From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-wm0-f50.google.com (mail-wm0-f50.google.com [74.125.82.50]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1C5A12C24 for ; Mon, 20 Feb 2017 14:10:40 +0100 (CET) Received: by mail-wm0-f50.google.com with SMTP id c85so78798031wmi.1 for ; Mon, 20 Feb 2017 05:10:40 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=6wind-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:user-agent:in-reply-to :references:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=94/L0pQ9dIt4VD17IxqMEohK9JZmFmgtbpnalRISWaQ=; b=AIBJIWk08rwGxHyx4QeZw3l6VZN9dfhcfNDTv2pqCfKyseAJoJYDPmg4+n0ri2Ione 1YCQMs9xd3kTNwd/X9Yfxlms9iFqJgqTgd7GX1nGLrjBDJ16i8kE35U6h+1al/SkcEqN TdQyw96kT/Du51r+b3FZPxp3lw65U2xx2rLroEuRBO8wxiSeleQNlGUq8tGpqPi4B6bc Z0Ri+gh6wi3PPG+0LY3bJ9m81kZTLPCtMY9yRmbnpMK89VGmWjeFxUFxBAwxkzMO/4Xx Njsou2LJFhcIZzNr+qxYgjOjUJKfNHV8S3Nh+XZGc9FuKDX1HqGymxlOeCwaW0Cg8bHh FWig== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:user-agent :in-reply-to:references:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=94/L0pQ9dIt4VD17IxqMEohK9JZmFmgtbpnalRISWaQ=; b=TwWqEbLfZK7GRelzOFkAIPr2YFTp8d350O+Qu/zNQEy6OjGp6W2JNsgaLmm0k5GHr2 BunEkAXVFLrfF1ZgPby2gOF+NZcpu9o812eQNUkylYo+ahnEufzq9yTqCM3E1XWxXYo/ 6mj6Nb/JJC7bCg023mkBSO5sMGE8Eno4J21iX/2qOtzHI+IEqLliGuo3OeiD+RQv/dBg mDABkb1mXqT53wZh+KHXEOnILGaryeQ7lWp5nle+bEnTq31i4zT+jaPNlAD92YLJk+d9 Nw56c88wTvFnRNQTbKJkHA6x/v7JXo861sTUMDuL5UqrsAIYio5FapLA82QTN3S510dH SD0w== X-Gm-Message-State: AMke39m/JdtEJWT94EQZ59TWs8ngPyCSxJpY3e6BWUbfgJDV9+jIAyyPpov9OdafdondIwIT X-Received: by 10.28.102.67 with SMTP id a64mr20121571wmc.140.1487596240761; Mon, 20 Feb 2017 05:10:40 -0800 (PST) Received: from xps13.localnet (184.203.134.77.rev.sfr.net. [77.134.203.184]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id y65sm13438023wmb.5.2017.02.20.05.10.39 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 20 Feb 2017 05:10:40 -0800 (PST) From: Thomas Monjalon To: "Trahe, Fiona" Cc: dev@dpdk.org, Pankaj Joshi , users@dpdk.org Date: Mon, 20 Feb 2017 14:10:39 +0100 Message-ID: <5068483.Xs10W06zQs@xps13> User-Agent: KMail/4.14.10 (Linux/4.5.4-1-ARCH; KDE/4.14.11; x86_64; ; ) In-Reply-To: <348A99DA5F5B7549AA880327E580B4358918EF1F@IRSMSX101.ger.corp.intel.com> References: <348A99DA5F5B7549AA880327E580B4358918EF1F@IRSMSX101.ger.corp.intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Subject: Re: [dpdk-users] [dpdk-dev] Problem running dpdk-qat example in SR-IOV mode X-BeenThere: users@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK usage discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 20 Feb 2017 13:10:41 -0000 2017-02-20 11:53, Trahe, Fiona: > From: Pankaj Joshi > > > > Hello All, > > > > I am trying to run dpdk-qat example code in SR-IOV mode. Steps done by me > > so far are : > > The dpdk-qat example app is an earlier mechanism of wrapping a QAT driver into DPDK - it's not using the cryptodev API, and depends on both a kernel driver and user-space libs from a QAT package. > Unless you have a really good reason for using this (like you wanted to use the older Cave Creek device) I would recommend you use the cryptodev API. Could we remove this obsolete example?