* Re: [dpdk-users] [vpp-dev] vpp-verify-master-opensuse build failure triage
[not found] ` <HE1PR0701MB2572F65064C5ED08388C8E0B813A0@HE1PR0701MB2572.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com>
@ 2017-11-28 10:34 ` Gabriel Ganne
2017-11-28 11:31 ` Marco Varlese
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Gabriel Ganne @ 2017-11-28 10:34 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Marco Varlese, Dave Wallace, Gonzalez Monroy, Sergio, users; +Cc: vpp-dev
Adding dpdk-user ML.
I had a look with an older dpdk archive I found.
The folder archived has been renamed from *dpdk-17.08* to *dpdk-stable-17.08*
This is the only difference, but it is enough to make the md5sum fail.
--
Gabriel Ganne
________________________________
From: Gabriel Ganne
Sent: Tuesday, November 28, 2017 11:13:23 AM
To: Marco Varlese; Dave Wallace; Gonzalez Monroy, Sergio
Cc: vpp-dev@lists.fd.io
Subject: Re: [vpp-dev] vpp-verify-master-opensuse build failure triage
Hi Marco,
I believe http://fast.dpdk.org/rel redirects to http://static.dpdk.org/rel/
I disagree on the md5 hashs.
I have the following (NOK on 17.08, and OK on 17.11) :
$ wget http://static.dpdk.org/rel/dpdk-17.08.tar.xz
$ openssl md5 dpdk-17.08.tar.xz # is 0641f59ea8ea98afefa7cfa2699f6241 in dpdk/Makefile
MD5(dpdk-17.08.tar.xz)= 537ff038915fefd0f210905fafcadb4b
$ wget http://static.dpdk.org/rel/dpdk-17.11.tar.xz
$ openssl md5 dpdk-17.11.tar.xz
MD5(dpdk-17.11.tar.xz)= 53ee9e054a8797c9e67ffa0eb5d0c701
Though I agree that if the "recheck" button made the build pass, there must be something wrong on my side.
... what did I miss ?
--
Gabriel Ganne
________________________________
From: Marco Varlese <mvarlese@suse.de>
Sent: Tuesday, November 28, 2017 10:55:49 AM
To: Gabriel Ganne; Dave Wallace; Gonzalez Monroy, Sergio
Cc: vpp-dev@lists.fd.io
Subject: Re: [vpp-dev] vpp-verify-master-opensuse build failure triage
Hi Gabriel,
On Tue, 2017-11-28 at 09:19 +0000, Gabriel Ganne wrote:
Hi,
I also have this issue on my machine, and I see on http://static.dpdk.org/rel/<https://url10.mailanyone.net/v1/?m=1eJccQ-0000Nh-40&i=57e1b682&c=YXtwE6d2zZdJXheJMCdO_SuDEoEQrdHCdgK6mO-4uDZ2Bj4ObdPrE5Fn6cirFxtZy34K57yMEhszksJbrY2fvTBetWB77s_CJWkpQyyah6_rFbLQmG-dY-qWniIVsFMMRdRMvyqh0lqUak-Q_B9fQ1OiLTvnngJ7HyAk1jgaPeLkV0WU1HDSfBiGhal1ybeY3rdJxuTArJeYn2n4LUfPpkcz-j2_0PTyMVbDfGIpu8o> that dpdk-17.08.tar.xz was written yesterday (27-Nov-2017 13:00)
Wouldn't it be possible that the archive was overwritten ?
The DPDK tarball in VPP is downloaded from http://fast.dpdk.org/rel<https://url10.mailanyone.net/v1/?m=1eJccQ-0000Nh-40&i=57e1b682&c=sI-Qn1OsaRXnxl6lIQOxUZGRD-xaVnPckQwB6CApx-aEpU2UjOwTOfDJA0lq7_Gt1VGQkE6h9MX8Bk9XrgJVo3hCjx0joHpm7zsqXSWsSRqfNFPpowBhGN6XywZqIk3LQZuUWd8ZzZ4GB3xv9bDSmK_j0r1RjBHuNRKrWVhBBEd_Ex_JIhXR3UfOngNNGAe6XmP6AtdokoxpJhyUHUq1pw>
According to http://dpdk.org/rel<https://url10.mailanyone.net/v1/?m=1eJccQ-0000Nh-40&i=57e1b682&c=sI-Qn1OsaRXnxl6lIQOxUZGRD-xaVnPckQwB6CApx-aEpU2UjOwTOfDJA0lq7_Gt1VGQkE6h9MX8Bk9XrgJVo3hCjx0joHpm7zsqXSWsSRqfNFPpowBhGN6XywZqIk3LQZuUWd8ZzZ4GB3xv9bDSmK_j0r1RjBHuNRKrWVhBBEd_Ex_JIhXR3UfOngNNGAe6XmP6AtdokoxpJhyUHUq1pw> the MD5 used in VPP for the DPDK 17.08 release is correct.
In which case, the hash would need to be updated.
Right, if the tarball was a newer and different one then the MD5 hash should be updated in VPP for the the checksum performed...
However, in the case described by Dave below, a simple 'recheck' which triggers a new build (with the same code/scripts/etc. hence the same MD5 hash) solved it.
Also, this would probably not be seen by people who had the dpdk-install-dev package already installed.
Who should I ask to check this ?
I've added Sergio who might have further thoughts on this one.
Best regards
--
Gabriel Ganne
From: vpp-dev-bounces@lists.fd.io <vpp-dev-bounces@lists.fd.io> on behalf of Marco Varlese <mvarlese@suse.de>
Sent: Tuesday, November 28, 2017 9:19:37 AM
To: Dave Wallace
Cc: vpp-dev@lists.fd.io
Subject: Re: [vpp-dev] vpp-verify-master-opensuse build failure triage
Dear Dave,
By the look of it is seemed to have been an hiccup with the download or
that something spurious was left on the filesystem...
===
12:08:13 Bad Checksum! Please remove /w/workspace/vpp-verify-master-
opensuse/dpdk/dpdk-17.08.tar.xz and retry
12:08:13 Makefile:267: recipe for target '/w/workspace/vpp-verify-
master-opensuse/build-root/build-vpp-native/dpdk/.download.ok' failed
12:08:13 make[3]: *** [/w/workspace/vpp-verify-master-opensuse/build-
root/build-vpp-native/dpdk/.download.ok] Error 1
12:08:13 make[3]: Leaving directory '/w/workspace/vpp-verify-master-
opensuse/dpdk'
12:08:13 Makefile:460: recipe for target 'ebuild-build' failed
12:08:13 make[2]: *** [ebuild-build] Error 2
12:08:13 make[2]: Leaving directory '/w/workspace/vpp-verify-master-
opensuse/dpdk'
12:08:13 Makefile:682: recipe for target 'dpdk-build' failed
12:08:13 make[1]: *** [dpdk-build] Error 2
12:08:13 make[1]: Leaving directory '/w/workspace/vpp-verify-master-
opensuse/build-root'
12:08:13 Makefile:333: recipe for target 'build-release' failed
12:08:13 make: *** [build-release] Error 2
12:08:13 Build step 'Execute shell' marked build as failure
===
Since the MD5 checksum on the DPDK tarball fails; to answer your
question, no, it has never happened to me to see this specific issue
before.
I don't think there's anything specific to the openSUSE setup and/or
scripts being executed. I'd rather feel is - as I said earlier -
something to do with an hiccup on the infrastructure side. The fact
that a 'recheck' made it passing I suppose it confirms my current
theory.
An idea: maybe, if it happens again, we might want to ask Vanessa to
see what's the status on the slave-node? Not sure if that could give us
some more insight of what's going on.
Cheers,
Marco
On Mon, 2017-11-27 at 11:04 -0500, Dave Wallace wrote:
> Marco,
>
> Can you please take a look at the build failure encountered with http
> s://gerrit.fd.io/r/#/c/9582/ on the vpp-verify-master-opensuse
> jenkins job:
>
> ----- %< -----
> fd.io JJB 7:56 AM
> Patch Set 2: Verified-1
> Build Failed
> https://jenkins.fd.io/job/vpp-verify-master-opensuse/459/<https://url10.mailanyone.net/v1/?m=1eJccQ-0000Nh-40&i=57e1b682&c=bSD_r9PFEyUeYK2sLQKAy2WL9BnY5kTrXCUuKUrPP9OQ7IBGKhjB5ocTORNFqDvxZSYlHbjt3iggbnpFxgM_Oybv6bXiZXxrK-lf_rZF8zGbD-WZXDzMK7PjFKj9mU8TJRgrL-Lh_HI4zy27A_UbQA7FiZ3rhkPs3CGLz57kaquUwiEfwfsIgfEbUbE2JNkyu1uT6zWxMqm05snDrIbcZI5pGcgFos0nhmVycif1cP3S5tp-prl2UPqAPqEn6oBBQGLcTn4UP-4dL7fSiTjm1g> : FAILURE
> No problems were identified. If you know why this problem occurred,
> please add a suitable Cause for it. ( https://jenkins.fd.io/job/vpp-v<https://url10.mailanyone.net/v1/?m=1eJccQ-0000Nh-40&i=57e1b682&c=HPvq91kiezi7o40LB46GoU_VrbxtDBkQXU5NOJN_42q7wmrEnrwscRiZwyjmDXZOEmLd8JMBdpFe-7JiVzZkw4P2Ihs_YR6Sk9t1pjqzLuIudy-9VE0hgoBXW6H29wrv7L_K5Aqoyg78Nd5HU7OZO_asCpJAANWfs8j1RlQt4ZgVhZQ2MbpFnIS0JhjKATBUVrd-UJqu3fJ4NV72nr9EXIBKBo3TEwddeXt60-f6fY4>
> erify-master-opensuse/459/ )
> Logs: https://logs.fd.io/production/vex-yul-rot-jenkins-1/vpp-verify-<https://url10.mailanyone.net/v1/?m=1eJccQ-0000Nh-40&i=57e1b682&c=RTpZiGUHQDsP_NHKLHjL0vSodFxLttA5Axm0FF4Ba7Z_7XdX4q7ysiiijQ4SbYGfN4l8JkEWeWAQqcc6Embmgh6M0RYuRYKS56AaKXqb6hjUUMQMY55wxIWegV-oFHm4t1n9qPio_oM_07npfY6TAWw2UrFyU00Farp2o3CAJjNk4Lm-J4piiZkdu7FFCApKttRX190YxUS0tjKTz4c5TqKeV8umjOaEWX4jl9cshT_50M9ejJt2tEYt5eAglzbujgAy5y_LWjAa7ZqsJ-tOmQ>
> master-opensuse/459
> ----- %< ------
>
> From the logs, it appears that there is an issue related to building
> dpdk. Have you seen this issue before? If so, it this an
> infrastructure issue or something else?
>
> Thanks,
> -daw-
> _______________________________________________
> vpp-dev mailing list
> vpp-dev@lists.fd.io
> https://lists.fd.io/mailman/listinfo/vpp-dev<https://url10.mailanyone.net/v1/?m=1eJccQ-0000Nh-40&i=57e1b682&c=x-0-WzGI6FM6bK_0y0wK-wa_kz5kTgJK0gAroY5hLIlDHyVofzSdxoUykmXKBcnKoIPJ8AerStHA272WfvwPTEfWez9UcPBjc6kB8arPadIKKH6TYBe8HjzfX8Hy08QqX01wl9RPNsq5OEaPRD7mDUak3_J5vjy5oimChKo1j47p83Tcn1zZ5KXEcIDfanVjw0WrJHG7vBBSGaoVvQKPK70sQ2NhCdAwIaMRCPzaJq_P-I3imaTGYdXc7R0xTP8s>
_______________________________________________
vpp-dev mailing list
vpp-dev@lists.fd.io
https://lists.fd.io/mailman/listinfo/vpp-dev<https://url10.mailanyone.net/v1/?m=1eJccQ-0000Nh-40&i=57e1b682&c=x-0-WzGI6FM6bK_0y0wK-wa_kz5kTgJK0gAroY5hLIlDHyVofzSdxoUykmXKBcnKoIPJ8AerStHA272WfvwPTEfWez9UcPBjc6kB8arPadIKKH6TYBe8HjzfX8Hy08QqX01wl9RPNsq5OEaPRD7mDUak3_J5vjy5oimChKo1j47p83Tcn1zZ5KXEcIDfanVjw0WrJHG7vBBSGaoVvQKPK70sQ2NhCdAwIaMRCPzaJq_P-I3imaTGYdXc7R0xTP8s>
--
Marco V
SUSE LINUX GmbH | GF: Felix Imendörffer, Jane Smithard, Graham Norton
HRB 21284 (AG Nürnberg) Maxfeldstr. 5, D-90409, Nürnberg
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: [dpdk-users] [vpp-dev] vpp-verify-master-opensuse build failure triage
2017-11-28 10:34 ` [dpdk-users] [vpp-dev] vpp-verify-master-opensuse build failure triage Gabriel Ganne
@ 2017-11-28 11:31 ` Marco Varlese
2017-11-29 11:20 ` Thomas Monjalon
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Marco Varlese @ 2017-11-28 11:31 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Gabriel Ganne, Dave Wallace, Gonzalez Monroy, Sergio, users; +Cc: vpp-dev
Hi Gabriel,
I just submitted a patch (https://gerrit.fd.io/r/#/c/9597/) to VPP to fix thisissue.
I've added you to the review so you can take a look.
In order to verify that the new patch fixes the issue, people should first run:
$ rpm -e vpp-dpdk-devel && rm dpdk/dpdk-17.08.tar.xz
to trigger a rebuild and reinstall of the dpdk package...
Cheers,
Marco
On Tue, 2017-11-28 at 10:34 +0000, Gabriel Ganne wrote:
> Adding dpdk-user ML.
>
> I had a look with an older dpdk archive I found.
> The folder archived has been renamed from *dpdk-17.08* to *dpdk-stable-17.08*
> This is the only difference, but it is enough to make the md5sum fail.
>
> --
> Gabriel Ganne
> From: Gabriel Ganne
> Sent: Tuesday, November 28, 2017 11:13:23 AM
> To: Marco Varlese; Dave Wallace; Gonzalez Monroy, Sergio
> Cc: vpp-dev@lists.fd.io
> Subject: Re: [vpp-dev] vpp-verify-master-opensuse build failure triage
>
> Hi Marco,
>
> I believe http://fast.dpdk.org/rel redirects to http://static.dpdk.org/rel/
>
> I disagree on the md5 hashs.
> I have the following (NOK on 17.08, and OK on 17.11) :
>
> $ wget http://static.dpdk.org/rel/dpdk-17.08.tar.xz
> $ openssl md5 dpdk-17.08.tar.xz # is 0641f59ea8ea98afefa7cfa2699f6241 in
> dpdk/Makefile
> MD5(dpdk-17.08.tar.xz)= 537ff038915fefd0f210905fafcadb4b
>
> $ wget http://static.dpdk.org/rel/dpdk-17.11.tar.xz
> $ openssl md5 dpdk-17.11.tar.xz
> MD5(dpdk-17.11.tar.xz)= 53ee9e054a8797c9e67ffa0eb5d0c701
>
> Though I agree that if the "recheck" button made the build pass, there must be
> something wrong on my side.
> ... what did I miss ?
>
> --
> Gabriel Ganne
> From: Marco Varlese <mvarlese@suse.de>
> Sent: Tuesday, November 28, 2017 10:55:49 AM
> To: Gabriel Ganne; Dave Wallace; Gonzalez Monroy, Sergio
> Cc: vpp-dev@lists.fd.io
> Subject: Re: [vpp-dev] vpp-verify-master-opensuse build failure triage
>
> Hi Gabriel,
>
> On Tue, 2017-11-28 at 09:19 +0000, Gabriel Ganne wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I also have this issue on my machine, and I see on http://static.dpdk.org/re
> > l/ that dpdk-17.08.tar.xz was written yesterday (27-Nov-2017 13:00)
> > Wouldn't it be possible that the archive was overwritten ?
>
> The DPDK tarball in VPP is downloaded from http://fast.dpdk.org/rel
> According to http://dpdk.org/rel the MD5 used in VPP for the DPDK 17.08
> release is correct.
> > In which case, the hash would need to be updated.
>
> Right, if the tarball was a newer and different one then the MD5 hash should
> be updated in VPP for the the checksum performed...
> However, in the case described by Dave below, a simple 'recheck' which
> triggers a new build (with the same code/scripts/etc. hence the same MD5 hash)
> solved it.
>
> > Also, this would probably not be seen by people who had the dpdk-install-dev
> > package already installed.
> >
> > Who should I ask to check this ?
>
> I've added Sergio who might have further thoughts on this one.
>
> > Best regards
> >
> > --
> > Gabriel Ganne
> > From: vpp-dev-bounces@lists.fd.io <vpp-dev-bounces@lists.fd.io> on behalf of
> > Marco Varlese <mvarlese@suse.de>
> > Sent: Tuesday, November 28, 2017 9:19:37 AM
> > To: Dave Wallace
> > Cc: vpp-dev@lists.fd.io
> > Subject: Re: [vpp-dev] vpp-verify-master-opensuse build failure triage
> >
> > Dear Dave,
> >
> > By the look of it is seemed to have been an hiccup with the download or
> > that something spurious was left on the filesystem...
> > ===
> > 12:08:13 Bad Checksum! Please remove /w/workspace/vpp-verify-master-
> > opensuse/dpdk/dpdk-17.08.tar.xz and retry
> > 12:08:13 Makefile:267: recipe for target '/w/workspace/vpp-verify-
> > master-opensuse/build-root/build-vpp-native/dpdk/.download.ok' failed
> > 12:08:13 make[3]: *** [/w/workspace/vpp-verify-master-opensuse/build-
> > root/build-vpp-native/dpdk/.download.ok] Error 1
> > 12:08:13 make[3]: Leaving directory '/w/workspace/vpp-verify-master-
> > opensuse/dpdk'
> > 12:08:13 Makefile:460: recipe for target 'ebuild-build' failed
> > 12:08:13 make[2]: *** [ebuild-build] Error 2
> > 12:08:13 make[2]: Leaving directory '/w/workspace/vpp-verify-master-
> > opensuse/dpdk'
> > 12:08:13 Makefile:682: recipe for target 'dpdk-build' failed
> > 12:08:13 make[1]: *** [dpdk-build] Error 2
> > 12:08:13 make[1]: Leaving directory '/w/workspace/vpp-verify-master-
> > opensuse/build-root'
> > 12:08:13 Makefile:333: recipe for target 'build-release' failed
> > 12:08:13 make: *** [build-release] Error 2
> > 12:08:13 Build step 'Execute shell' marked build as failure
> > ===
> >
> > Since the MD5 checksum on the DPDK tarball fails; to answer your
> > question, no, it has never happened to me to see this specific issue
> > before.
> >
> > I don't think there's anything specific to the openSUSE setup and/or
> > scripts being executed. I'd rather feel is - as I said earlier -
> > something to do with an hiccup on the infrastructure side. The fact
> > that a 'recheck' made it passing I suppose it confirms my current
> > theory.
> >
> > An idea: maybe, if it happens again, we might want to ask Vanessa to
> > see what's the status on the slave-node? Not sure if that could give us
> > some more insight of what's going on.
> >
> >
> > Cheers,
> > Marco
> >
> > On Mon, 2017-11-27 at 11:04 -0500, Dave Wallace wrote:
> > > Marco,
> > >
> > > Can you please take a look at the build failure encountered with http
> > > s://gerrit.fd.io/r/#/c/9582/ on the vpp-verify-master-opensuse
> > > jenkins job:
> > >
> > > ----- %< -----
> > > fd.io JJB 7:56 AM
> > > Patch Set 2: Verified-1
> > > Build Failed
> > > https://jenkins.fd.io/job/vpp-verify-master-opensuse/459/ : FAILURE
> > > No problems were identified. If you know why this problem occurred,
> > > please add a suitable Cause for it. ( https://jenkins.fd.io/job/vpp-v
> > > erify-master-opensuse/459/ )
> > > Logs: https://logs.fd.io/production/vex-yul-rot-jenkins-1/vpp-verify-
> > > master-opensuse/459
> > > ----- %< ------
> > >
> > > From the logs, it appears that there is an issue related to building
> > > dpdk. Have you seen this issue before? If so, it this an
> > > infrastructure issue or something else?
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > > -daw-
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > vpp-dev mailing list
> > > vpp-dev@lists.fd.io
> > > https://lists.fd.io/mailman/listinfo/vpp-dev
> > _______________________________________________
> > vpp-dev mailing list
> > vpp-dev@lists.fd.io
> > https://lists.fd.io/mailman/listinfo/vpp-dev
>
> --
> Marco V
>
> SUSE LINUX GmbH | GF: Felix Imendörffer, Jane Smithard, Graham Norton
> HRB 21284 (AG Nürnberg) Maxfeldstr. 5, D-90409, Nürnberg
--
Marco V
SUSE LINUX GmbH | GF: Felix Imendörffer, Jane Smithard, Graham Norton
HRB 21284 (AG Nürnberg) Maxfeldstr. 5, D-90409, Nürnberg
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: [dpdk-users] [vpp-dev] vpp-verify-master-opensuse build failure triage
2017-11-28 11:31 ` Marco Varlese
@ 2017-11-29 11:20 ` Thomas Monjalon
0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Thomas Monjalon @ 2017-11-29 11:20 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Marco Varlese, Gabriel Ganne
Cc: users, Dave Wallace, Gonzalez Monroy, Sergio, vpp-dev, yliu
Hi,
It is an error on DPDK side.
It seems the tarball for DPDK 17.08 has been overwritten by the stable release process.
I have restored the original tarball and we are checking what went wrong.
fast.dpdk.org is a CDN for static.dpdk.org.
It may take time to get the restored tarball on all CDN nodes.
Sorry for the noise
28/11/2017 12:31, Marco Varlese:
> Hi Gabriel,
>
> I just submitted a patch (https://gerrit.fd.io/r/#/c/9597/) to VPP to fix thisissue.
> I've added you to the review so you can take a look.
>
> In order to verify that the new patch fixes the issue, people should first run:
>
> $ rpm -e vpp-dpdk-devel && rm dpdk/dpdk-17.08.tar.xz
>
> to trigger a rebuild and reinstall of the dpdk package...
>
>
> Cheers,
> Marco
>
> On Tue, 2017-11-28 at 10:34 +0000, Gabriel Ganne wrote:
> > Adding dpdk-user ML.
> >
> > I had a look with an older dpdk archive I found.
> > The folder archived has been renamed from *dpdk-17.08* to *dpdk-stable-17.08*
> > This is the only difference, but it is enough to make the md5sum fail.
> >
> > --
> > Gabriel Ganne
> > From: Gabriel Ganne
> > Sent: Tuesday, November 28, 2017 11:13:23 AM
> > To: Marco Varlese; Dave Wallace; Gonzalez Monroy, Sergio
> > Cc: vpp-dev@lists.fd.io
> > Subject: Re: [vpp-dev] vpp-verify-master-opensuse build failure triage
> >
> > Hi Marco,
> >
> > I believe http://fast.dpdk.org/rel redirects to http://static.dpdk.org/rel/
> >
> > I disagree on the md5 hashs.
> > I have the following (NOK on 17.08, and OK on 17.11) :
> >
> > $ wget http://static.dpdk.org/rel/dpdk-17.08.tar.xz
> > $ openssl md5 dpdk-17.08.tar.xz # is 0641f59ea8ea98afefa7cfa2699f6241 in
> > dpdk/Makefile
> > MD5(dpdk-17.08.tar.xz)= 537ff038915fefd0f210905fafcadb4b
> >
> > $ wget http://static.dpdk.org/rel/dpdk-17.11.tar.xz
> > $ openssl md5 dpdk-17.11.tar.xz
> > MD5(dpdk-17.11.tar.xz)= 53ee9e054a8797c9e67ffa0eb5d0c701
> >
> > Though I agree that if the "recheck" button made the build pass, there must be
> > something wrong on my side.
> > ... what did I miss ?
> >
> > --
> > Gabriel Ganne
> > From: Marco Varlese <mvarlese@suse.de>
> > Sent: Tuesday, November 28, 2017 10:55:49 AM
> > To: Gabriel Ganne; Dave Wallace; Gonzalez Monroy, Sergio
> > Cc: vpp-dev@lists.fd.io
> > Subject: Re: [vpp-dev] vpp-verify-master-opensuse build failure triage
> >
> > Hi Gabriel,
> >
> > On Tue, 2017-11-28 at 09:19 +0000, Gabriel Ganne wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > I also have this issue on my machine, and I see on http://static.dpdk.org/re
> > > l/ that dpdk-17.08.tar.xz was written yesterday (27-Nov-2017 13:00)
> > > Wouldn't it be possible that the archive was overwritten ?
> >
> > The DPDK tarball in VPP is downloaded from http://fast.dpdk.org/rel
> > According to http://dpdk.org/rel the MD5 used in VPP for the DPDK 17.08
> > release is correct.
> > > In which case, the hash would need to be updated.
> >
> > Right, if the tarball was a newer and different one then the MD5 hash should
> > be updated in VPP for the the checksum performed...
> > However, in the case described by Dave below, a simple 'recheck' which
> > triggers a new build (with the same code/scripts/etc. hence the same MD5 hash)
> > solved it.
> >
> > > Also, this would probably not be seen by people who had the dpdk-install-dev
> > > package already installed.
> > >
> > > Who should I ask to check this ?
> >
> > I've added Sergio who might have further thoughts on this one.
> >
> > > Best regards
> > >
> > > --
> > > Gabriel Ganne
> > > From: vpp-dev-bounces@lists.fd.io <vpp-dev-bounces@lists.fd.io> on behalf of
> > > Marco Varlese <mvarlese@suse.de>
> > > Sent: Tuesday, November 28, 2017 9:19:37 AM
> > > To: Dave Wallace
> > > Cc: vpp-dev@lists.fd.io
> > > Subject: Re: [vpp-dev] vpp-verify-master-opensuse build failure triage
> > >
> > > Dear Dave,
> > >
> > > By the look of it is seemed to have been an hiccup with the download or
> > > that something spurious was left on the filesystem...
> > > ===
> > > 12:08:13 Bad Checksum! Please remove /w/workspace/vpp-verify-master-
> > > opensuse/dpdk/dpdk-17.08.tar.xz and retry
> > > 12:08:13 Makefile:267: recipe for target '/w/workspace/vpp-verify-
> > > master-opensuse/build-root/build-vpp-native/dpdk/.download.ok' failed
> > > 12:08:13 make[3]: *** [/w/workspace/vpp-verify-master-opensuse/build-
> > > root/build-vpp-native/dpdk/.download.ok] Error 1
> > > 12:08:13 make[3]: Leaving directory '/w/workspace/vpp-verify-master-
> > > opensuse/dpdk'
> > > 12:08:13 Makefile:460: recipe for target 'ebuild-build' failed
> > > 12:08:13 make[2]: *** [ebuild-build] Error 2
> > > 12:08:13 make[2]: Leaving directory '/w/workspace/vpp-verify-master-
> > > opensuse/dpdk'
> > > 12:08:13 Makefile:682: recipe for target 'dpdk-build' failed
> > > 12:08:13 make[1]: *** [dpdk-build] Error 2
> > > 12:08:13 make[1]: Leaving directory '/w/workspace/vpp-verify-master-
> > > opensuse/build-root'
> > > 12:08:13 Makefile:333: recipe for target 'build-release' failed
> > > 12:08:13 make: *** [build-release] Error 2
> > > 12:08:13 Build step 'Execute shell' marked build as failure
> > > ===
> > >
> > > Since the MD5 checksum on the DPDK tarball fails; to answer your
> > > question, no, it has never happened to me to see this specific issue
> > > before.
> > >
> > > I don't think there's anything specific to the openSUSE setup and/or
> > > scripts being executed. I'd rather feel is - as I said earlier -
> > > something to do with an hiccup on the infrastructure side. The fact
> > > that a 'recheck' made it passing I suppose it confirms my current
> > > theory.
> > >
> > > An idea: maybe, if it happens again, we might want to ask Vanessa to
> > > see what's the status on the slave-node? Not sure if that could give us
> > > some more insight of what's going on.
> > >
> > >
> > > Cheers,
> > > Marco
> > >
> > > On Mon, 2017-11-27 at 11:04 -0500, Dave Wallace wrote:
> > > > Marco,
> > > >
> > > > Can you please take a look at the build failure encountered with http
> > > > s://gerrit.fd.io/r/#/c/9582/ on the vpp-verify-master-opensuse
> > > > jenkins job:
> > > >
> > > > ----- %< -----
> > > > fd.io JJB 7:56 AM
> > > > Patch Set 2: Verified-1
> > > > Build Failed
> > > > https://jenkins.fd.io/job/vpp-verify-master-opensuse/459/ : FAILURE
> > > > No problems were identified. If you know why this problem occurred,
> > > > please add a suitable Cause for it. ( https://jenkins.fd.io/job/vpp-v
> > > > erify-master-opensuse/459/ )
> > > > Logs: https://logs.fd.io/production/vex-yul-rot-jenkins-1/vpp-verify-
> > > > master-opensuse/459
> > > > ----- %< ------
> > > >
> > > > From the logs, it appears that there is an issue related to building
> > > > dpdk. Have you seen this issue before? If so, it this an
> > > > infrastructure issue or something else?
> > > >
> > > > Thanks,
> > > > -daw-
> > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > vpp-dev mailing list
> > > > vpp-dev@lists.fd.io
> > > > https://lists.fd.io/mailman/listinfo/vpp-dev
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > vpp-dev mailing list
> > > vpp-dev@lists.fd.io
> > > https://lists.fd.io/mailman/listinfo/vpp-dev
> >
> > Marco V
> >
> > SUSE LINUX GmbH | GF: Felix Imendörffer, Jane Smithard, Graham Norton
> > HRB 21284 (AG Nürnberg) Maxfeldstr. 5, D-90409, Nürnberg
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2017-11-29 11:20 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
[not found] <a7d857a8-1475-bf4c-b1e1-afef931ccc43@gmail.com>
[not found] ` <1511857177.2474.13.camel@suse.de>
[not found] ` <HE1PR0701MB257242CC3FB3662C8C106236813A0@HE1PR0701MB2572.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com>
[not found] ` <1511862949.2292.5.camel@suse.de>
[not found] ` <HE1PR0701MB2572F65064C5ED08388C8E0B813A0@HE1PR0701MB2572.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com>
2017-11-28 10:34 ` [dpdk-users] [vpp-dev] vpp-verify-master-opensuse build failure triage Gabriel Ganne
2017-11-28 11:31 ` Marco Varlese
2017-11-29 11:20 ` Thomas Monjalon
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).