From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from dpdk.org (dpdk.org [92.243.14.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 88CC0A2E1B for ; Wed, 4 Sep 2019 11:18:23 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [92.243.14.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 743BE1ED39; Wed, 4 Sep 2019 11:18:23 +0200 (CEST) Received: from out1-smtp.messagingengine.com (out1-smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.25]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A7BD81ED36 for ; Wed, 4 Sep 2019 11:18:21 +0200 (CEST) Received: from compute1.internal (compute1.nyi.internal [10.202.2.41]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4351421E92; Wed, 4 Sep 2019 05:18:21 -0400 (EDT) Received: from mailfrontend2 ([10.202.2.163]) by compute1.internal (MEProxy); Wed, 04 Sep 2019 05:18:21 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=monjalon.net; h= from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:content-transfer-encoding:content-type; s=mesmtp; bh=q9Faj77lwhmSHGSX4YXm5K273nqBCKf4KhlfDwGUeNg=; b=ry0iZz/+U5TS WNxh41r6YBP4qBrdPkvZutim+iGMA2B8oViLB98GVlJIVevNkpfVFQ4ApfAv77mf SurabDYJ9P5qfW8o1kfj2sNvbZV2xUtbZlQbQiYUP45ijaePEpoTPMrBNUw1VuwM zpF11NRZiMB2GlfDQJsFzt/4E5blsvk= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type :date:from:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references :subject:to:x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender :x-sasl-enc; s=fm3; bh=q9Faj77lwhmSHGSX4YXm5K273nqBCKf4KhlfDwGUe Ng=; b=lbRzXS+1GjWIBBqa1w9QcpKtdcGTGtqrV5PA++a8FjMaVH9C7RVdQgwCI AyN+RzeIok3csvq8ya+HlGdq1UoyEyjEIFDd2W32f0Af1MBxAp0QIWpdJ+7JH5zD 26GSqzNr3q6Pu7RqVdXJ1s9SUvlOax6xYavlDsIWnh8gmE4iapfQh6YomBcE6SQF Ztyx+2uY28pz/SN9AU82XcjXBmODcoXKsXv9gt9Oa4DDCiLh1ao1cqC0YihTJzcR Gp8WDklIjlrXB0RvwhepxeB75X/2rT7ltqEj+dTKjpuZjAspD7b8iTsIzGaF6ArY xMCxvGLzkDdfxohk+WLGevyJPtsVg== X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgeduvddrudejhedgudefucetufdoteggodetrfdotf fvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuhfgrshhtofgrihhlpdfqfgfvpdfurfetoffkrfgpnffqhgen uceurghilhhouhhtmecufedttdenucesvcftvggtihhpihgvnhhtshculddquddttddmne cujfgurhephffvufffkfgjfhgggfgtsehtufertddttddvnecuhfhrohhmpefvhhhomhgr shcuofhonhhjrghlohhnuceothhhohhmrghssehmohhnjhgrlhhonhdrnhgvtheqnecukf hppeejjedrudefgedrvddtfedrudekgeenucfrrghrrghmpehmrghilhhfrhhomhepthhh ohhmrghssehmohhnjhgrlhhonhdrnhgvthenucevlhhushhtvghrufhiiigvpedu X-ME-Proxy: Received: from xps.localnet (184.203.134.77.rev.sfr.net [77.134.203.184]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 5451DD60057; Wed, 4 Sep 2019 05:18:20 -0400 (EDT) From: Thomas Monjalon To: Greg O'Rawe Cc: users@dpdk.org, "chas3@att.com" Date: Wed, 04 Sep 2019 11:18:19 +0200 Message-ID: <2276096.qs0m2Os3LV@xps> In-Reply-To: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Subject: Re: [dpdk-users] devargs syntax to use MAC address for bond slaves X-BeenThere: users@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK usage discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: users-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "users" 19/08/2019 17:56, Greg O'Rawe: > Hi, > > Thanks for the reply. Is such a patch to the bonding PMD feasible? Probably yes. You can try to do it, and work with Chas for help.