From: "Ananyev, Konstantin" <konstantin.ananyev@intel.com>
To: Victor Huertas <vhuertas@gmail.com>,
"longtb5@viettel.com.vn" <longtb5@viettel.com.vn>
Cc: "dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>, "users@dpdk.org" <users@dpdk.org>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-users] [dpdk-dev] Suggestions on how to customize the metadata fields of each packet
Date: Fri, 23 Feb 2018 09:27:17 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <2601191342CEEE43887BDE71AB97725890577301@irsmsx105.ger.corp.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAGxG5cgk=s3CD0i4y+UXK8me2AGSad=b9GXdszBRnMZ9w0p3JQ@mail.gmail.com>
Hi Victor,
>
> Thanks for your quick answer,
>
> I have read so many documents and web pages on this issue that probably I
> confounded the utility of the headroom. It is good to know that this 128
> bytes space is available to my disposal. The fact of being lost once the
> NIC transmits the frame it is not a problem at all for my application.
> However, in case that this space is not enough, I have seen in the rte_mbuf
> struct a (void *) pointer called userdata which is in theory used for extra
> user-defined metadata. If I wanted to attach an additional metadata struct,
> I guess that I just have to assign the pointer to this struct to the
> userdata field. However, what happens if I want that the content of this
> struct travels with the packet through a software ring in order to be
> processed by another thread? Should I reserve more space in the ring to
> allocate such extra metadata?
>
> Thanks again,
In theory headroom inside mbuf should be left for packet's data.
To do things properly you'll need to create your mbuf mempools with
priv_size >= your_extra_metadata_size.
Konstantin
>
> PD: I have copied the message to users mailing list
>
> 2018-02-23 4:13 GMT+01:00 <longtb5@viettel.com.vn>:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > First, I think your question should be sent to the user mailing list, not
> > the dev mailing list.
> >
> > > I have seen that each packet has a headroom memory space (128 bytes
> > long)
> >
> > > where RSS hashing and other metadata provided by the NIC is stored.
> >
> > If I’m not mistaken, the headroom is not where metadata provided by the
> > NIC are stored. Those metadata are stored in the rte_mbuf struct, which
> > is also 128 bytes long.
> >
> > The headroom area is located AFTER the end of rte_mbuf (at offset 128).
> > By default the headroom area is also 128 byte long, so the actual packet
> > data is stored at offset 256.
> >
> > You can store whatever you want in this headroom area. However those
> > information are lost as soon as the packet leaves DPDK (the NIC will start
> > sending at offset 256).
> >
> > -BL.
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Victor
prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-02-23 9:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-02-23 8:12 [dpdk-users] " Victor Huertas
2018-02-23 9:27 ` Ananyev, Konstantin [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=2601191342CEEE43887BDE71AB97725890577301@irsmsx105.ger.corp.intel.com \
--to=konstantin.ananyev@intel.com \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
--cc=longtb5@viettel.com.vn \
--cc=users@dpdk.org \
--cc=vhuertas@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).