From: Thomas Monjalon <thomas.monjalon@6wind.com>
To: users@dpdk.org
Cc: raman geetha gopalakrishnan <glowingsun@gmail.com>,
Nikhil Nanal <nanal@usc.edu>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-users] Reg PMD & NIC
Date: Wed, 08 Mar 2017 11:03:50 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <2518649.J6V2U7E2e8@xps13> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CABAuC==r4idvoH-y4gjwp+B1fDy3ehcrRMTyuFqH2WmqOORykA@mail.gmail.com>
You will find a list of supported NICs in the documentation:
http://dpdk.org/doc/nics
There are many NIC vendors.
The overview of the current feature support is also in the documentation:
http://dpdk.org/doc/guides/nics/overview.html
2017-03-08 13:10, raman geetha gopalakrishnan:
> Hi Nikhil,
>
> Can i say that NIC's are not standardized to work in same way, rather PCI
> to discover its capabilities are standardized?
>
> Thanks
> Raman
>
> On Wed, Mar 8, 2017 at 12:41 PM, Nikhil Nanal <nanal@usc.edu> wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > I guess DPDK works only for Intel NICs. Also, there are a variety of NIC
> > cards from Intel.
> > The drivers are generally specific to a NIC card or a family of NIC cards.
> > The DPDK, replaces the existing NIC drivers with its PMD drivers, , but
> > these PMDs are
> > only compatible with some specified class of Intel NIC cards and so there
> > are only some supported NICs but not all.
> >
> > thanks
> > Nikhil
> >
> > > On Mar 7, 2017, at 11:05 PM, raman geetha gopalakrishnan <
> > glowingsun@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > Hi All,
> > >
> > > I have the following basic question. Hope to get an answer / link where i
> > > can get myself clear.
> > >
> > > 1. In DPDK PMD is optimized driver for an given NIC to get maximum
> > > performance.
> > > That being the case why we are talking about DPDK supported NICs.
> > >
> > > A) My assumption is that NIC interface is standardized so that PMD
> > > should actually work with any NIC (barring some NIC specific performance
> > > tweaks)
> > > is that correct?
> > >
> > > B) if #A is correct , how can i make changes to PMD to support any
> > NIC
> > > ?
> > >
> > >
> > > Thanks
> > > Raman
> >
> >
prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-03-08 10:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-03-08 7:05 raman geetha gopalakrishnan
2017-03-08 7:11 ` Nikhil Nanal
2017-03-08 7:40 ` raman geetha gopalakrishnan
2017-03-08 10:03 ` Thomas Monjalon [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=2518649.J6V2U7E2e8@xps13 \
--to=thomas.monjalon@6wind.com \
--cc=glowingsun@gmail.com \
--cc=nanal@usc.edu \
--cc=users@dpdk.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).