From: Stephen Hemminger <email@example.com> To: Archit Pandey <firstname.lastname@example.org> Cc: email@example.com, firstname.lastname@example.org, Gokul Bargaje <email@example.com>, "Mohit P. Tahiliani" <firstname.lastname@example.org>, Tarun Anand <email@example.com>, Sanjana Krishnam <firstname.lastname@example.org>, "Avinash ." <email@example.com>, Leslie Monis <firstname.lastname@example.org> Subject: Re: [dpdk-users] [dpdk-dev] Queue Management Support in DPDK Date: Wed, 29 Jul 2020 12:07:14 -0700 Message-ID: <email@example.com> (raw) In-Reply-To: <CANtWViMLg3ArDhdj8q+VYst1_UHErD1K9CudNBoMTc+4V+Gv8g@mail.gmail.com> On Thu, 30 Jul 2020 00:07:29 +0530 Archit Pandey <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote: > Hello everyone, > > We have been using DPDK's QoS framework over the last year and found > that rte_sched and the provided qos_sched app work great for QoS. > > However, when we ventured into trying to add CoDel (to replace RED) as > a dropper to the framework, we faced several challenges due to how > tightly rte_sched and rte_red were coupled together. As we had no > success with rte_sched, we would like to propose a new framework for > queue management in DPDK. > > Goals we have in mind for the framework: > - Act as an abstraction for queue management algorithms (AQMs) such as > CoDel, PiE and RED. > - Make it easy for new algorithms to be added. > > We’d appreciate feedback on whether such a framework would be welcomed > in the community, or what else could be done for adding queue > management support. > > Sincerely, > Archit Pandey. rte_sched is not a generic AQM mechanism. You will have to write a new replacement for rte_sched if you want something else. I would recommend starting with Cake. It is latest and most complete and the developers are active and friendly.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-07-29 19:07 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2020-07-29 18:37 [dpdk-users] " Archit Pandey 2020-07-29 19:07 ` Stephen Hemminger [this message] 2020-08-02 9:42 ` [dpdk-users] [dpdk-dev] " Archit Pandey 2020-08-02 16:53 ` Jon Loeliger
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --email@example.com \ --firstname.lastname@example.org \ --email@example.com \ --firstname.lastname@example.org \ --email@example.com \ --firstname.lastname@example.org \ --email@example.com \ --firstname.lastname@example.org \ --email@example.com \ --firstname.lastname@example.org \ --email@example.com \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
DPDK usage discussions This inbox may be cloned and mirrored by anyone: git clone --mirror https://inbox.dpdk.org/users/0 users/git/0.git # If you have public-inbox 1.1+ installed, you may # initialize and index your mirror using the following commands: public-inbox-init -V2 users users/ https://inbox.dpdk.org/users \ firstname.lastname@example.org public-inbox-index users Example config snippet for mirrors. Newsgroup available over NNTP: nntp://inbox.dpdk.org/inbox.dpdk.users AGPL code for this site: git clone https://public-inbox.org/public-inbox.git