From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-wm0-f49.google.com (mail-wm0-f49.google.com [74.125.82.49]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DFDA8C5D6 for ; Sat, 20 Feb 2016 13:27:14 +0100 (CET) Received: by mail-wm0-f49.google.com with SMTP id g62so104924560wme.0 for ; Sat, 20 Feb 2016 04:27:14 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=6wind-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=subject:to:references:cc:from:organization:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=hPPyAf0KjwiXlUSxkd0WpgbpxMFtw/oKN1I9hiK8Yhg=; b=coDCGdeF/aUKtFZGjmI8OrItDjHeLdFH/oBWtRH/NwxY8e3EO5yzlTiv2LoeP42gOU r8lto8V9IqJTfjRoNbJKAsdOsEhMv5a6y7QJsONGBc0YMoL0zPIj0L6b28Rr/LqABqMu d5rAG2wyNXK8zp/UGNE2gfg/akrMFqRvBY0dcnq/ymhu2OaVlb8SEDVLXJD3VzQjhB12 iQU5X29JdDb6xn+NFe++ITMeFxBTtYJGz7iCZ1Zkm4WpLUV/+KcQ/zQ1rgD7ltSM8qxL JmPsy9juK5hzInQD5RE+Rh+a1kbfHFbfg/Zkc30JGZL5vaFncK/VYqauwgbGkXwUTXk6 JWSQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:references:cc:from:organization :message-id:date:user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=hPPyAf0KjwiXlUSxkd0WpgbpxMFtw/oKN1I9hiK8Yhg=; b=I6rI2Ad/u9u6GN7GabphV40dQYnuM0YSplzB6cvbcOo99mslJU0aC903qZybcYNnTt 8aABBV0ccFvfAooRtmBSDJwsl1H//FN7d9CJMMlDkV2B6nzwbuC+XC6QrXDINK05IPOg Li5CqMCoWf+8OW+hKJfubSM0XNhyMatIggkmoc4fNKnTAxu+CAIIrosAH3Erx85Nmnr2 jYlGkcBRHDoDdRbHD67Zowqfxp5NsP254vNRBfvGGmmkLmzAvIAQeTN84mIXQrszp6/t PsV6KDtmceNxg29OmSXD6s5c3L4vT0rBvTyJ8PLqSZg8ukBup1KzkFwUhp03diEbYhtG EtgQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AG10YOR+HrQRyA2xO/YTQ68KvcCpUU9xNI/qO71Y1UivjZ3veYUuMbgcUzjwUw+yqvoM9nPf X-Received: by 10.28.12.80 with SMTP id 77mr2385580wmm.19.1455971234663; Sat, 20 Feb 2016 04:27:14 -0800 (PST) Received: from ?IPv6:2a01:e35:8a8e:1b70:3c40:1166:a9fe:f115? ([2a01:e35:8a8e:1b70:3c40:1166:a9fe:f115]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id c136sm11839142wmd.3.2016.02.20.04.27.13 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Sat, 20 Feb 2016 04:27:13 -0800 (PST) To: Thomas F Herbert , "users@dpdk.org" References: <56C77084.6090901@redhat.com> From: Vincent JARDIN Organization: www.6wind.com Message-ID: <56C85B99.5060700@6wind.com> Date: Sat, 20 Feb 2016 13:27:05 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.5.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <56C77084.6090901@redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: "dev@dpdk.org" Subject: Re: [dpdk-users] [dpdk-dev] snapshot for 2.2.0 problem? X-BeenThere: users@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: usage discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 20 Feb 2016 12:27:15 -0000 Thomas, > I am not sure if anyone has noticed yet this but is the dpdk snapshot > bad today? can you check again? For 2 download: $ md5sum dpdk-2.2.0*gz 22e2fd68cd5504f43fe9a5a6fd6dd938 dpdk-2.2.0 (1).tar.gz 22e2fd68cd5504f43fe9a5a6fd6dd938 dpdk-2.2.0.tar.gz tar tvzf is ok too. Thanks for the notice, Vincent