[dpdk-users] users Digest, Vol 67, Issue 1

[dpdk-users] users Digest, Vol 67, Issue 1

[Gyanesh Patra]

The compilation went fine. Thank you.

But i am unable to attach any onboard network interface. 

dpdk-devbind.py  status is:

0002:01:00.1 'Device a034' if=enP2p1s0f2 drv=thunder-nicvf unused=nicvf,vfio-pci 

Bind error:

Enter PCI address of device to bind to VFIO driver: 0002:01:00.1

Error: bind failed for 0002:01:00.1 - Cannot bind to driver vfio-pci

Error: unbind failed for 0002:01:00.1 - Cannot open /sys/bus/pci/drivers//unbind

Similar error when tried with an PCIe based intel x520 interface too:

status:

0009:90:00.0 '82599ES 10-Gigabit SFI/SFP+ Network Connection' if=enP9p144s0f0 drv=ixgbe unused=vfio-pci 

error:

Enter PCI address of device to bind to VFIO driver: 0009:90:00.0

Error: bind failed for 0009:90:00.0 - Cannot bind to driver vfio-pci

Error: unbind failed for 0009:90:00.0 - Cannot open /sys/bus/pci/drivers//unbind

Thanks,

P Gyanesh Patra

On Mon, 23 Jan 2017 at 09:00 users-request@dpdk.org <
mailto:users-request@dpdk.org
> wrote:

a, pre, code, a:link, body { word-wrap: break-word !important; }

Send users mailing list submissions to
mailto:users@dpdk.org
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
http://dpdk.org/ml/listinfo/users
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
mailto:users-request@dpdk.org
You can reach the person managing the list at
mailto:users-owner@dpdk.org
When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific

than "Re: Contents of users digest..."

Today's Topics:

1. DPDK installation on cavium ThunderX SoC (Gyanesh Patra)

2. Re: DPDK installation on cavium ThunderX SoC (Thomas Monjalon)

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Message: 1

Date: Sun, 22 Jan 2017 19:18:42 -0800

From: "Gyanesh Patra" <
mailto:pgyanesh.patra@gmail.com
>

To: "
mailto:users@dpdk.org
" <
mailto:users@dpdk.org
>, "
mailto:users-request@dpdk.org
"

<
mailto:users-request@dpdk.org
>

Subject: [dpdk-users] DPDK installation on cavium ThunderX SoC

Message-ID: <
mailto:588574ecd41d1200008a129d@polymail.io
>

Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8

Hi,

What is the proper method to install DPDK on a ThunderX SoC?

Does it work with onboard NICs or externally added PCIe based only?

I faces problem while trying to install dpdk (16, 17 & master):-

?>>make config T=arm64-thunderx-linuxapp-gcc

/bin/sh: 1: aarch64-thunderx-linux-gnu-gcc: not found

/bin/sh: 1: aarch64-thunderx-linux-gnu-gcc: not found

/bin/sh: 1: test: -lt: unexpected operator

/bin/sh: 1: aarch64-thunderx-linux-gnu-gcc: not found

/bin/sh: 1: aarch64-thunderx-linux-gnu-gcc: not found

How to fix this problem??

System info:

Cavium ThunderX SoC (model - R150-T62)

gcc-6.3.0

Ubuntu 16.06 LTS

P Gyanesh Patra

------------------------------

Message: 2

Date: Mon, 23 Jan 2017 09:34:42 +0100

From: Thomas Monjalon <
mailto:thomas.monjalon@6wind.com
>

To: Gyanesh Patra <
mailto:pgyanesh.patra@gmail.com
>

Cc:
mailto:users@dpdk.org
,
mailto:jerin.jacob@caviumnetworks.com
Subject: Re: [dpdk-users] DPDK installation on cavium ThunderX SoC

Message-ID: <5031028.LIyTN9g4Jb@xps13>

Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"

Hi,

2017-01-22 19:18, Gyanesh Patra:

> Hi,

>

> What is the proper method to install DPDK on a ThunderX SoC?

>

> Does it work with onboard NICs or externally added PCIe based only?

>

> I faces problem while trying to install dpdk (16, 17 & master):-

>

> ?>>make config T=arm64-thunderx-linuxapp-gcc

>

> /bin/sh: 1: aarch64-thunderx-linux-gnu-gcc: not found

>

> /bin/sh: 1: aarch64-thunderx-linux-gnu-gcc: not found

>

> /bin/sh: 1: test: -lt: unexpected operator

>

> /bin/sh: 1: aarch64-thunderx-linux-gnu-gcc: not found

>

> /bin/sh: 1: aarch64-thunderx-linux-gnu-gcc: not found

>

> How to fix this problem?

>

> System info:

>

> Cavium ThunderX SoC (model - R150-T62)

>

> gcc-6.3.0

>

> Ubuntu 16.06 LTS

I think you need to add CROSS= on your command line to unset the

default CROSS value (aarch64-thunderx-linux-gnu-).

We should remove this default value in DPDK.

End of users Digest, Vol 67, Issue 1

************************************
From zain2294@gmail.com  Fri Jan 27 10:41:58 2017
Return-Path: <zain2294@gmail.com>
Received: from mail-qt0-f179.google.com (mail-qt0-f179.google.com
 [209.85.216.179]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AD022201
 for <users@dpdk.org>; Fri, 27 Jan 2017 10:41:58 +0100 (CET)
Received: by mail-qt0-f179.google.com with SMTP id v23so123158544qtb.0
 for <users@dpdk.org>; Fri, 27 Jan 2017 01:41:58 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s 161025;
 h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to
 :cc; bh=X7LHL2I+ElPuZGRJp0Fey3cpxCuJ5UGvrvD++dmifJM=;
 b=b/4ygxWTrs//OW6T8D+GovgjcWPXMu+G5N+XAkaTn2D1L9uUFguktncttbTD2EvGP7
 3z3eANUJmtToF9w5aKG4yXfwqIJwXgsa+8TM5rPvQHosBcDqkOREFg42nobqwU7h3QcM
 D9WQrp3/zJrsDr3jvt7E0462LgjsAqZpGsf0Tcfzgvsrijp0ZHh1BuX3Nnm94BFJuCtJ
 TO1JGy9VrZaaXOWbMmxwXfs4+SyQugsiIYlpaJwkat9pF8+LHY4DFqIhTyo/1EeCUTqz
 g1otL+g/UjYKFwSaQJ7FV8TxzrXiBVqt8TILimsfnb4rFEfeJL0sL4CEodT3RnorAQeI
 65fw=X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
 d\x1e100.net; s 161025;
 h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date
 :message-id:subject:to:cc;
 bh=X7LHL2I+ElPuZGRJp0Fey3cpxCuJ5UGvrvD++dmifJM=;
 b=KJtzuOAGy7GWNlN95VK6R51JbnRmW3QPtoj9ei6Q2oC51+rRGPi+LRoFWKvSVnRVKE
 Hw6W/oCFTl75aNAmxuXEZUvdi/ptRmrBxrizrRKCCPeXEk90b+oKp7LR9wdY8pK5Lcyd
 WGgA6WTeB6v2mWOyGKIVkQJHB5DkD1imHwfiagyO3BW8w+xbO+VguGRJ+/IcnRTCWkiF
 1LF+KdNh7KC+pJMruhwW1+5UGEng50aXpFQBHm3xKtPMACsKLBwNsw7GuyjMb6rRRK2E
 78KYNXMRLyzgv74zJ7Vof/U3OFhbcMlYpnLQg32mh+iDb9EI2P95mNuaqeElKKjij9sM
 JH+Q=X-Gm-Message-State: AIkVDXJW3kXE2lBdDToL+wP6wTKECY4n7v8Nv+4cfe6EpABfLdxjsF5dl7vejluJFuXIjY1uOhmSnE0tcLe2IQ=X-Received: by 10.55.170.17 with SMTP id t17mr7076370qke.15.1485510118029;
 Fri, 27 Jan 2017 01:41:58 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.12.140.131 with HTTP; Fri, 27 Jan 2017 01:41:57 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <CACn717ip7Cv26MSTy4JeE9iX=HvFU-5CtR3fvubakd5ER4FLGg@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CACn717ip7Cv26MSTy4JeE9iX=HvFU-5CtR3fvubakd5ER4FLGg@mail.gmail.com>
From: Muhammad Zain-ul-Abideen <zain2294@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 27 Jan 2017 14:41:57 +0500
Message-ID: <CAN7yQ2oiTW0uOFDMo-d_RG-h+jmYDoNNF3E8r3GMUAWWovDiwg@mail.gmail.com>
To: Shirley Avishour <shirley@imvisiontech.com>
Cc: users <users@dpdk.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Subject: Re: [dpdk-users] drops while transmitting to the kni using
	rte_kni_tx_burst()
X-BeenThere: users@dpdk.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: DPDK usage discussions <users.dpdk.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/options/users>,
 <mailto:users-request@dpdk.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/users/>
List-Post: <mailto:users@dpdk.org>
List-Help: <mailto:users-request@dpdk.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/listinfo/users>,
 <mailto:users-request@dpdk.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 27 Jan 2017 09:41:58 -0000

Please can you share the pipeline model of your later design, and what
hardware is being used