From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <kiselev99@gmail.com>
Received: from mail-wm0-f45.google.com (mail-wm0-f45.google.com [74.125.82.45])
 by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 27FA21D9E
 for <users@dpdk.org>; Tue, 22 May 2018 12:42:38 +0200 (CEST)
Received: by mail-wm0-f45.google.com with SMTP id f8-v6so32212664wmc.4
 for <users@dpdk.org>; Tue, 22 May 2018 03:42:38 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025;
 h=date:from:message-id:to:subject:mime-version
 :content-transfer-encoding;
 bh=dyOFOEq7yu9DO/6+vTKCWHfPCN6OUXvbhUTjr99cpmg=;
 b=KvvpIuYng+kc2a+4UTZrr9H494jnMpMGUuwAvgi+iOkh8bn/8gSSNjNEjxBazwFr3B
 iF8OcmRvgHSyvJEfb4O3B5ku+mCpgxoks8JifSD89fS+4ijKf6J+MyZc0t87z2H1h8XE
 48D5JHqk+FP+A/y/hywMCDVHa1cGoxNOQne9UDXJ2JOOFtYryFu8BDZU+LJhosWvKA8t
 YnJhzPTSo3r4DsmcmV+HTu4VKYQmXszR+H5V8q+MzK0gMVKrobVtPUixnUa+S0De8VJH
 QJ5nz08rdf9FdDJ6101EtmOFG8SYsDQ+yeJy5562M8GTOaY79dWBYD64DVOft6cB+zad
 xr0Q==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
 d=1e100.net; s=20161025;
 h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:message-id:to:subject:mime-version
 :content-transfer-encoding;
 bh=dyOFOEq7yu9DO/6+vTKCWHfPCN6OUXvbhUTjr99cpmg=;
 b=g5x1hAx9dtPw2Oxxdzl3nvMH9l0G5yk1Vz4ZtrxwQgJgUIZVgQukmPvc5vTWHtOkFP
 w7PXNpLg/9qChBcH9H8ZDb+YsH78ppraNYJnNyxnSfu9GndDA7d5kQbpQ5vSHnoBqgKx
 aKetAkM5BbHLHj+9yrL/cL4hfMKiwDWfaPR1pue89xvgKGOlZy8a8gsLaHy7sDynACDh
 flJlYd02qUmeppYhQyXD4qfTif1CFbysHsmTXUESuBOpxstR7hTSfqtHKocCLqiwDXvv
 +lGlciGfIHjQauEyuK6FiGzacSyv/D6PZPZksXtJfAWdorvYd08d9ON08Q0VLAC0bPlE
 r2+A==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALKqPwfXGliJUGy7g0DVVOi2xFeUICHvEGZEg5yo2tWNn9+AcnXtttbQ
 g+LzmB8KCHU7H0YIKUIOX7xN2UZJHts=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AB8JxZqGoo5yUp2wzPEF+zF9ishcK1heMzQnoV9FyeZi89W1Hd+Hks2bvBsHJaToeXj5MgqHX64O4A==
X-Received: by 2002:a2e:83d7:: with SMTP id
 s23-v6mr14204432ljh.34.1526985757446; 
 Tue, 22 May 2018 03:42:37 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from al ([2001:470:1f0b:1460:24e6:3555:bcec:4a36])
 by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id 141-v6sm1691788lfz.88.2018.05.22.03.42.36
 (version=TLS1_1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128/128);
 Tue, 22 May 2018 03:42:36 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Tue, 22 May 2018 13:42:28 +0300
From: Alex Kiselev <kiselev99@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <351944790.20180522134228@gmail.com>
To: users@dpdk.org, Beilei Xing <beilei.xing@intel.com>, 
 Qi Zhang <qi.z.zhang@intel.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: [dpdk-users] problem with an additional MAC address on i40e
X-BeenThere: users@dpdk.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: DPDK usage discussions <users.dpdk.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://dpdk.org/ml/options/users>,
 <mailto:users-request@dpdk.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/users/>
List-Post: <mailto:users@dpdk.org>
List-Help: <mailto:users-request@dpdk.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://dpdk.org/ml/listinfo/users>,
 <mailto:users-request@dpdk.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 22 May 2018 10:42:38 -0000

Hi.

I am facing an issue trying to receive packets destined to the 
MAC address ipv4_mcast_12 01:00:5E:00:00:12. 

The problem is that once I add to a port additional MAC address 00:00:5E:00:01:0A 
using rte_eth_dev_mac_addr_add(), the port stop receiving packets destinated 
to the address 01:00:5E:00:00:12. When there is no additinal mac on a port 
everything is ok. Also, there is no such issue when I am using intel X520 nic (ixgbe),
I am facing this behavior only with X710 (i40e) intel NIC.

DPDK ver dpdk-stable-17.11.1


--
Alex Kiselev.