From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-pf1-f177.google.com (mail-pf1-f177.google.com [209.85.210.177]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8DECA4C9D for ; Fri, 31 Aug 2018 22:07:59 +0200 (CEST) Received: by mail-pf1-f177.google.com with SMTP id k19-v6so6000936pfi.1 for ; Fri, 31 Aug 2018 13:07:59 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=networkplumber-org.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=DLq6RRwO/xs1ldr7ToPyZrHXT/eDPNnQjqUgtyqrHrc=; b=hQhsaGCHJsOHn7hzsw79+qTdo3iqjkNFeRW37Y4bBl2m2b5LCSS6avabMw8EeKwuc7 HWLyGJpestynDvVLzJWDqqtQUYidyciqCIxR961tk/snJR5Bb7jAj10ApuCmh3spSyUr fijD3rrZpp+dFJHbbs2C1GHhh2DCiE6ThZ6O8TcjBhxfHz/zqF+U4/xZs0nTkn60o/Wd UIFHdPXI6xWs/KpwddbrunvYw0jH8gNfpx6VQDUEErgJgAFbjU7BOX0l93usHV+4gAFX 0ty95CUF1td7XNCHdEx4jfci8sUVVd7EDLVo1IYaFnmeAGvYnYtnx50zOSEJKsxScgLv /WTA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:in-reply-to :references:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=DLq6RRwO/xs1ldr7ToPyZrHXT/eDPNnQjqUgtyqrHrc=; b=b6rdRrQKtnDevYGpi3Z+FEcWx5X4akBNAnPFDrc3136cG3TgIjZBqRGVrST0v3yRGj 13tDljdcni8qCWy365qMv6GQx+6KULUnbT46kubwY17OoWJBmNQJNf2GNjagh7eOeOls YoYXaf2UdKLP31REEpQYdTyT4vB1VxUd5NIjw9pnjYoH2KafjgC4gmS0lN9CjfWR3dPf CwjEz4jfqLTD/79IWj/H5HndL0KXVCJPiqB9m5VKjQKVtmjvltrLMX5CUMUa2BnOqqh8 Dm1wrdxyLPvd0nWZ9JUtnmUNJHq8EMH46GnjFdZqECFVXrehfV+rpMq6gLhzp5ywg/Sq YLfw== X-Gm-Message-State: APzg51CGegKOrnBcTFhcXvn5NoXaiM3JXugjpMtrorziDv1v+ll/AZao ZROn3j00gMlEWTd7sE0llXmHag== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ANB0VdZ2UD1a8H0ayyBNGe+sJUv596FE9CikR98iVPkJkqZMHskBZ+h9q9CWOHu0CUtA6zQU0HcTMQ== X-Received: by 2002:a63:b507:: with SMTP id y7-v6mr1332240pge.425.1535746078691; Fri, 31 Aug 2018 13:07:58 -0700 (PDT) Received: from xeon-e3 (204-195-22-127.wavecable.com. [204.195.22.127]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id n83-v6sm19160716pfk.19.2018.08.31.13.07.58 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-CHACHA20-POLY1305 bits=256/256); Fri, 31 Aug 2018 13:07:58 -0700 (PDT) Date: Fri, 31 Aug 2018 13:07:56 -0700 From: Stephen Hemminger To: waqas ahmed Cc: users@dpdk.org Message-ID: <20180831130756.135f1a3b@xeon-e3> In-Reply-To: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [dpdk-users] Frame Check Sequence is incorrect? X-BeenThere: users@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK usage discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 31 Aug 2018 20:08:00 -0000 On Fri, 31 Aug 2018 23:19:38 +0500 waqas ahmed wrote: > Hi Everyone, > i have kvm with two ports, i am getting rtp stream from port 0 and just > change source ip of each packet and recalculate ipv4 checksum. then same > pkt mbuf is got rte_eth_tx_burst from port1. > but on vm2 wireshark shows that Frame check sequence is incorrect, that > seems that while getting same mbuf out from port1 cant get FCS > recalculated? by emulated nic. > kind regards and any help is appreciated. almost all nic's inside a hypervisor do not support getting FCS. FCS is used when transferring data over physical wires, and really makes no sense in a virtual environment.