DPDK usage discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Thomas Monjalon <thomas.monjalon@6wind.com>
To: "De Lara Guarch, Pablo" <pablo.de.lara.guarch@intel.com>
Cc: users@dpdk.org, Rob Zimmerman <rob@thezims.net>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-users] Is Elastic Flow Distributor thread-safe?
Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2017 15:26:45 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <2559373.u8yrGXqafe@xps13> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <E115CCD9D858EF4F90C690B0DCB4D897476DA027@IRSMSX108.ger.corp.intel.com>

2017-02-14 14:14, De Lara Guarch, Pablo:
> From: Rob
> >   Playing around with EFD and seeing some really bizarre behavior in a
> > multi-core environment. Is it safe for multiple logical cores to be making
> > EFD table updates while another logical core is performing lookups? Side
> > note: the core which is making lookups is where the offline table resides.
> > 
> > Intuition tells me this is probably not safe, but the docs make no mention
> > of thread safety.
> 
> The library is not thread-safe. The only operation that is thread safe is the lookup.
> 
> However, although update is not thread safe, it is interesting to know the following.
> Updating the EFD table consists of two steps:
> 
> 1 - Compute Update: the new key is added to the offline group, which is not thread safe.
>      Then, a new perfect hash for the group is computed (thread safe and where most of time is spent).
> 
> 2 - Apply Update: Once the update is computed, it has to be applied to the online table (fast, but not thread safe).
> 
> Multi-writer support might be added in the future, as it was added in the Hash library.
> 
> For now, several readers can work simultaneously, as long as there is no writer working on it (you would need locks for this),
> and only a single writer is supported if there is no other core doing lookups.

Should it be added to the documentation?

  parent reply	other threads:[~2017-02-14 14:26 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-02-13 14:26 Rob Zimmerman
2017-02-14 14:14 ` De Lara Guarch, Pablo
2017-02-14 14:23   ` Rob Zimmerman
2017-02-14 14:26   ` Thomas Monjalon [this message]
2017-02-14 14:38     ` De Lara Guarch, Pablo

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=2559373.u8yrGXqafe@xps13 \
    --to=thomas.monjalon@6wind.com \
    --cc=pablo.de.lara.guarch@intel.com \
    --cc=rob@thezims.net \
    --cc=users@dpdk.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).