DPDK usage discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "forsakening@sina.cn" <forsakening@sina.cn>
To: users <users@dpdk.org>
Subject: [dpdk-users] Is anybody test rte_mbuf_free performance?
Date: Mon, 22 Aug 2016 20:37:25 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <201608222037241031642@sina.cn> (raw)

Hi Everyone:
I found  rte_pktmbuf_free not performe so well when using greater than 12 parallel caller。
Is anyone meet the same problem ?Thanks for giving a direction.



forsakening@sina.cn

             reply	other threads:[~2016-08-22 12:37 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-08-22 12:37 forsakening [this message]
2016-08-22 17:40 ` Andriy Berestovskyy

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=201608222037241031642@sina.cn \
    --to=forsakening@sina.cn \
    --cc=users@dpdk.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).