From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from dpdk.org (dpdk.org [92.243.14.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DF183A057C for ; Thu, 26 Mar 2020 22:11:14 +0100 (CET) Received: from [92.243.14.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3919F1C028; Thu, 26 Mar 2020 22:11:14 +0100 (CET) Received: from out3-smtp.messagingengine.com (out3-smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.27]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0E6551B75C for ; Thu, 26 Mar 2020 22:11:13 +0100 (CET) Received: from compute7.internal (compute7.nyi.internal [10.202.2.47]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3B1E95C02ED; Thu, 26 Mar 2020 17:11:12 -0400 (EDT) Received: from mailfrontend1 ([10.202.2.162]) by compute7.internal (MEProxy); Thu, 26 Mar 2020 17:11:12 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=monjalon.net; h= from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:content-transfer-encoding:content-type; s=mesmtp; bh=SB/uNJXZ17dPt5/SjmUqGWg9swUL6b7X4umgatbWsc0=; b=ZboAB2xONG7m ntcDUmT6mjauqvNJ5oVIpsKCl9XzM/lOjQhfC29Q5F3nD4GLqDksNxDiSaOgMBcj p5KVE5C4r4Tw4TkbUFWQWsyY9X1Yef2VGIvbTEh9ba1FdJ2Eub2YNF9OOTpBKBOD 8kEOQd88uRhOnK8aOegBuAO/7p74a1I= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type :date:from:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references :subject:to:x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender :x-sasl-enc; s=fm2; bh=SB/uNJXZ17dPt5/SjmUqGWg9swUL6b7X4umgatbWs c0=; b=L0b34seUQrn0m6XdTqzOB0Zirmq1KL9UlYA31H8IivLi5b0S0XBfsnJiA 24t051ganJkrnPL9CW6oP0Q7Q/3QSA5ML/cO0OIB3Y0HIJQnTPnC2FzRmQMS0Jf3 1yihsJcAChQCQU/wTaS/0FiE+MSAxE8bC0di2x7W7Bcb4ZQEIc81I1VYu9Wel+gp 1pWIwGLRPOlISLcwGc+kJrqmu3MWU8i8v5M9ADaBh0xxrD2FRssg3OKg5XM/Z43O bUJ+PvmRqlYPxBZp58Rx8RTIDcyXSruqY8HF/PaV2mYpLXdLM6I7Plh2LrVSvNoj PSGHSEBR4vKYRDNaHE19qJn+PUIUA== X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedugedrudehjedgkeduucetufdoteggodetrfdotf fvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuhfgrshhtofgrihhlpdfqfgfvpdfurfetoffkrfgpnffqhgen uceurghilhhouhhtmecufedttdenucesvcftvggtihhpihgvnhhtshculddquddttddmne cujfgurhephffvufffkfgjfhgggfgtsehtufertddttddvnecuhfhrohhmpefvhhhomhgr shcuofhonhhjrghlohhnuceothhhohhmrghssehmohhnjhgrlhhonhdrnhgvtheqnecukf hppeejjedrudefgedrvddtfedrudekgeenucevlhhushhtvghrufhiiigvpedtnecurfgr rhgrmhepmhgrihhlfhhrohhmpehthhhomhgrshesmhhonhhjrghlohhnrdhnvght X-ME-Proxy: Received: from xps.localnet (184.203.134.77.rev.sfr.net [77.134.203.184]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 1BE303280064; Thu, 26 Mar 2020 17:11:11 -0400 (EDT) From: Thomas Monjalon To: Liwu Liu Cc: "users@dpdk.org" , erezf@mellanox.com, kiranv@mellanox.com, rasland@mellanox.com, asafp@mellanox.com Date: Thu, 26 Mar 2020 22:11:10 +0100 Message-ID: <1753687.1xdlsreqCQ@xps> In-Reply-To: <8e9c1a6b5c3148ecbaba453652bce127@fortinet.com> References: <8e9c1a6b5c3148ecbaba453652bce127@fortinet.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Subject: Re: [dpdk-users] mlx5 PMD fails to receive certain icmpv6 multicast X-BeenThere: users@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK usage discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: users-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "users" 06/03/2020 01:45, Liwu Liu: > Hi Team, > > I am using the mlx5/100G in KVM guest. The host shows this PCI vfNIC is provisioned to the guest: > "17:01.1 Ethernet controller: Mellanox Technologies MT27800 Family [ConnectX-5 Virtual Function]" > > I am using DPDK 19.11 with kind of standard configurations, and when DPDK application runs I still have the kernel mlx5e net device present. I have both promiscuous and all-multicast turned on. > > It works fine for IPV4, but for IPV6 it fails. It can receive packets destined to 33:33:00:00:00:02 (IPV6 Router solicitation), but cannot receive packets destined to 33:33:ff:00:00:01 (IPV6 neighbor solicitation for some address). > > But if I avoid DPDK, directly use the OFED-4.6 based kernel driver, everything works fine as expected. > > I am thinking there is some mismatch happened for MLX5 PMD. Please give some advice/hints. Adding Mellanox engineers in Cc list for help.