From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mails.dpdk.org (mails.dpdk.org [217.70.189.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 846E544096 for ; Wed, 22 May 2024 09:21:53 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mails.dpdk.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0F553400D7; Wed, 22 May 2024 09:21:53 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mail-lf1-f46.google.com (mail-lf1-f46.google.com [209.85.167.46]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 666E5400D6 for ; Wed, 22 May 2024 09:21:51 +0200 (CEST) Received: by mail-lf1-f46.google.com with SMTP id 2adb3069b0e04-5241b49c0daso4072255e87.0 for ; Wed, 22 May 2024 00:21:51 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20230601; t=1716362510; x=1716967310; darn=dpdk.org; h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:references:in-reply-to :message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date:from:to:cc:subject:date :message-id:reply-to; bh=R5liVNhYH5zY6P2TFCAuxvSwNA+YmP33QU26DdQe7bQ=; b=cRF02V4wevqSv2+pkzZTg11M8Q3HfrfiZ5eKyCzkCSkrfq6LLNL4y3OITcMFf8CCZq 6h876MkH1hyVtmx00Oy0S1o3E1q4W3C6Nv+vP61fCXeI6Z5u4xMZuSIWLhdGPk5tdfZ1 HNL5GReEIhBEEKGsCE81sVIsYZnBWsezMwL+rSWu9Ncj0jukZSEET6k/9j5PPbYS0Hdf zFQC57fZERaklQ6HMqWtq/tZyfw61mZrJ/QZLP5x7u9c4ivyH4Ltg7NMCNJ4LFkE918F tGjQSp0TMI+lBa+a5QDYmB22AqPD2y0sLhVYwcaNF2PdbfnOCP11zfAlgksJbSACDXqO K8hw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1716362510; x=1716967310; h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:references:in-reply-to :message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc :subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=R5liVNhYH5zY6P2TFCAuxvSwNA+YmP33QU26DdQe7bQ=; b=ENfY4UxUEUeaAzwLrPfbEMi1IjdUzUyy/nxc/myD88aGkRRfU2vCcSwimiLuPqXCS5 D8cAhO624T7bQOu9ok1EmjjqwA4DTOFYuaEJ0xXfpe63NauwXuD0gVNxBt0m61DPkYXq WAxcQrIdEsRGxP0V0f4Cwp642/K0C1qPz7GrOoGAk1kivib2RREVDJL82AhLH5C3xZH3 tUQ+hkK2VLjY8PTdGRWHnb3NHAVBOicD7fSDUPgNZPfqMxhxCBgn0DTwNWrWLBOZCUag U6s4stEfqxwhi+ozrddqT79QNaiyPwmqMpE7uIVTm4Bxx2NwXS3kiechd/ZREBrlHsrP YWzg== X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YxdvoOZlK4DgbC2H6YL1udTHAsaD4U64JZmihqdpORc6N2owVnD 016cC8xdX4NtzUtHwFIXrgYlQ8elAt0CJSIwfCcYt3bl8wX4MXvo X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IHYWa8zCnU3JtfZfQKNlGYYHThKFL+mVAAEzeRFdVhCgFsCMjna3UWQSEteJEj/8ZCXIx8YGw== X-Received: by 2002:ac2:531a:0:b0:51d:3fa4:e997 with SMTP id 2adb3069b0e04-526bf545fb8mr756182e87.33.1716362510103; Wed, 22 May 2024 00:21:50 -0700 (PDT) Received: from sovereign (broadband-109-173-110-33.ip.moscow.rt.ru. [109.173.110.33]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id 2adb3069b0e04-521f38d8c2csm4890535e87.227.2024.05.22.00.21.49 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Wed, 22 May 2024 00:21:49 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 22 May 2024 10:21:48 +0300 From: Dmitry Kozlyuk To: Antonio Di Bacco Cc: users@dpdk.org Subject: Re: Request to map PCI device in a secondary that uses the --block for that device Message-ID: <20240522102148.0db4d9b6@sovereign> In-Reply-To: References: X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.18.0 (GTK+ 2.24.33; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: users@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK usage discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: users-bounces@dpdk.org 2024-05-22 08:46 (UTC+0200), Antonio Di Bacco: > Is it correct that a primary requests a secondary to map a device that > the secondary explicitly blocks with the --block arg ? > > IN my case this requests of mapping creates a crash in the secondary. > > Using DPDK 21.11 > > Best regards, > Antonio. Hi Antonio, "Secondary processes which requires access to physical devices in Primary process, must be passed with the same allow and block options." https://doc.dpdk.org/guides/prog_guide/multi_proc_support.html