From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from dpdk.org (dpdk.org [92.243.14.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3E748A0577 for ; Tue, 14 Apr 2020 12:12:35 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [92.243.14.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8F1631C1E9; Tue, 14 Apr 2020 12:12:34 +0200 (CEST) Received: from wout4-smtp.messagingengine.com (wout4-smtp.messagingengine.com [64.147.123.20]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A38EF1C1E7 for ; Tue, 14 Apr 2020 12:12:33 +0200 (CEST) Received: from compute7.internal (compute7.nyi.internal [10.202.2.47]) by mailout.west.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 65063D6A; Tue, 14 Apr 2020 06:12:31 -0400 (EDT) Received: from mailfrontend2 ([10.202.2.163]) by compute7.internal (MEProxy); Tue, 14 Apr 2020 06:12:31 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=monjalon.net; h= from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:content-transfer-encoding:content-type; s=mesmtp; bh=uvsGkgDeUYnsKD/vYeU6J8sfO5bL4IDWRkNqvfbyvAs=; b=dYylVSwFaKlp SINFVaDvgw7o5svN++ghmthydqVctUnnHyIww22Ue2OtoV1sIgjEgEtFB+djNJ1j HJ8RNAuhhFBelJNwmyLVlpEFcxfWEp0ywSeCrqwq3FuOkBIX+SerUljzGkEyuzBs 2s1lInctVE49n9qcVn2q1tfDw7yrogw= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type :date:from:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references :subject:to:x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender :x-sasl-enc; s=fm2; bh=uvsGkgDeUYnsKD/vYeU6J8sfO5bL4IDWRkNqvfbyv As=; b=tXNkwCjPFPnOlNBSlCSgypvNv0ajy9kUZm0JklPO1vOSJLpmrraIgJuaE xdIvzXwoEls5MkWqesXHwn62hoKqzQcSfvn0Z6VR/dQapsMr6vDvWf1hAeCyGWrj 2Dx4dAIlZT4MrhbT55nsTyOffzU7I55B0BMAT5iTYmlaLW528PVAI+QvI6sTYvtJ YV1Sal1HonZuRYyw5LBhwSKLiq81CebRZsuLNTukkGLSeIMguPNRIb3hMCbL07me OkZfqIBghPYUw6RoLD06QPZirocVmKFOywlRItWUzCYfcZYL4aqK3EjgHWh8Owqd NCCrneBZYSKSxIzXT8LEu5C3peahg== X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgeduhedrfedugddvhecutefuodetggdotefrodftvf curfhrohhfihhlvgemucfhrghsthforghilhdpqfgfvfdpuffrtefokffrpgfnqfghnecu uegrihhlohhuthemuceftddtnecusecvtfgvtghiphhivghnthhsucdlqddutddtmdenuc fjughrpefhvffufffkjghfggfgtgesthfuredttddtvdenucfhrhhomhepvfhhohhmrghs ucfoohhnjhgrlhhonhcuoehthhhomhgrshesmhhonhhjrghlohhnrdhnvghtqeenucffoh hmrghinhepughpughkrdhorhhgnecukfhppeejjedrudefgedrvddtfedrudekgeenucev lhhushhtvghrufhiiigvpedtnecurfgrrhgrmhepmhgrihhlfhhrohhmpehthhhomhgrsh esmhhonhhjrghlohhnrdhnvght X-ME-Proxy: Received: from xps.localnet (184.203.134.77.rev.sfr.net [77.134.203.184]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id ECF71306005C; Tue, 14 Apr 2020 06:12:29 -0400 (EDT) From: Thomas Monjalon To: Yan Lei Cc: "users@dpdk.org" Date: Tue, 14 Apr 2020 12:12:28 +0200 Message-ID: <3126416.8hzESeGDPO@thomas> In-Reply-To: <2cb8c79c6e0a4829996f7a3b56386e89@epfl.ch> References: <2cb8c79c6e0a4829996f7a3b56386e89@epfl.ch> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Subject: Re: [dpdk-users] [mlx5 + DPDK 19.11] Flow insertion rate less than 4K per sec X-BeenThere: users@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK usage discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: users-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "users" Hi, 10/04/2020 20:11, Yan Lei: > I am doing some study that requires inserting more than 1 million flow > rules per second to the NIC. And I runs DPDK 19.11 on a ConnectX-5 NIC. > > But I only managed to create around 3.3K rules per second. > Below is the code I used to measure the insertion rate: Please could you review this new application designed for such measure? https://patches.dpdk.org/patch/68058/ Any feedback about the above patch is welcome. Feel free to try and review it.