From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <yogesh.purohit@altencalsoftlabs.com>
Received: from mail.altencalsoftlabs.com (mail.altencalsoftlabs.com
 [122.15.76.200]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F026C2C6E
 for <users@dpdk.org>; Tue,  4 Apr 2017 15:46:16 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by mail.altencalsoftlabs.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D79BA442003A
 for <users@dpdk.org>; Tue,  4 Apr 2017 19:16:15 +0530 (IST)
Received: from mail.altencalsoftlabs.com ([127.0.0.1])
 by localhost (mail.altencalsoftlabs.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10032)
 with ESMTP id X2CGSkJTfppM for <users@dpdk.org>;
 Tue,  4 Apr 2017 19:16:15 +0530 (IST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by mail.altencalsoftlabs.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7B4E7442003C
 for <users@dpdk.org>; Tue,  4 Apr 2017 19:16:15 +0530 (IST)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.9.2 mail.altencalsoftlabs.com 7B4E7442003C
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
 d=altencalsoftlabs.com; s=selector; t=1491313575;
 bh=oCdiPH//TVuc86ImGMwioWE9e/yBuLMG3oj1uTdcEIQ=;
 h=Message-ID:Date:From:MIME-Version:To:Subject:Content-Type;
 b=ktWJ2w7dIRqRSylnw4n2UW78J45Y08S5w7pZsw7pFiqWDiJK2BwdK6LK1qQM11+3f
 OjZ+nYcbRT7tCLZdquVndWWhtrqm8W5XBS/Z29YfOhrMKC1DmH3GUZ78efuElbrVTO
 2yaypvyBSnFbVBcvlHCWdO4nYTViZEgAooKke/5c=
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at altencalsoftlabs.com
Received: from mail.altencalsoftlabs.com ([127.0.0.1])
 by localhost (mail.altencalsoftlabs.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10026)
 with ESMTP id S_DEGG6R2rc2 for <users@dpdk.org>;
 Tue,  4 Apr 2017 19:16:15 +0530 (IST)
Received: from [172.23.103.208] (unknown [182.75.25.29])
 by mail.altencalsoftlabs.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 563F0442003A
 for <users@dpdk.org>; Tue,  4 Apr 2017 19:16:15 +0530 (IST)
Message-ID: <58E3A3A3.2010600@altencalsoftlabs.com>
Date: Tue, 04 Apr 2017 19:16:11 +0530
From: yogesh purohit <yogesh.purohit@altencalsoftlabs.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64;
 rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.4.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: users@dpdk.org
References: <58E3A283.9020100@altencalsoftlabs.com>
In-Reply-To: <58E3A283.9020100@altencalsoftlabs.com>
X-Forwarded-Message-Id: <58E3A283.9020100@altencalsoftlabs.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.15
Subject: [dpdk-users] query related to DPDK-16.04  multi-process
X-BeenThere: users@dpdk.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: DPDK usage discussions <users.dpdk.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/options/users>,
 <mailto:users-request@dpdk.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/users/>
List-Post: <mailto:users@dpdk.org>
List-Help: <mailto:users-request@dpdk.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/listinfo/users>,
 <mailto:users-request@dpdk.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 04 Apr 2017 13:46:17 -0000

  Hi,

    I am working on developing multiple DPDK-fastpath applications which 
would work as client-server model with some alterations over example of 
DPDK.

I would receive packet by Server application process it and pass it to 
client application and then return it to server. Server would be having 
complete control for packet Rx and Tx from the ports.

Can I have *multiple cores for running server application* and *each 
server application core can be binded with one client core* to it ??

Thanks & Regards,
Yogesh