From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-pf0-f179.google.com (mail-pf0-f179.google.com [209.85.192.179]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 26E93FFA for ; Tue, 31 Jan 2017 00:20:54 +0100 (CET) Received: by mail-pf0-f179.google.com with SMTP id f144so94915952pfa.2 for ; Mon, 30 Jan 2017 15:20:54 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=networkplumber-org.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=JUnYAaQWc5Do29EMXtlnA1+3d4UPjQtWLSu0glmmijU=; b=Of6dMoFD80sFYHWlDcb3LSG2nZj2cat5rmDFFuEdEebgymLMTxCz0ZllddFnwSa+qB 7EiqLD48R3Vx4BaaSoesJgSOiOVWQW5ikRtCzk8NU7GUjdPOxchBY4ObArEclKQoVk8C X1BbPP06NhUq5NOYNdRwC1e4DQgIgT10h/AigF472ZPxDdZRsg8JNVN1wxf3evSDxs/z HF3+jrxoxuAz+cu5dMuwowaxztJZxIzccFViVcORlnwLxRlSdXQdjh3WmyvQzFPT+dPt 6BsscL+T6OikXbbK129fEjyGab71mWlhk6gsi8hIqy6ZSBKfjSCftUxpSGgX94OytGmz XYqg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:in-reply-to :references:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=JUnYAaQWc5Do29EMXtlnA1+3d4UPjQtWLSu0glmmijU=; b=pAQsv2clbAyQU61nYIVOPqssUSWeF34u76Q+k5lU1N/IFEnj/++kIJ4Wr+TE60Xvx+ ro95A3Eo5jpP/+D/yT/D/I+rZBZbm8SLC/0UAo6akfPuLMfAdmlm8E+grc88B5bQgiPD M9bdGhEUjf/vl+RS7EAwhnjN6nBK7oaYjQJp1W0vNMFiK9SznwRyFdYzR2aeP5pbkTPb FdcC9rtraxcxLLSc7IiPxfm1p5pY6z5A6lLVJcv0acoc20qZqsSeA6B94NrvEFE8NKkz NaQKZ1bevx5VeiQu8RxdEO8i4iciRhqUedyJaLV2CE6MotnX2JBFq6nqa+VSOcBu4xZg FYiw== X-Gm-Message-State: AIkVDXKPOlf596EgZZHVmAfWZ32QvjAUHxmTU91UkBXPyyUJFdTBnDm/Fn7VyM8CcyB1Bg== X-Received: by 10.99.181.7 with SMTP id y7mr26378174pge.57.1485818453281; Mon, 30 Jan 2017 15:20:53 -0800 (PST) Received: from xeon-e3 (204-195-18-65.wavecable.com. [204.195.18.65]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id u29sm35246093pfl.17.2017.01.30.15.20.52 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-CHACHA20-POLY1305 bits=256/256); Mon, 30 Jan 2017 15:20:53 -0800 (PST) Date: Mon, 30 Jan 2017 15:20:46 -0800 From: Stephen Hemminger To: Matthew Hall Cc: Primus Mutasingwa , users@dpdk.org Message-ID: <20170130152046.3a47169f@xeon-e3> In-Reply-To: <20170130230909.GA2194@mhcomputing.net> References: <20170130230909.GA2194@mhcomputing.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [dpdk-users] DPDK beginer: Best way to try out DPDK on a laptop with unsupported NIC X-BeenThere: users@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK usage discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 30 Jan 2017 23:20:54 -0000 On Mon, 30 Jan 2017 15:09:09 -0800 Matthew Hall wrote: > On Sun, Jan 29, 2017 at 08:08:35PM -0600, Primus Mutasingwa wrote: > > I am new to DPDK. I want to try out on a laptop with an unsupported NIC. > > (linux ubuntu 16.04) > > VMWare or VirtualBox VM w/ Intel E1000 emulation. > E1000 emulation is often problematic for DPDK. VMWare's emulation of PCI bus does not handle interrupts correctly. Use virtual NIC's (vmxnet3 and virtio) if at all possible.