From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <stephen@networkplumber.org>
Received: from mail-pg0-f41.google.com (mail-pg0-f41.google.com [74.125.83.41])
 by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E4D445699
 for <users@dpdk.org>; Sun,  6 Aug 2017 22:56:09 +0200 (CEST)
Received: by mail-pg0-f41.google.com with SMTP id v189so26263503pgd.2
 for <users@dpdk.org>; Sun, 06 Aug 2017 13:56:09 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
 d=networkplumber-org.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623;
 h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:in-reply-to:references
 :mime-version:content-transfer-encoding;
 bh=gDpYFYm8UqrE/S8fCZ09+K1pfL/IzLDTfu1rllRY51k=;
 b=muvmCanVJDXU7K7btiixlHC5dxeCVgxvKuZqnC89uvMRSJrWkWL2stttFY8K7fS3Fp
 GbixWosHIKGlvQKYC5vnAn3eu+azt9a0urvOEjn0Edci7bfpHAIsfJy1asnDTMlgVmmS
 cpZ48ua0w7OfwVCl7QfGcp3a8j2MDl/qGA6UWZ+0Fzo35Hc9z6jbe4JfzMTvTGFzJUSg
 EZ3QjDaDaZblxZNz3bLaSAfmzfqRwkkt3gZWidNNz+oe/Aa2XW2IyjRE/NAnH7wDt/rg
 fzpPjPJ/oR7uXoHCYUfUkA2Vcndk2Ekxhoeht1a3E+psvzYjKbELiIXGaZfT7Q0+PYFo
 eUQA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
 d=1e100.net; s=20161025;
 h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:in-reply-to
 :references:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding;
 bh=gDpYFYm8UqrE/S8fCZ09+K1pfL/IzLDTfu1rllRY51k=;
 b=A6dWqJKnihZLKI467Y+p3aDiHe4rRyzqpP+a5Z9Stp1fDmJ3lw+RgeBbrTP/CuElTU
 XXqO6KdPbMs+OTtyh88QQyCGaqYxzw5RRk9gdXEc+aTyDgYUwjXXua4ULwfVmUZuoTDP
 CIbcDlZDD0OewPEA4DOvDvgjl6aninVzQwcPlzVBNwhOeAjAtKn07tZc7j1EPqog92d5
 xsmwx34vBEBzGwZDIyEeeQBqMRBRmdJtHDzYb+by9WC9+oBDYPsLkTjYghkS0UPHMldo
 OaqUGgOlSy5KuIZ1zTN3zEEHUm2ClskIdl2/9Wg801SsQIOBvQ8TLE6ntRjBsMRtsX6n
 l2hg==
X-Gm-Message-State: AIVw110p/tnP86hAuFkW8h0iWLXsrtwKerKjY6YM3jf+YVfJRwvHA3rO
 gcSSdLvSfHXxYDiZ
X-Received: by 10.84.168.131 with SMTP id f3mr11326364plb.220.1502052969187;
 Sun, 06 Aug 2017 13:56:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from xeon-e3 (76-14-207-240.or.wavecable.com. [76.14.207.240])
 by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id j65sm13089877pgc.36.2017.08.06.13.56.08
 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-CHACHA20-POLY1305 bits=256/256);
 Sun, 06 Aug 2017 13:56:09 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Sun, 6 Aug 2017 13:56:07 -0700
From: Stephen Hemminger <stephen@networkplumber.org>
To: Kevin Wilson <wkevils@gmail.com>
Cc: users@dpdk.org
Message-ID: <20170806135607.1de07783@xeon-e3>
In-Reply-To: <CAGXs5wWpb8HS6Yin2VBuBBQtDF+xs4k9H6iLxyJxo-d7gkc5Sg@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAGXs5wWpb8HS6Yin2VBuBBQtDF+xs4k9H6iLxyJxo-d7gkc5Sg@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [dpdk-users] Hugepage size on x86 architectures:
X-BeenThere: users@dpdk.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: DPDK usage discussions <users.dpdk.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/options/users>,
 <mailto:users-request@dpdk.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/users/>
List-Post: <mailto:users@dpdk.org>
List-Help: <mailto:users-request@dpdk.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/listinfo/users>,
 <mailto:users-request@dpdk.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 06 Aug 2017 20:56:10 -0000

On Sun, 6 Aug 2017 13:31:48 +0300
Kevin Wilson <wkevils@gmail.com> wrote:

> Is it possible to use in DPDK other hugepage size than 2MB and 1GB (in
> order to benchmark performance)
> on x86 architectures)?

I think this is a CPU hardware restriction.