From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from dpdk.org (dpdk.org [92.243.14.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 44C7AA0613 for ; Tue, 30 Jul 2019 14:25:44 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [92.243.14.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EE8B51C10E; Tue, 30 Jul 2019 14:25:43 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mail-wr1-f68.google.com (mail-wr1-f68.google.com [209.85.221.68]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7F2591C10A for ; Tue, 30 Jul 2019 14:25:42 +0200 (CEST) Received: by mail-wr1-f68.google.com with SMTP id z1so65527962wru.13 for ; Tue, 30 Jul 2019 05:25:42 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=6wind.com; s=google; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=ItIh7r6f6a6X6jHISOK7ytyAsODniFRlQSUtGe7iaVk=; b=b+wl5rp+gIPcJ9OgJZkY5QgrZ+sJ649N1DSzKI+77/KwS/bb9qOZvge3G8ve2Ck5La DNFCVMUbWss6K8pwGF7VMMTNXwpfH9xIZSr5jYm7B2z4QE7rr1itxNpBqrMAVfyT9Xbf E+c4PlbpgvA9x3PTpcQPeP/YdbfMPP5xD6ZazRcSZ5AxbP5sVi/m5cdp7x6Ck38BhFof NShReK0fGJTgGzAzq7wmRTU3kvu0hVt8SXE3giKIDfG1W8JrMz2nlUjOvwuPapbhWtmf dxJicPjw+46fqv18yAfe/UqtLlCV5ezLCBkmChD8LEMitcLJRChMIKaAaSmtAk6LXQ3L Cp9A== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=ItIh7r6f6a6X6jHISOK7ytyAsODniFRlQSUtGe7iaVk=; b=RTWOCaZW1zus6EQcvywrS8F7zUorspsRMO0eFyO9ZTmz3FP+z95MBF2ninw1uJGO8u SUb4pm+LFtiBwIm7gfaI6QSfP7rs2qafnTV5i9VReeyRfKFPCkOJ0c+u1V717kijxFmr RZ3B1syCmKDUXyISBaOXJ232tHeEIV9y5hFORejeOsbuIAy/+J2PsrqZt+msJn58/jOq BdRH/Ma0PD5533957sni0OZURJfAAFmUxLqVDAiaUolsgzXWDYhVdVd732DSikLWGfft 70rANSjvIrU23o1WCREjE6MPan1nGvFhgef/2vxExgvtmBZp6xyu9MVFX/FMeuEn/TAu kD2g== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAURYYY+J77FpUhLvML/MaulSsY+HjMDLuT8qT54TQQEV8vgB6eS 9iXiIbT0cagGMCH6Oik7VNZ7aA== X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqwV9IIx3bGghPPf3xz5G76LFc8f/u4SwbY7ojQyBKUPEuh1NnXa0UBeSpRWxgrn1YHsBY5BSw== X-Received: by 2002:adf:f204:: with SMTP id p4mr8459690wro.317.1564489542310; Tue, 30 Jul 2019 05:25:42 -0700 (PDT) Received: from 6wind.com (host.78.145.23.62.rev.coltfrance.com. [62.23.145.78]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id f2sm61057507wrq.48.2019.07.30.05.25.41 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 30 Jul 2019 05:25:41 -0700 (PDT) Date: Tue, 30 Jul 2019 14:25:39 +0200 From: Adrien Mazarguil To: Hideyuki Yamashita Cc: Ye Xiaolong , "users@dpdk.org" Message-ID: <20190730122539.GD4512@6wind.com> References: <20190722124809.GC102705@intel.com> <20190723152636.9A24.17218CA3@ntt-tx.co.jp_1> <20190730193738.8EBB.17218CA3@ntt-tx.co.jp_1> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20190730193738.8EBB.17218CA3@ntt-tx.co.jp_1> Subject: Re: [dpdk-users] Why flow can not be created? X-BeenThere: users@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK usage discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: users-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "users" On Tue, Jul 30, 2019 at 07:37:38PM +0900, Hideyuki Yamashita wrote: > Hello, > > Does anybody whether PMD other than i40e support > VID+dstMAC matching? > > It is very hard for me to read all PMD code for just to know > the support of VID+dstMAC as matching pattern. > > Somebody, please help me. Unfortunately right now trial & error using testpmd is the most effective approach to determine whether specific combinations are supported by any given NIC. Ideally doc/guides/nics/features.rst [1] should document each rte_flow feature reflected in doc/guide/nics/features/*.ini for individual PMDs [2], but that list is currently too incomplete to be useful. Now to answer your question, although those are likely not the only ones, I know from experience that both mlx4 and mlx5 support flow rules matching VID + dst MAC simultaneously. [1] http://doc.dpdk.org/guides/nics/features.html [2] http://doc.dpdk.org/guides/nics/overview.html -- Adrien Mazarguil 6WIND