From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <therbert@redhat.com>
Received: from mail-qg0-f48.google.com (mail-qg0-f48.google.com
 [209.85.192.48]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 19EBF5323
 for <users@dpdk.org>; Mon, 22 Feb 2016 01:28:37 +0100 (CET)
Received: by mail-qg0-f48.google.com with SMTP id b67so100947292qgb.1
 for <users@dpdk.org>; Sun, 21 Feb 2016 16:28:37 -0800 (PST)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
 d=1e100.net; s=20130820;
 h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:references:cc:from:message-id:date
 :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-type
 :content-transfer-encoding;
 bh=weXTAEfKgbZOLKIZDWy6qLOawilp5O5Bi6l9rs/ukrE=;
 b=h3lPLxL6HkMrhFHhE2nyMXYznB52GHaUR6algE+JqJ4pea2Eg9dJRLxn4FbMXuTQny
 yQ6BGDdpywtpmtMuGgqitZQ96Cnlc02IY9wZ1+mQoNrLpSz+hoRaMJ/i6tr8w6gxU9qO
 U3uKkp3wBOYglmVnLtjaeAW23ncGSA+dpSF1s//5MeA7qGGtu9dZG3LvcrTkRLQvcxmz
 bfhaPDjhglPzmu7gVTJSa1KeZ+wsXuZTcSwFLPb2Nn1eHDL7udiGd403hkBSX90HfdL/
 gDFyyIjOzx0ct9xcljYrQE1nFGgPuhUygjaTc9WTxY2c56sUolPaCp9zEBdYmjUXShuZ
 RjnQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AG10YOS9oAXQEUXqDjVkhOuuXNbyzzntjbX5SuUQDVVvL/ZX1rS4sMzvqBRCGhVUkM/X92NL
X-Received: by 10.140.16.225 with SMTP id 88mr31612300qgb.96.1456100916550;
 Sun, 21 Feb 2016 16:28:36 -0800 (PST)
Received: from tfherb-2.local (pool-173-53-26-105.rcmdva.fios.verizon.net.
 [173.53.26.105])
 by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id g130sm9286279qkb.28.2016.02.21.16.28.35
 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER);
 Sun, 21 Feb 2016 16:28:36 -0800 (PST)
To: Vincent JARDIN <vincent.jardin@6wind.com>, "users@dpdk.org"
 <users@dpdk.org>
References: <56C77084.6090901@redhat.com> <56C85B99.5060700@6wind.com>
From: Thomas F Herbert <therbert@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <56CA5632.3070009@redhat.com>
Date: Sun, 21 Feb 2016 19:28:34 -0500
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.10; rv:38.0)
 Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.5.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <56C85B99.5060700@6wind.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: "dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-users] [dpdk-dev] snapshot for 2.2.0 problem?
X-BeenThere: users@dpdk.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: usage discussions <users.dpdk.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/options/users>,
 <mailto:users-request@dpdk.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/users/>
List-Post: <mailto:users@dpdk.org>
List-Help: <mailto:users-request@dpdk.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/listinfo/users>,
 <mailto:users-request@dpdk.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 22 Feb 2016 00:28:37 -0000



On 2/20/16 7:27 AM, Vincent JARDIN wrote:
> Thomas,
>
>> I am not sure if anyone has noticed yet this but is the dpdk snapshot
>> bad today?
>
> can you check again?
Thanks, it was a networking problem. Maybe the shasums could be 
published along with the snapshots?
>
> For 2 download:
>
> $ md5sum dpdk-2.2.0*gz
> 22e2fd68cd5504f43fe9a5a6fd6dd938  dpdk-2.2.0 (1).tar.gz
> 22e2fd68cd5504f43fe9a5a6fd6dd938  dpdk-2.2.0.tar.gz
>
> tar tvzf is ok too.
>
> Thanks for the notice,
>   Vincent
>