From: "Wiles, Keith" <keith.wiles@intel.com>
To: "Avi Cohen (A)" <avi.cohen@huawei.com>
Cc: "users@dpdk.org" <users@dpdk.org>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-users] OVS vs OVS-DPDK
Date: Wed, 24 May 2017 13:23:22 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <365623D9-223D-4A37-ACB7-73599B4E163C@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <B84047ECBD981D4B93EAE5A6245AA361013BCC2E@FRAEML521-MBX.china.huawei.com>
> On May 24, 2017, at 3:29 AM, Avi Cohen (A) <avi.cohen@huawei.com> wrote:
>
> Hello
> Let me ask it in a different way:
> I want to understand the reasons for the differences in performance between OVS-DPDK and standard OVS My setup is: ovs/ovs-dpdk is running @ host communicating with a VM
>
> OVS-DPDK
> 1. packet is received via physical port to the device.
>
> 2.DMA transfer to mempools on huge-pages allocated by dpdk-ovs - in user-space.
>
> 3. OVS-DPDK copies this packet to the shared-vring of the associated guest (shared between ovs-dpdk userspace process and guest)
>
> 4. guest OS copies the packet to userspace application on VM .
>
> Standard OVS
>
> 1. packet is received via physical port to the device.
>
> 2.packet is processed by the OVS and transferred to a virtio device connected to the VM - whar are the additional overhead here ? QEMU processing - translation , VM exit ?? other ?
>
> 3. guest OS copies the packet to userspace application on VM .
>
>
> Question: what are the additional overhead in the standard OVS that cause to poor performance related to the OVS-DPDK setup ?
> I'm not talking about the PMD improvements (OVS-DPDK) running on the host - but on overhead in the VM context in the standard OVS setup
The primary reasons are OVS is not using DPDK and OVS is using the Linux kernel as well :-)
>
> Best Regards
> avi
Regards,
Keith
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-05-24 13:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-05-24 8:29 Avi Cohen (A)
2017-05-24 13:23 ` Wiles, Keith [this message]
2017-05-24 13:51 ` Avi Cohen (A)
2017-05-25 9:03 ` Avi Cohen (A)
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=365623D9-223D-4A37-ACB7-73599B4E163C@intel.com \
--to=keith.wiles@intel.com \
--cc=avi.cohen@huawei.com \
--cc=users@dpdk.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).