From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from smtp-4.sys.kth.se (smtp-4.sys.kth.se [130.237.48.193]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C99E95F24 for ; Thu, 6 Dec 2018 18:28:04 +0100 (CET) Received: from smtp-4.sys.kth.se (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by smtp-4.sys.kth.se (Postfix) with ESMTP id 69EC62787; Thu, 6 Dec 2018 18:28:04 +0100 (CET) X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at kth.se Received: from smtp-4.sys.kth.se ([127.0.0.1]) by smtp-4.sys.kth.se (smtp-4.sys.kth.se [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id lt1dOj3UOkBL; Thu, 6 Dec 2018 18:28:03 +0100 (CET) Received: from exdb02.ug.kth.se (unknown [192.168.32.112]) by smtp-4.sys.kth.se (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 83310B9; Thu, 6 Dec 2018 18:27:59 +0100 (CET) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kth.se; s=default; t=1544117282; bh=Pd+YkkcY1R3hFhVxzGtFhyRHjSsDwtygnVUoF8hyK3E=; h=From:To:CC:Subject:Date:References:In-Reply-To; b=WWV/KDJhvRyBkL6Qbsz6hIdCUmbeQLfOZteb+FnxiqFqJv0e6A+G4e1zX7rSAbb5d p/3eZZiARu5UJXw47nm/Zs/fyRUIC/+vHfPJNk8VPg/brdQ/Y0c9KLf5dYKWD4xwPU iFpV2Kf/WIzlSbLyTlXxwcTmVsmfyNgPIR7GUmfo= Received: from exdb06.ug.kth.se (192.168.32.116) by exdb02.ug.kth.se (192.168.32.112) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1367.3; Thu, 6 Dec 2018 18:27:58 +0100 Received: from exdb05.ug.kth.se (192.168.32.115) by exdb06.ug.kth.se (192.168.32.116) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1367.3; Thu, 6 Dec 2018 18:27:58 +0100 Received: from exdb05.ug.kth.se ([192.168.32.115]) by exdb05.ug.kth.se ([192.168.32.115]) with mapi id 15.00.1367.000; Thu, 6 Dec 2018 18:27:58 +0100 From: Tom Barbette To: "Burakov, Anatoly" , Shahaf Shuler , Yongseok Koh , Raslan Darawsheh , Thomas Monjalon , "Iremonger, Bernard" CC: "users@dpdk.org" Thread-Topic: Unregistered mempool in secondary Thread-Index: AQHUjO2LmQco5PWHo0uingmMOU1mvKVxTSaggAAQ9qaAABImoIAAA8NagAAFlJCAAB/YhIAAIF8QgAAA6yCAAAT/QIAAEj+XgAAHsMCAAB3ltg== Date: Thu, 6 Dec 2018 17:27:58 +0000 Message-ID: <1544117277917.57532@kth.se> References: <1544053277210.30241@kth.se>, <1544084334026.77073@kth.se>, <1544089058614.30952@kth.se>, <1544097163543.88781@kth.se> , , <1544108032522.37391@kth.se> <1544110125447.14917@kth.se>, In-Reply-To: Accept-Language: fr-FR, sv-SE, en-US Content-Language: fr-FR X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted x-originating-ip: [83.249.19.162] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [dpdk-users] Unregistered mempool in secondary X-BeenThere: users@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK usage discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 06 Dec 2018 17:28:05 -0000 > except for the fact that you shouldn't run your secondary process with th= e same coremask as primary (it will lead to mempool cache corruption, among= other things).=0A= =0A= If I don't touch any packet on the primary, this shouldn't cause any proble= m, right? We want to use all of the CPU cores for processing. The primary i= s only a controller.=0A= =0A= Tom=