[dpdk-users] 答复: RE: Re: Issue with Pktgen and OVS-DPDK

[<wang.yong19@zte.com.cn>]

This patch works in our VMs. 
We really appreciate for your help!


------------------origin------------------
发件人： <junjie.j.chen@intel.com>;
收件人：秦春华10013690;
抄送人： <xuekun.hu@intel.com>;汪勇10032886; <keith.wiles@intel.com>; <Gabriel.Ionescu@enea.com>; <jianfeng.tan@intel.com>; <users@dpdk.org>;
日 期 ：2018年01月11日 17:35
主 题 ：RE: Re: [dpdk-users] Issue with Pktgen and OVS-DPDK
Could please try this patch for app/pktgen.c

@@ -877,6 +877,7 @@ pktgen_setup_cb(struct rte_mempool *mp,
{
pkt_data_t *data = (pkt_data_t *)opaque;
struct rte_mbuf *m = (struct rte_mbuf *)obj;
+       pktmbuf_reset(m);
port_info_t *info;
pkt_seq_t *pkt;
uint16_t qid;


it works on my setup.

Cheers
JJ


> -----Original Message-----
> From: qin.chunhua@zte.com.cn [mailto:qin.chunhua@zte.com.cn]
> Sent: Wednesday, January 10, 2018 7:45 PM
> To: Chen, Junjie J <junjie.j.chen@intel.com>
> Cc: Hu, Xuekun <xuekun.hu@intel.com>; wang.yong19@zte.com.cn; Wiles,
> Keith <keith.wiles@intel.com>; Gabriel.Ionescu@enea.com; Tan, Jianfeng
> <jianfeng.tan@intel.com>; users@dpdk.org
> Subject: 答复: Re: [dpdk-users] Issue with Pktgen and OVS-DPDK
>
> Hi,
> Thanks a lot for your advice.
> We used pktgen-3.0.10 + dpdk-17.02.1 + virtio1.0 applied the two patches
> below, the problem was resolved.
> Now we met a new problem in the above situation. We set mac of the virtio
> port before we start generating flow.
> At first, everything is OK. Then, we stop the flow and restart the same flow
> without any other modifications.
> We found the source mac of the flow was different from what we had set to
> the virtio port.
> Moreover, the source mac was different every time we restart the flow.
> What's going on? Do you know any patches to fix this problem if we can't
> change the version of virtio?
> Looking forward to receiving your reply. Thank you!
>
>
>
> ------------------原始邮件------------------
> 发件人： <junjie.j.chen@intel.com>;
> 收件人： <xuekun.hu@intel.com>;汪勇10032886; <keith.wiles@intel.com>;
> 抄送人： <Gabriel.Ionescu@enea.com>; <jianfeng.tan@intel.com>;
> <users@dpdk.org>;
> 日 期 ：2018年01月10日 09:47
> 主 题 ：Re: [dpdk-users] Issue with Pktgen and OVS-DPDK Start from qemu
> 2.7, virtio default use 1.0 instead of 0.9, which add a flag
> (VIRTIO_F_VERSION_1) to device feature.
>
> Actually, qemu use disable-legacy=on,disable-modern=off to support virtio
> 1.0. an use disable-legacy=off,disable-modern=on to support virtio 0.9. So
> you can use virtio 0.9 on qemu 2.7+ to workaround this.
>
> Cheers
> JJ
>
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Hu, Xuekun
> > Sent: Wednesday, January 10, 2018 9:32 AM
> > To: wang.yong19@zte.com.cn; Wiles, Keith <keith.wiles@intel.com>
> > Cc: Chen, Junjie J <junjie.j.chen@intel.com>;
> > Gabriel.Ionescu@enea.com; Tan, Jianfeng <jianfeng.tan@intel.com>;
> > users@dpdk.org
> > Subject: RE: Re: [dpdk-users] Issue with Pktgen and OVS-DPDK
> >
> > Maybe the new qemu (starting from 2.8) introduced some new features
> > that break the pktgen and dpdk compatibility?
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: wang.yong19@zte.com.cn [mailto:wang.yong19@zte.com.cn]
> > Sent: Tuesday, January 09, 2018 10:30 PM
> > To: Wiles, Keith <keith.wiles@intel.com>
> > Cc: Chen, Junjie J <junjie.j.chen@intel.com>; Hu, Xuekun
> > <xuekun.hu@intel.com>; Gabriel.Ionescu@enea.com; Tan, Jianfeng
> > <jianfeng.tan@intel.com>; users@dpdk.org
> > Subject: 答复: Re: [dpdk-users] Issue with Pktgen and OVS-DPDK
> >
> > Hi,
> > We use pktgen-3.0.10 + dpdk-17.02.1 applied the two patches below, the
> > problem is resolved.
> > But when we use pktgen-3.4.6 + dpdk-17.11(the two patches below are
> > included), the problem remains.
> > It seems that there are still something wrong with pktgen-3.4.6 and
> > dpdk-17.11.
> >
> >
> > ------------------origin------------------
> > 发件人： <keith.wiles@intel.com>;
> > 收件人： <junjie.j.chen@intel.com>;
> > 抄送人： <xuekun.hu@intel.com>; <Gabriel.Ionescu@enea.com>;
> > <jianfeng.tan@intel.com>; <users@dpdk.org>;
> > 日 期 ：2018年01月09日 22:04
> > 主 题 ：Re: [dpdk-users] Issue with Pktgen and OVS-DPDK
> >
> >
> > > On Jan 9, 2018, at 7:00 AM, Chen, Junjie J <junjie.j.chen@intel.com>
> wrote:
> > >
> > > Hi
> > > There are two defects may cause this issue:
> > >
> > > 1) in pktgen, see this patch [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] pktgen-dpdk: fix low
> > > performance in VM virtio pmd mode diff --git a/lib/common/mbuf.h
> > > b/lib/common/mbuf.h index 759f95d..93065f6 100644 —
> > > a/lib/common/mbuf.h
> > > +++ b/lib/common/mbuf.h
> > > @@ -18,6 +18,7 @@ pktmbuf_reset(struct rte_mbuf *m)
> > > m->nb_segs = 1;
> > > m->port = 0xff;
> > >
> > > +    m->data_len = m->pkt_len;
> > > m->data_off = (RTE_PKTMBUF_HEADROOM <= m->buf_len) ?
> > > RTE_PKTMBUF_HEADROOM : m->buf_len;
> > > }
> >
> > This patch is in Pktgen 3.4.6
> > >
> > > 2) in virtio_rxtx.c, please see commit f1216c1eca5a5. net/virtio:
> > > fix Tx packet length stats
> > >
> > > You could patch both these two patch to try it.
> > >
> > > Cheers
> > > JJ
> > >
> > >
> > >> -----Original Message-----
> > >> From: users [mailto:users-bounces@dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Hu, Xuekun
> > >> Sent: Tuesday, January 9, 2018 2:38 PM
> > >> To: Wiles, Keith <keith.wiles@intel.com>; Gabriel Ionescu
> > >> <Gabriel.Ionescu@enea.com>; Tan, Jianfeng <jianfeng.tan@intel.com>
> > >> Cc: users@dpdk.org
> > >> Subject: Re: [dpdk-users] Issue with Pktgen and OVS-DPDK
> > >>
> > >> Hi, Keith
> > >>
> > >> Any updates on this issue? We met similar behavior that ovs-dpdk
> > >> reports they receive packet with size increment 12 bytes until more
> > >> than 1518, then pktgen stops sending packets, while we only ask
> > >> pktgen to generate 64B packet. And it only happens with two
> > >> vhost-user ports in same server. If the pktgen is running in
> > >> another server,
> > then no such issue.
> > >>
> > >> We tested the lasted pktgen 3.4.6, and OVS-DPDK 2.8, with DPDK 17.11.
> > >>
> > >> We also found qemu2.8.1 and qemu2.10 have this problem, while qemu
> > >> 2.5 has no such problem. So seems like it is a compatibility issue
> > >> with pktgen/dpdk/qemu?
> > >>
> > >> Thanks.
> > >> Thx, Xuekun
> > >>
> > >> -----Original Message-----
> > >> From: users [mailto:users-bounces@dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Wiles,
> > >> Keith
> > >> Sent: Wednesday, May 03, 2017 4:24 AM
> > >> To: Gabriel Ionescu <Gabriel.Ionescu@enea.com>
> > >> Cc: users@dpdk.org
> > >> Subject: Re: [dpdk-users] Issue with Pktgen and OVS-DPDK
> > >>
> > >> Comments inline:
> > >>> On May 2, 2017, at 8:20 AM, Gabriel Ionescu
> > >>> <Gabriel.Ionescu@enea.com>
> > >> wrote:
> > >>>
> > >>> Hi,
> > >>>
> > >>> I am using DPDK-Pktgen with an OVS bridge that has two vHost-user
> > >>> ports
> > >> and I am seeing an issue where Pktgen does not look like it
> > >> generates packets correctly.
> > >>>
> > >>> For this setup I am using DPDK 17.02, Pktgen 3.2.8 and OVS 2.7.0.
> > >>>
> > >>> The OVS bridge is created with:
> > >>> ovs-vsctl add-br ovsbr0 -- set bridge ovsbr0 datapath_type=netdev
> > >>> ovs-vsctl add-port ovsbr0 vhost-user1 -- set Interface vhost-user1
> > >>> type=dpdkvhostuser ofport_request=1 ovs-vsctl add-port ovsbr0
> > >>> vhost-user2 -- set Interface vhost-user2 type=dpdkvhostuser
> > >>> ofport_request=2 ovs-ofctl add-flow ovsbr0
> > >>> in_port=1,action=output:2 ovs-ofctl add-flow ovsbr0
> > >>> in_port=2,action=output:1
> > >>>
> > >>> DPDK-Pktgen is launched with the following command so that packets
> > >> generated through port 0 are received by port 1 and viceversa:
> > >>> pktgen -c 0xF --file-prefix pktgen --no-pci \
> > >>>
> > >> --vdev=virtio_user0,path=/tmp/vhost-user1 \
> > >>>
> > >> --vdev=virtio_user1,path=/tmp/vhost-user2 \
> > >>>                               -- -P -m "[0:1].0, [2:3].1”
> > >>
> > >> The above command line is wrong as Pktgen needs or takes the first
> > >> lcore for display output and timers. I would not use -c -0xF, but
> > >> -l
> > >> 1-5 instead, as it is a lot easier to understand IMO. Using this
> > >> option -l 1-5 you are using 5 lcores (skipping lcore 0 in a 6 lcore
> > >> VM) one for Pktgen and 4 for the two ports. -m
> > >> [2:3].0 -m [4:5].1 leaving lcore 1 for Pktgen to use and I am
> > >> concerned you did not see some performance or lockup problem. I
> > >> really need to add a test for these types of problem :-( You can
> > >> just have 5 lcores for the VM, which then pktgen shares lcore 0
> > >> with Linux using
> > -l 0-4 option.
> > >>
> > >> Pktgen when requested to send 64 byte frames it sends 60 byte
> > >> payload
> > >> + 4 byte Frame Checksum. This does work and it must be in how
> > >> vhost-user is testing for the packet size. In the mbuf you have
> > >> payload size and the buffer size. The Buffer size could be 1524,
> > >> but the payload or frame size will be 60 bytes as the 4 bytes FCS
> > >> is appended to the frame by the hardware. It seems to me that
> > >> vhost-user is not looking at the correct struct rte_mbuf member
> variable in its testing.
> > >>
> > >>>
> > >>> In Pktgen, the default settings are used for both ports:
> > >>>
> > >>> -          Tx Count: Forever
> > >>>
> > >>> -          Rate: 100%
> > >>>
> > >>> -          PktSize: 64
> > >>>
> > >>> -          Tx Burst: 32
> > >>>
> > >>> Whenever I start generating packets through one of the ports (in
> > >>> this
> > >> example port 0 by running start 0), the OVS logs throw warnings similar
> to:
> > >>>
> 2017-05-02T09:23:04.741Z|00022|netdev_dpdk(pmd9)|WARN|Dropped
> > >> 1194956
> > >>> log messages in last 49 seconds (most recently, 41 seconds ago)
> > >>> due to excessive rate
> > >>>
> > >>
> >
> 2017-05-02T09:23:04.741Z|00023|netdev_dpdk(pmd9)|WARN|vhost-user2:
> > >> Too
> > >>> big size 1524 max_packet_len 1518
> > >>>
> > >>
> >
> 2017-05-02T09:23:04.741Z|00024|netdev_dpdk(pmd9)|WARN|vhost-user2:
> > >> Too
> > >>> big size 1524 max_packet_len 1518
> > >>>
> > >>
> >
> 2017-05-02T09:23:04.741Z|00025|netdev_dpdk(pmd9)|WARN|vhost-user2:
> > >> Too
> > >>> big size 1524 max_packet_len 1518
> > >>>
> > >>
> >
> 2017-05-02T09:23:04.741Z|00026|netdev_dpdk(pmd9)|WARN|vhost-user2:
> > >> Too
> > >>> big size 1524 max_packet_len 1518
> > >>>
> 2017-05-02T09:23:15.761Z|00027|netdev_dpdk(pmd9)|WARN|Dropped
> > >> 1344988
> > >>> log messages in last 11 seconds (most recently, 0 seconds ago) due
> > >>> to excessive rate
> > >>>
> > >>
> >
> 2017-05-02T09:23:15.761Z|00028|netdev_dpdk(pmd9)|WARN|vhost-user2:
> > >> Too
> > >>> big size 57564 max_packet_len 1518 Port 1 does not receive any
> packets.
> > >>>
> > >>> When running Pktgen with the -socket-mem option (e.g. --socket-mem
> > >>> 512),
> > >> the behavior is different, but with the same warnings thrown by OVS:
> > >> port 1 receives some packages, but with different sizes, even
> > >> though they are generated on port 0 with a 64b size:
> > >>> Flags:Port      :   P--------------:0   P--------------:1
> > >>> Link State        :       <UP-10000-FD>       <UP-10000-FD>
> > >> ----TotalRate----
> > >>> Pkts/s Max/Rx     :                 0/0             35136/0
> > >> 35136/0
> > >>>      Max/Tx     :        238144/25504                 0/0
> > >> 238144/25504
> > >>> MBits/s Rx/Tx     :             0/13270                 0/0
> > >> 0/13270
> > >>> Broadcast         :                   0
> 0
> > >>> Multicast         :                   0                   0
> > >>> 64 Bytes        :                   0                 288
> > >>> 65-127          :                   0                1440
> > >>> 128-255         :                   0                2880
> > >>> 256-511         :                   0                6336
> > >>> 512-1023        :                   0               12096
> > >>> 1024-1518       :                   0               12096
> > >>> Runts/Jumbos      :                 0/0
> 0/0
> > >>> Errors Rx/Tx      :                 0/0                 0/0
> > >>> Total Rx Pkts     :                   0               35136
> > >>>     Tx Pkts     :             1571584                   0
> > >>>     Rx MBs      :                   0                 227
> > >>>     Tx MBs      :              412777                   0
> > >>> ARP/ICMP Pkts     :                 0/0                 0/0
> > >>>                 :
> > >>> Pattern Type      :             abcd...             abcd...
> > >>> Tx Count/% Rate   :       Forever /100%       Forever /100%
> > >>> PktSize/Tx Burst  :           64 /   32           64 /   32
> > >>> Src/Dest Port     :         1234 / 5678         1234 / 5678
> > >>> Pkt Type:VLAN ID  :     IPv4 / TCP:0001     IPv4 / TCP:0001
> > >>> Dst  IP Address   :         192.168.1.1         192.168.0.1
> > >>> Src  IP Address   :      192.168.0.1/24      192.168.1.1/24
> > >>> Dst MAC Address   :   a6:71:4e:2f:ee:5d   b6:38:dd:34:b2:93
> > >>> Src MAC Address   :   b6:38:dd:34:b2:93   a6:71:4e:2f:ee:5d
> > >>> VendID/PCI Addr   :   0000:0000/00:00.0   0000:0000/00:00.0
> > >>>
> > >>> -- Pktgen Ver: 3.2.8 (DPDK 17.02.0)  Powered by Intel(r) DPDK
> > >>> -------------------
> > >>>
> > >>> If packets are generated from an external source and testpmd is
> > >>> used to
> > >> forward traffic between the two vHost-user ports, the warnings are
> > >> not thrown by the OVS bridge.
> > >>>
> > >>> Should this setup work?
> > >>> Is this an issue or am I setting something up wrong?
> > >>>
> > >>> Thank you,
> > >>> Gabriel Ionescu
> > >>
> > >> Regards,
> > >> Keith
> > >
> >
> > Regards,
> > Keith