From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from dpdk.org (dpdk.org [92.243.14.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 13251A329E for ; Thu, 24 Oct 2019 05:05:56 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [92.243.14.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 967031C1A3; Thu, 24 Oct 2019 05:05:55 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mail-pf1-f171.google.com (mail-pf1-f171.google.com [209.85.210.171]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3FCDA1C1A2 for ; Thu, 24 Oct 2019 05:05:54 +0200 (CEST) Received: by mail-pf1-f171.google.com with SMTP id y5so14163561pfo.4 for ; Wed, 23 Oct 2019 20:05:54 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:mime-version:subject:date:references:cc:to:message-id; bh=yvQnqZ/ioCbqDNconWFXsHNEFOF2Be7p3JLOfgK07Aw=; b=Jh4aFVT+gCVpv4ge/8Qv79/s0RAi5VqySD/7OGLPJmC//VA9HuyEHCDqH1sRuqn5d4 OA4QVlSYpTs0xb9Xx/Y0urFgT0tGW/8DSwwxFSy/cf7L8MJbsfLWHdriJc/Wb3f89Mt6 HWiuELiKaOhAw70PWbiFw+oIqjwAFHI+Au7W6+HOBu9tr0udN2CeIGhHRIev5j3tklBv pZfk2XiiB22dAX6bcbi4zOCZRIqeADhCujNZgLki1eo2Pz3U6w1MZOlLmljlqva2akVp yHz+FBn8Bp9YD8k+/RRpsb9x/WaNLeytwZY8CjMy3lgCossYbMhtP221DsgnohIXavvk x/4w== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:mime-version:subject:date:references:cc:to :message-id; bh=yvQnqZ/ioCbqDNconWFXsHNEFOF2Be7p3JLOfgK07Aw=; b=UkFZXsertYqEitsn2e56xCzyDrPqF21xBjn7loxTSd2mRiNvPq3UgT2M5VPTxna7/r dBxsePwS3pf02RZoEkoNgAU9fHnD5TjSJw9QNECNhVZaI9va10jGtp0x+N1eWkQXt2YP NC018Wlo6QeXI9Lw8AYP8Ut55212HVq8ICxTydF2FpLJtUFHRq+NqQWsxTSl7Zr2RimD QhAW6Ha3J9MSFH98hhEaC+SAQ1IAsQRmNP5HFp+DhhopnHHA4n5tmIx20ZsU26mL4XLA i0TbTsnhP/qAVhsr+I9ruEMY4tfJvGiQ9QWUZEAbz7S5iYyREuaRalhHd0eF42NvdVLJ BEwQ== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAVCoGl1wxdGp1PdK9mdmbdHPV6zpmMVd9syjpKzxfsSP0gBoKEp Q2DBn2EH1w2aQRYknrpKHcajfdv/TKg= X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqy6Z1+Z7svHrWl39los4Ea9fL8R6YjTVH/pvsbdp8/UomRHzHOnRSuXBYRTjaw8WOdwCZ0hbg== X-Received: by 2002:a63:f902:: with SMTP id h2mr9087686pgi.246.1571886353375; Wed, 23 Oct 2019 20:05:53 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [10.2.211.140] ([61.120.150.70]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id z18sm200198pfq.182.2019.10.23.20.05.51 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 23 Oct 2019 20:05:52 -0700 (PDT) From: benli ye Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 13.0 \(3594.4.19\)) Date: Thu, 24 Oct 2019 11:05:49 +0800 References: <4C98A13F-7551-4B88-94D4-D2B391C0A968@gmail.com> Cc: users@dpdk.org To: guyifan@protonmail.com Message-Id: <090D9C2A-F2A8-4D9D-849F-FF9071FBF1D8@gmail.com> X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3594.4.19) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.15 Subject: [dpdk-users] Fwd: net/mlx5 statistics related X-BeenThere: users@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK usage discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: users-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "users" Hi Yifan, Try information from this thread. Thanks, Daniel Benli Ye > Begin forwarded message: >=20 > From: benli ye > Subject: Re: net/mlx5 statistics related > Date: August 5, 2019 at 10:30:41 AM GMT+8 > To: Yongseok Koh > Cc: "users@dpdk.org" , Ori Kam , = Dekel Peled , Slava Ovsiienko = , Shahaf Shuler >=20 > Hi Yongseok, >=20 > Thanks for replying. I will have a try. >=20 > Thanks, > Daniel Benli Ye >=20 >=20 >> On Aug 3, 2019, at 5:53 AM, Yongseok Koh wrote: >>=20 >> Hi, >>=20 >> Can you try the following patch, which had been added after 18.11.0 >> I'll try to push it for 18.11.3. >>=20 >> = http://git.dpdk.org/dpdk/commit/?id=3Dce9494d76c478345679abbda2a5606646de9= 886f >>=20 >>=20 >> Thanks, >> Yongseok >>=20 >>> On Jul 28, 2019, at 2:12 AM, benli ye = wrote: >>>=20 >>> Dear Mellanox experts, >>>=20 >>> I am running DPDK 18.11.0 performance test with mlx5 PMD driver on = device ConnectX=C2=AE-4 Lx EN. Our own DPDK app (a Load Balance app) is = used and UDP 64 bytes is generated by tester. >>> We found that when we generated about 2.6Mpps UDP traffic for 1 core = and 2 port setting testbed, our app starts to drops packets. However, = the strange issue is we cannot see any imissed or error statistics from = DPDK layer. >>> I saw the Mellanox test performance result in = https://fast.dpdk.org/doc/perf/DPDK_18_11_Mellanox_NIC_performance_report.= pdf and how do you find packet lose? Is there a bug in statistic = calculation in DPDK or there is another way to trace packet drop? >>> Retrieve DPDK statistics is also used for Intel NIC and the behavior = is right. it should not be wrong for our usage in our own app. >>>=20 >>> Any suggestions would be welcomed. Thanks very much! >>>=20 >>>=20 >>> Bests, >>> Daniel Benli Ye >>=20 >=20