Hi Everyone, I have a Dell R720 Server and it has embedded NICs 5700 Broadcom family. I checked supported NiC for DPDK in http://doc.dpdk.org/guides/nics/bnxt.html and found out that support is for BCM5730X / BCM574XX / BCM58000 family of Ethernet Network Controllers. Can someone please suggest a NIC for DPDK purpose which can also be plugged into R720 Dell Server. Help is highly appreciated!  Best regards,Puneet On Wednesday, 20 February, 2019, 3:00:06 am GMT-8, wrote: Send users mailing list submissions to     users@dpdk.org To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit     https://mails.dpdk.org/listinfo/users or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to     users-request@dpdk.org You can reach the person managing the list at     users-owner@dpdk.org When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific than "Re: Contents of users digest..." Today's Topics:   1. Re: users Digest, Vol 173, Issue 6 (Liwu Liu) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Message: 1 Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2019 17:29:46 +0000 From: Liwu Liu To: "users@dpdk.org" Subject: Re: [dpdk-users] users Digest, Vol 173, Issue 6 Message-ID: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" I think you have to define certain flow rules into NIC to let it forward traffic to your DPDK user-land CQ. The hardware flow rule is used for the NIC to determine which packets to forward to DPDK rxq. No flow rule, receive no packet. -----Original Message----- From: users On Behalf Of users-request@dpdk.org Sent: Sunday, February 17, 2019 3:00 AM To: users@dpdk.org Subject: users Digest, Vol 173, Issue 6 Send users mailing list submissions to     users@dpdk.org To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit     https://mails.dpdk.org/listinfo/users or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to     users-request@dpdk.org You can reach the person managing the list at     users-owner@dpdk.org When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific than "Re: Contents of users digest..." Today's Topics:   1. flow rule rejected by device (Filip Janiszewski)   2. Re: flow rule rejected by device (Cliff Burdick)   3. Re: flow rule rejected by device (Filip Janiszewski) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Message: 1 Date: Sat, 16 Feb 2019 15:19:59 +0100 From: Filip Janiszewski To: "users@dpdk.org" Subject: [dpdk-users] flow rule rejected by device Message-ID:     Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-15 Hi All, I have a weird issue with an re-branded Mellanox card (sold as HP, but MLX hardware: HP InfiniBand FDR/EN 10/40Gb Dual Port 544FLR-QSFP Adapter) which is failing to start (rte_eth_dev_start) with the following message: . PMD: net_mlx4: 0xebbf40: cannot attach flow rules (code 95, "Operation not supported"), flow error type 2, cause 0x7f76cd22b680, message: flow rule rejected by device . I can't say what that cause means, any suggestion on how to decode those numbers? Also, I don't have configured any flow rule (or nothing related) and the very same code works fine one a ConnectX-4 Lx. I suspect a firmware compatibility issue, as the HP card is running with the FW version 2.30.3200 while apparently the Minimum firmware version required to support DPDK is 2.36.5000: http://www.mellanox.com/related-docs/prod_software/MLNX_DPDK_Quick_Start_Guide_v16.11_1.5.pdf (Page 8). The HP card is running on Mellanox firmware. Did anyone encountered a similar issue and can comment if the firmware can be the problem here? Thanks -- BR, Filip +48 666 369 823 ------------------------------ Message: 2 Date: Sat, 16 Feb 2019 20:32:57 -0800 From: Cliff Burdick To: Filip Janiszewski Cc: "users@dpdk.org" Subject: Re: [dpdk-users] flow rule rejected by device Message-ID:     Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" What type are flow are you creating? I believe #95 is simply that it's not supported on that NIC. I'm not sure if an HP variant of the CX4 will support different flows, but it should be traceable in the driver. On Sat, Feb 16, 2019 at 6:20 AM Filip Janiszewski < contact@filipjaniszewski.com> wrote: > Hi All, > > I have a weird issue with an re-branded Mellanox card (sold as HP, but > MLX hardware: HP InfiniBand FDR/EN 10/40Gb Dual Port 544FLR-QSFP > Adapter) which is failing to start (rte_eth_dev_start) with the > following message: > > . > PMD: net_mlx4: 0xebbf40: cannot attach flow rules (code 95, "Operation > not supported"), flow error type 2, cause 0x7f76cd22b680, message: flow > rule rejected by device > . > > I can't say what that cause means, any suggestion on how to decode those > numbers? Also, I don't have configured any flow rule (or nothing > related) and the very same code works fine one a ConnectX-4 Lx. > > I suspect a firmware compatibility issue, as the HP card is running with > the FW version 2.30.3200 while apparently the Minimum firmware version > required to support DPDK is 2.36.5000: > > > http://www.mellanox.com/related-docs/prod_software/MLNX_DPDK_Quick_Start_Guide_v16.11_1.5.pdf > > (Page 8). > > The HP card is running on Mellanox firmware. > > Did anyone encountered a similar issue and can comment if the firmware > can be the problem here? > > Thanks > > -- > BR, Filip > +48 666 369 823 > ------------------------------ Message: 3 Date: Sun, 17 Feb 2019 08:40:20 +0100 From: Filip Janiszewski To: Cliff Burdick Cc: "users@dpdk.org" Subject: Re: [dpdk-users] flow rule rejected by device Message-ID:     <0d068419-3931-34ec-493d-c4cd1a2b99b1@filipjaniszewski.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 I'm not creating any flow at all, that's the weird part. Il 17/02/19 05:32, Cliff Burdick ha scritto: > What type are flow are you creating? I believe #95 is simply that it's > not supported on that NIC. I'm not sure if an HP variant of the CX4 will > support different flows, but it should be traceable in the driver. > > On Sat, Feb 16, 2019 at 6:20 AM Filip Janiszewski > > wrote: > >    Hi All, > >    I have a weird issue with an re-branded Mellanox card (sold as HP, but >    MLX hardware: HP InfiniBand FDR/EN 10/40Gb Dual Port 544FLR-QSFP >    Adapter) which is failing to start (rte_eth_dev_start) with the >    following message: > >    . >    PMD: net_mlx4: 0xebbf40: cannot attach flow rules (code 95, "Operation >    not supported"), flow error type 2, cause 0x7f76cd22b680, message: flow >    rule rejected by device >    . > >    I can't say what that cause means, any suggestion on how to decode those >    numbers? Also, I don't have configured any flow rule (or nothing >    related) and the very same code works fine one a ConnectX-4 Lx. > >    I suspect a firmware compatibility issue, as the HP card is running with >    the FW version 2.30.3200 while apparently the Minimum firmware version >    required to support DPDK is 2.36.5000: > >    http://www.mellanox.com/related-docs/prod_software/MLNX_DPDK_Quick_Start_Guide_v16.11_1.5.pdf > >    (Page 8). > >    The HP card is running on Mellanox firmware. > >    Did anyone encountered a similar issue and can comment if the firmware >    can be the problem here? > >    Thanks > >    -- >    BR, Filip >    +48 666 369 823 > -- BR, Filip +48 666 369 823 End of users Digest, Vol 173, Issue 6 ************************************* ***  Please note that this message and any attachments may contain confidential and proprietary material and information and are intended only for the use of the intended recipient(s). If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any review, use, disclosure, dissemination, distribution or copying of this message and any attachments is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please immediately notify the sender and destroy this e-mail and any attachments and all copies, whether electronic or printed. Please also note that any views, opinions, conclusions or commitments expressed in this message are those of the individual sender and do not necessarily reflect the views of Fortinet, Inc., its affiliates, and emails are not binding on Fortinet and only a writing manually signed by Fortinet's General Counsel can be a binding commitment of Fortinet to Fortinet's customers or partners. Thank you. *** End of users Digest, Vol 174, Issue 1 ************************************* From changchun.zhang@oracle.com Tue Feb 26 00:57:48 2019 Return-Path: Received: from userp2120.oracle.com (userp2120.oracle.com [156.151.31.85]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E29D927D for ; Tue, 26 Feb 2019 00:57:47 +0100 (CET) Received: from pps.filterd (userp2120.oracle.com [127.0.0.1]) by userp2120.oracle.com (8.16.0.27/8.16.0.27) with SMTP id x1PNtBWl043901 for ; Mon, 25 Feb 2019 23:57:46 GMT DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=oracle.com; h=mime-version : message-id : date : from : sender : to : subject : content-type; s=corp-2018-07-02; bh=U0odlJUhqtJ1mTQipj1ECXQkPZQhm0YN+DqFNoJzMiw=; b=Vkf+VFL6eG1TPFxovu8xXHCR2fqxBTKGIcMw3hFs8XenSM1a0bFPlSeHrWCkgzdSWDSW cG1pO760usVPbUYcvYaH9fJAg8QSwV2etZM6g3JZ8jYHfOVVp2tUeHywBLhCSc5mSDe3 sBeHwr/tTUPkS7hYN0Y9GHNmvEQYUhRvmgZhRo14sJ2k9a6dUWZd7RH0/RtBtydTASkX bHEIGHwvHtXEd3NE79qfYdiDkj/TmetFMXlr6MREcUtmqNuytkCt73QKdJk3mhdsS1DS Yk+hQ6J6Q/I5ErlPXBNyasEHVrrsF0Ry20C+XYLl1vbwsirYb1nJAcQ/6EmgjoKUX+im RQ=Received: from userv0022.oracle.com (userv0022.oracle.com [156.151.31.74]) by userp2120.oracle.com with ESMTP id 2qtxtrhf8p-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipherìDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits%6 verify=OK) for ; Mon, 25 Feb 2019 23:57:46 +0000 Received: from aserv0121.oracle.com (aserv0121.oracle.com [141.146.126.235]) by userv0022.oracle.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id x1PNvebQ023462 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits%6 verify=OK) for ; Mon, 25 Feb 2019 23:57:41 GMT Received: from abhmp0011.oracle.com (abhmp0011.oracle.com [141.146.116.17]) by aserv0121.oracle.com (8.14.4/8.13.8) with ESMTP id x1PNve47024747 for ; Mon, 25 Feb 2019 23:57:40 GMT MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-ID: Date: Mon, 25 Feb 2019 15:57:37 -0800 (PST) From: Changchun Zhang Sender: Changchun Zhang To: users@dpdk.org X-Priority: 3 X-Mailer: Oracle Beehive Extensions for Outlook 2.0.1.9.1 (1003210) [OL 15.0.5111.0 (x86)] X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=nai engineY00 definitions‘78 signaturesf8685 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policyÞfault score=0 priorityscore01 malwarescore=0 suspectscore=1 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 spamscore=0 clxscore11 lowpriorityscore=0 mlxscore=0 impostorscore=0 mlxlogscoreA9 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.0.1-1810050000 definitions=main-1902250165 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.15 Subject: [dpdk-users] Guide on DPDK test command X-BeenThere: users@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK usage discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 25 Feb 2019 23:57:48 -0000 Hi Gurus, It is seen that the dpdk provides unit test tool for many dpdk functionality, in the folder test/, like test_crytodev.c. These files contain the callback functions and the data structures for test command. Does any guy know how to use these test functions and is there any guides? Thanks