From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <users-bounces@dpdk.org>
Received: from mga06.intel.com (mga06.intel.com [134.134.136.31])
 by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 56ECE9364
 for <users@dpdk.org>; Thu,  8 Sep 2016 10:04:10 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from fmsmga001.fm.intel.com ([10.253.24.23])
 by orsmga104.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 08 Sep 2016 01:04:09 -0700
X-ExtLoop1: 1
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.30,298,1470726000"; d="scan'208";a="1036945428"
Received: from orsmsx110.amr.corp.intel.com ([10.22.240.8])
 by fmsmga001.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 08 Sep 2016 01:04:09 -0700
Received: from rrsmsp801.amr.corp.intel.com (10.9.230.203) by
 ORSMSX110.amr.corp.intel.com (10.22.240.8) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS)
 id 14.3.248.2; Thu, 8 Sep 2016 01:04:08 -0700
Received: from Pickup by RRSMSP801.amr.corp.intel.com with Microsoft SMTP
 Server id 14.3.301.0; Wed, 7 Sep 2016 22:17:09 +0000
From: Thomas Monjalon <thomas.monjalon@6wind.com>
Sender: users <users-bounces@dpdk.org>
To: Gao Ya'nan <abutter.gao@gmail.com>
CC: <users@dpdk.org>
References: <CAOTokwfa3vDPymUpQjnQYSxgfOXRYcn=LZqrF4sD2eVohaSGrA@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAOTokwfa3vDPymUpQjnQYSxgfOXRYcn=LZqrF4sD2eVohaSGrA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 5 Sep 2016 01:57:54 -0600
Message-ID: <1847119.8aDmHCeqkf@xps13>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 16.0
Thread-Index: AQGG2XqQYIxOahnZYUYhShZeLMjwZgK2OXXp
Subject: Re: [dpdk-users] Does DPDK support big endian system?
X-BeenThere: users@dpdk.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: usage discussions <users.dpdk.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/options/users>,
 <mailto:users-request@dpdk.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/users/>
List-Post: <mailto:users@dpdk.org>
List-Help: <mailto:users-request@dpdk.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/listinfo/users>,
 <mailto:users-request@dpdk.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 08 Sep 2016 08:04:10 -0000
Message-ID: <20160905075754.wvkN_AfdcECQq32M2pTNNlqFdHgZeBsT2AF_VZK6afk@z>

2016-09-05 11:49, Gao Ya'nan:
> Hi all,
> 
> I am trying porting librte_acl to a platform with Cavium MIPS64 processor.
> I tried the a set of rules and a trace file on x86 Linux first and then run
> testacl on this platform with same rules and trace file, but didn't see any
> right result.
> 
> Any suggestion would be appreciate.

Some DPDK areas try to manage endianness right but it's not tested and
I would not be surprised that ACL would need some fixes for big endian.