DPDK usage discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Yongseok Koh <yskoh@mellanox.com>
To: "Nélio Laranjeiro" <nelio.laranjeiro@6wind.com>
Cc: Bin Huang <huangbin.mails@gmail.com>,
	users@dpdk.org, Adrien Mazarguil <adrien.mazarguil@6wind.com>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-users] mlx5 driver didn't set corresponding packet_type flag in TCP_ACK packet case
Date: Tue, 27 Mar 2018 14:12:33 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180327211021.GA16677@yongseok-MBP.local> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180327071434.bmkbwauak3dsbjtm@laranjeiro-vm.dev.6wind.com>

On Tue, Mar 27, 2018 at 09:14:34AM +0200, Nélio Laranjeiro wrote:
> Hi Bin,
> 
> On Mon, Mar 26, 2018 at 06:09:35PM +0800, Bin Huang wrote:
> > Greetings all,
> > 
> > 
> > I have run l3fwd example program using two mlx5 NIC(
> > MLNX_OFED_LINUX-4.3-1.0.1.0 ) base on DPDK 17.08 and use pktgen as
> > flowgen.
> > 
> > This demo provided by DPDK works fine in UDP case, but in pktgen TCP
> > case, l3fwd can't forward packet to nexthop port.
> > 
> > 
> > After look into function rxq_cq_to_pkt_type(), I found while handling
> > IPv4 TCP ACK packets:
> > 
> > > l4_hdr_type bits[2:0] in CQE is (100)
> > 
> > > l3_hdr_type bits[1:0] in CQE is (10)
> > 
> > 
> > It looks fine according to CQE format in
> > <Ethernet_Adapters_Programming_Manual> doc:
> > 
> > > l4_hdr_type:
> >     0 - None
> >     1 - TCP header was present in the packet
> >     2 - UDP header was present in the packet
> >     3 - TCP header was present in the packet with Empty TCP ACK
> > indication. (TCP packet <ACK> flag is set, and packet carries no data)
> >     4 - TCP header was present in the packet with TCP ACK indication.
> > (TCP packet <ACK> flag is set, and packet carries data).
> > 
> > > l3_hdr_type:
> > 
> >     00 - None
> >     01 - IPv6
> >     10 - IPv4
> > 
> > 
> > But combined l4_hdr_type and l3_hdr_type into idx, the idx would be
> > 0x12, which was not reserved in mlx5_set_ptype_type().
> > 
> > Then RTE_PTYPE_UNKNOWN would be return to caller which caused
> > sub-sequence procedure going wrong.
> > 
> > 
> > Did I omit any possible configuration to make ptype flag work for TCP
> > ACK packets, or should I add (*p)[0x12] in mlx5_set_ptype_type() to
> > make this work?
> 
> According to the mlx5_set_ptype_table(), the index of the array is a
> little more complex:
> 
>  /*
>   * The index to the array should have:
>   * bit[1:0] = l3_hdr_type
>   * bit[4:2] = l4_hdr_type
>   * bit[5] = ip_frag
>   * bit[6] = tunneled
>   * bit[7] = outer_l3_type
>   */
> 
> If in the CQE the other three fields are 0, your hypothesis is correct
> and index 0x12 should be filled.
> 
> Can you also check it?

When I changed it to the current array-based conversion, I followed the use of 
MLX5_CQE_RX_TCP_PACKET [1], but it looks Bin is right. A packet should be
identified as TCP packet if l4_hdr_type is 1, 3 or 4.

Bin, will you send out a patch for it or shall I?
I'd love to see a patch from you. :-)


[1] http://dpdk.org/browse/dpdk/commit/?id=ea16068c00647fb6c7fe8704d8ad2adff6bf378f

Thanks,
Yongseok

  reply	other threads:[~2018-03-27 21:13 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-03-26 10:09 Bin Huang
2018-03-27  7:14 ` Nélio Laranjeiro
2018-03-27 21:12   ` Yongseok Koh [this message]
2018-03-28  2:51     ` Bin Huang

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20180327211021.GA16677@yongseok-MBP.local \
    --to=yskoh@mellanox.com \
    --cc=adrien.mazarguil@6wind.com \
    --cc=huangbin.mails@gmail.com \
    --cc=nelio.laranjeiro@6wind.com \
    --cc=users@dpdk.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).