From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from dpdk.org (dpdk.org [92.243.14.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F1954A04AF for ; Wed, 19 Aug 2020 20:11:46 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [92.243.14.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3D5C314581; Wed, 19 Aug 2020 20:11:46 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mail-pl1-f169.google.com (mail-pl1-f169.google.com [209.85.214.169]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C6DA32C02 for ; Wed, 19 Aug 2020 20:11:44 +0200 (CEST) Received: by mail-pl1-f169.google.com with SMTP id h2so792485plr.0 for ; Wed, 19 Aug 2020 11:11:44 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=networkplumber-org.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=aduSKHuoS7fnlaV9co+Me51BkTTial0ddYS8ZAqXvu8=; b=nxIc6p9Ba3W/60nfJLIOXHwxLhtqbekvvAfJrAfOu8I+a6Zu6o9vx/ZZKaAWsASmRK /0/id9r4Fl3vYorp57w6IMDSs58g0+MYWp9d9MEa+auJu0cdps1pwmNyx9vSnm6/u1lI 9xNd+WPr9Cttg7+FdAkbJEFgQR272Sz9O/JWMHeMTkTC46YjQ+9xvg2phWrWVV4RcvXC q5sZ3n1kgva8oD4aHnjmR2iVfL29p9ZNvgEcTIrPvaVjdkQqFVN6wU5cPzfGoagqVjjJ 3fu9xoEGjrqE7EvlxJeOxW9ipv46kZN3lPejd4stJwB8kfdoYDZ//qrNSX7Avf9vOKj/ +p7w== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:in-reply-to :references:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=aduSKHuoS7fnlaV9co+Me51BkTTial0ddYS8ZAqXvu8=; b=ksjghcgGAY7+VjPOixPgdzXjjKOjfp2j5ZDal3YG5XJTWbCu1vCrspiL6Yuj4OJG6i oyNoZmU0yFkALEWSuGi1KcAbZ9LC7IGhVF1WSSu5qd/QHNuylo6fuCuhVRvEOLioxIAQ +VpmcPD7B8NlDG6A1uJ6m9YphPML//mGCca0Ur9P4u/A7VoABh/jz//oMaEEXOin4uRk ZBuu2sKBr/2BpO6egLmZ6y+ZIH+Rfniwlaop9z1g5kpIihxsdFLZyoZzVb92qLps1Hr0 bpE12EYW6Hfv44xFMcdInPc4SwVObTiDJSQOwRCE1NJkvOj6LPDFODKBzW2GJQFgzG6l Dhkw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532cgfPikzQthO5ZvMwPwlDlFarqllrieHisR3gj43T8ALJa+7Rn +PFWzDf4T3pgvCaOaQYMg3U4GQ== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzfxXQwDoAkaRkfaehw/yCDvmIQ1M7ZVh7q/qeQzLl0e7uJZNuV4Ue+q2DxoTtALV/iaa7cCg== X-Received: by 2002:a17:90a:5884:: with SMTP id j4mr2860888pji.217.1597860703641; Wed, 19 Aug 2020 11:11:43 -0700 (PDT) Received: from hermes.lan (204-195-22-127.wavecable.com. [204.195.22.127]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id t28sm25804828pgn.81.2020.08.19.11.11.43 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Wed, 19 Aug 2020 11:11:43 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 19 Aug 2020 11:11:35 -0700 From: Stephen Hemminger To: Liwu Liu Cc: "users@dpdk.org" Message-ID: <20200819111135.2428eaaa@hermes.lan> In-Reply-To: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [dpdk-users] TX fails for Intel 550 and 710 PMD on Hyper-V guests X-BeenThere: users@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK usage discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: users-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "users" On Wed, 19 Aug 2020 17:42:46 +0000 Liwu Liu wrote: > Hi Team, > My DPDK project uses Intel 550 and 710 virtual functions PMD under Windows Hyper-V environment. > Somehow I found out that the VM guest has TX side failing to send out any frame-I guess Windows host side turns on > Malicious Device Detection feature, for which DPDK PMD's refuse to work with. Though Intel 520 PMD works well.. My questions: > > (1) Has anyone succeeded to drive Intel 550/710 PMD under Hyper-V environment? Have not tried those NIC's. Have tried other Intel NIC. You should check that reported PCI id values match those in DPDK table. For other Intel cards, the VF in Hyper-V has different than VF in other systems. > (2) Do we have any way to turn of MDD on Windows host side, or any other walk-around solution? > Many thanks and best regards, > Liwu