivers/net/sfc/sfc_ef100_rx.c b/drivers/net/sfc/sfc_ef100_rx.c (rejected hunks)
@@ -879,6 +892,11 @@ sfc_ef100_rx_qstart(struct sfc_dp_rxq *dp_rxq, unsigned int evq_read_ptr,
else
rxq->flags &= ~SFC_EF100_RXQ_USER_MARK;
+ if ((unsup_rx_prefix_fields &
+ (1U << EFX_RX_PREFIX_FIELD_VLAN_STRIP_TCI)) == 0)
+ rxq->flags |= SFC_EF100_RXQ_VLAN_STRIP;
+ else
+ rxq->flags &= ~SFC_EF100_RXQ_VLAN_STRIP;
/*
* At the moment, this feature is used only
https://lab.dpdk.org/results/dashboard/patchsets/26483/
UNH-IOL DPDK Community Lab
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* |WARNING| pw127823-127825 [PATCH] [v2, 3/3] net/sfc: support VLAN stripping offload
@ 2023-06-01 8:39 dpdklab
0 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: dpdklab @ 2023-06-01 8:39 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: test-report; +Cc: dpdk-test-reports
Test-Label: iol-testing
Test-Status: WARNING
http://dpdk.org/patch/127823
_apply patch failure_
Submitter: Artemii Morozov <Artemii.Morozov@arknetworks.am>
Date: Thursday, June 01 2023 08:12:03
Applied on: CommitID:c9df59bcc9bec67783de98486879594e52bdc418
Apply patch set 127823-127825 failed:
Checking patch drivers/common/sfc_efx/base/ef10_filter.c...
error: while searching for:
FILTER_OP_V3_IN_MATCH_SET_FLAG, 1);
}
efx_mcdi_execute(enp, &req);
if (req.emr_rc != 0) {
error: patch failed: drivers/common/sfc_efx/base/ef10_filter.c:338
Hunk #2 succeeded at 852 (offset -5 lines).
Hunk #3 succeeded at 2020 (offset -5 lines).
Hunk #4 succeeded at 2155 (offset -5 lines).
Hunk #5 succeeded at 2168 (offset -5 lines).
Checking patch drivers/common/sfc_efx/base/ef10_impl.h...
Hunk #1 succeeded at 1286 (offset -1 lines).
Checking patch drivers/common/sfc_efx/base/efx.h...
Checking patch drivers/common/sfc_efx/base/efx_filter.c...
Checking patch drivers/common/sfc_efx/base/efx_impl.h...
Checking patch drivers/common/sfc_efx/base/efx_rx.c...
error: while searching for:
}
}
enp->en_rx_qcount++;
*erpp = erp;
return (0);
fail5:
EFSYS_PROBE(fail5);
error: patch failed: drivers/common/sfc_efx/base/efx_rx.c:943
Checking patch drivers/common/sfc_efx/base/rhead_rx.c...
Applying patch drivers/common/sfc_efx/base/ef10_filter.c with 1 reject...
Rejected hunk #1.
Hunk #2 applied cleanly.
Hunk #3 applied cleanly.
Hunk #4 applied cleanly.
Hunk #5 applied cleanly.
Applied patch drivers/common/sfc_efx/base/ef10_impl.h cleanly.
Applied patch drivers/common/sfc_efx/base/efx.h cleanly.
Applied patch drivers/common/sfc_efx/base/efx_filter.c cleanly.
Applied patch drivers/common/sfc_efx/base/efx_impl.h cleanly.
Applying patch drivers/common/sfc_efx/base/efx_rx.c with 1 reject...
Hunk #1 applied cleanly.
Rejected hunk #2.
Applied patch drivers/common/sfc_efx/base/rhead_rx.c cleanly.
hint: Use 'git am --show-current-patch' to see the failed patch
diff a/drivers/common/sfc_efx/base/ef10_filter.c b/drivers/common/sfc_efx/base/ef10_filter.c (rejected hunks)
@@ -338,6 +338,11 @@ efx_mcdi_filter_op_add(
FILTER_OP_V3_IN_MATCH_SET_FLAG, 1);
}
+ if (spec->efs_flags & EFX_FILTER_FLAG_VLAN_STRIP) {
+ MCDI_IN_SET_DWORD_FIELD(req, FILTER_OP_V3_IN_MATCH_ACTION_FLAGS,
+ FILTER_OP_V3_IN_MATCH_STRIP_VLAN, 1);
+ }
+
efx_mcdi_execute(enp, &req);
if (req.emr_rc != 0) {
diff a/drivers/common/sfc_efx/base/efx_rx.c b/drivers/common/sfc_efx/base/efx_rx.c (rejected hunks)
@@ -943,11 +944,27 @@ efx_rx_qcreate_internal(
}
}
+ if (flags & EFX_RXQ_FLAG_VLAN_STRIP) {
+ const efx_rx_prefix_layout_t *erplp = &erp->er_prefix_layout;
+ const efx_rx_prefix_field_info_t *vlan_tci_field;
+
+ vlan_tci_field =
+ &erplp->erpl_fields[EFX_RX_PREFIX_FIELD_VLAN_STRIP_TCI];
+ if (vlan_tci_field->erpfi_width_bits == 0) {
+ rc = ENOTSUP;
+ goto fail6;
+ }
+
+ erp->er_flags |= EFX_RXQ_FLAG_VLAN_STRIP;
+ }
+
enp->en_rx_qcount++;
*erpp = erp;
return (0);
+fail6:
+ EFSYS_PROBE(fail6);
fail5:
EFSYS_PROBE(fail5);
Checking patch doc/guides/nics/sfc_efx.rst...
Checking patch drivers/net/sfc/sfc_ef100_rx.c...
error: while searching for:
else
rxq->flags &= ~SFC_EF100_RXQ_USER_MARK;
/*
* At the moment, this feature is used only
error: patch failed: drivers/net/sfc/sfc_ef100_rx.c:879
Hunk #5 succeeded at 1007 (offset -15 lines).
Checking patch drivers/net/sfc/sfc_rx.c...
Hunk #3 succeeded at 1701 (offset -3 lines).
Applied patch doc/guides/nics/sfc_efx.rst cleanly.
Applying patch drivers/net/sfc/sfc_ef100_rx.c with 1 reject...
Hunk #1 applied cleanly.
Hunk #2 applied cleanly.
Hunk #3 applied cleanly.
Rejected hunk #4.
Hunk #5 applied cleanly.
Applied patch drivers/net/sfc/sfc_rx.c cleanly.
hint: Use 'git am --show-current-patch' to see the failed patch
diff a/drivers/net/sfc/sfc_ef100_rx.c b/drivers/net/sfc/sfc_ef100_rx.c (rejected hunks)
@@ -879,6 +892,11 @@ sfc_ef100_rx_qstart(struct sfc_dp_rxq *dp_rxq, unsigned int evq_read_ptr,
else
rxq->flags &= ~SFC_EF100_RXQ_USER_MARK;
+ if ((unsup_rx_prefix_fields &
+ (1U << EFX_RX_PREFIX_FIELD_VLAN_STRIP_TCI)) == 0)
+ rxq->flags |= SFC_EF100_RXQ_VLAN_STRIP;
+ else
+ rxq->flags &= ~SFC_EF100_RXQ_VLAN_STRIP;
/*
* At the moment, this feature is used only
https://lab.dpdk.org/results/dashboard/patchsets/26483/
UNH-IOL DPDK Community Lab
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2023-06-11 18:11 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2023-06-11 18:11 |WARNING| pw127823-127825 [PATCH] [v2, 3/3] net/sfc: support VLAN stripping offload dpdklab
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2023-06-11 17:56 dpdklab
2023-06-10 18:59 dpdklab
2023-06-09 22:38 dpdklab
2023-06-01 8:39 dpdklab
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).