From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail.mhcomputing.net (master.mhcomputing.net [74.208.228.170]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D75C52BAE for ; Tue, 31 Jan 2017 03:42:50 +0100 (CET) Received: by mail.mhcomputing.net (Postfix, from userid 1000) id E113E9B4; Mon, 30 Jan 2017 18:42:49 -0800 (PST) Date: Mon, 30 Jan 2017 18:42:49 -0800 From: Matthew Hall To: Stephen Hemminger Cc: Primus Mutasingwa , users@dpdk.org Message-ID: <20170131024249.GA5154@mhcomputing.net> References: <20170130230909.GA2194@mhcomputing.net> <20170130152046.3a47169f@xeon-e3> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20170130152046.3a47169f@xeon-e3> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.24 (2015-08-30) Subject: Re: [dpdk-users] DPDK beginer: Best way to try out DPDK on a laptop with unsupported NIC X-BeenThere: users@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK usage discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 31 Jan 2017 02:42:51 -0000 On Mon, Jan 30, 2017 at 03:20:46PM -0800, Stephen Hemminger wrote: > E1000 emulation is often problematic for DPDK. VMWare's emulation of PCI bus > does not handle interrupts correctly. > > Use virtual NIC's (vmxnet3 and virtio) if at all possible. vmxnet3 and virtio-net support in DPDK are both broken in VirtualBox. I usually use VirtualBox instead of VMWare because it doesn't require license fees. Since none of this is covered in the documentation or on the roadmap to get fixed in the DPDK virtio-net PMD, it would be difficult for us users to know about it. But thanks for pointing it out. Matthew.