DPDK usage discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [dpdk-users] Understanding ip_pipeline thread headroom
@ 2018-02-01 12:08 longtb5
  0 siblings, 0 replies; only message in thread
From: longtb5 @ 2018-02-01 12:08 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: users; +Cc: roy.fan.zhang, cristian.dumitrescu

Hi,

The `thread` command in the ip_pipeline application is not documented. By
chance, I found in git log this interesting functionality.

> examples/ip_pipeline: measure CPU utilization
>
> This patch adds CPU utilization measurement and idle cycle rate
> computation to packet framework. The measurement is done by measuring
> the cycles spent while a thread pulls zero packet from RX queue. These
> cycles are treated as idle cycles (or headroom). A CLI command is added
> to display idle cycle rate of specific thread. The CLI command format is
> shown as following:
>
> t <thread_id> headroom

This command seems to be useful for power management. However I'm not quite
sure how to interpret the reported percentage of `thread headroom`. For
example, when I have ip_pipeline receiving packets at line rate, thread
headroom value for every pipeline module is close to 0%, as expected. But
when I send no packet at all, this value doesn't go up above 60%. In fact,
pipeline master reports a value of around 80%, when it doesn't receive or
process packets at all. Shouldn't it be 100%?

Please let me know if I misunderstood anything.

Thanks,
-BL

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] only message in thread

only message in thread, other threads:[~2018-02-01 12:08 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: (only message) (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2018-02-01 12:08 [dpdk-users] Understanding ip_pipeline thread headroom longtb5

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).