From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from dpdk.org (dpdk.org [92.243.14.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BD5BCA04B0 for ; Tue, 25 Aug 2020 02:42:25 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [92.243.14.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 02CA31C07B; Tue, 25 Aug 2020 02:42:25 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mail-pf1-f170.google.com (mail-pf1-f170.google.com [209.85.210.170]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8F55F1C002 for ; Tue, 25 Aug 2020 02:42:22 +0200 (CEST) Received: by mail-pf1-f170.google.com with SMTP id x25so5947699pff.4 for ; Mon, 24 Aug 2020 17:42:22 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language; bh=AWyPffT+lHtldbWI2yimQOZBKHka3SvHxBU+8Dxb7cM=; b=sGiwhndGYYwoyoblTbI/pGniOf+oxTuIDRosnY4mumXg1MVsUs7N6ZDPrgTCHBTZNv gFynbBVIDekmdGsnuMBUSCzraphpZCD+vZ77hO4ws2Xapo7aC/Oe0AkRdy5ac6LF5vA4 lFFWOczoSnEejub1unl89FbE+GPqiXzk05kI+iFL9eQ5l7/Ahnif6GQxNX2IAEHcfEae MV1KW2Re+/r3IlL1UOOonxW7lZ1nGe3QINmgZu3nBaiW2gkUwmu+SCP0Ow2xcq3UIMup 8MiDeAsQwGhoTMnMNz3xUQjiKraTsz+nIJYJToHcooOC+vnEZ07LwIT+aV9rdk0MpUZ9 54DQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language; bh=AWyPffT+lHtldbWI2yimQOZBKHka3SvHxBU+8Dxb7cM=; b=DUh2npAisaA+yUdfbW3c2J4Q3iey61v7olX80FJoZg3NK3kWzFxXCMp45uRwqnYQUw F4qksDy17PurSampF6g6L00dig0KKmhDcwpIK9Ku6RlI8OmWtrNVfy62kdPO6O6Bpj5m QSSvYitk+Ni9j/ANMW71SgB1u89xt0HpFf0Y7hFocraslcgiuLDxDNzDmlXG5D9wX6eV tME8v/A6JDxkM/OK1iA8ygxqB2uRwrl4ZuXgzgI2QVgZC0wCA0tqw/PwkoN4IHkdDQpo XKMYy8JmLnhEf8OveP5Am0nIm4U8ewW7zpLskBFb96IR6w2wzjF2cBxDjy8nSn98Tdsn MSXQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531Nv7p3hhVckBTbqqkM9j5YBG/dHy8Bf87r5NaszRtB3Y1XkDgj 7d1KUX/jrMb4gxnI7l3E/9rdO+WQRQlgqbWY X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJy85Vo31HzgQbsN9KypVs9hn2DKu4UHH5jjeguSBq2KSgiSp+/TmZOap3SqMWoxOswAVEiTgg== X-Received: by 2002:a63:c04c:: with SMTP id z12mr5251243pgi.220.1598316141111; Mon, 24 Aug 2020 17:42:21 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ?IPv6:2406:3003:2005:20c2:74c5:461:4673:5a01? ([2406:3003:2005:20c2:74c5:461:4673:5a01]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id x14sm12316412pfj.157.2020.08.24.17.42.19 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 24 Aug 2020 17:42:20 -0700 (PDT) To: Erez Ferber Cc: users@dpdk.org References: <767cf587-90b4-2eab-bd0d-667b862b50e8@gmail.com> From: Alireza Sanaee Message-ID: <6de96a98-c4c8-46c7-07b2-bc37922433f2@gmail.com> Date: Tue, 25 Aug 2020 08:42:19 +0800 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.10.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Language: en-US Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.15 Subject: Re: [dpdk-users] Low throughput when pushing multiple priorities within a VLAN X-BeenThere: users@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK usage discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: users-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "users" Hi, Here is my NIC,  Ethernet controller: Mellanox Technologies MT27710 Family [ConnectX-4 Lx] Thanks, Alireza On 8/25/20 3:17 AM, Erez Ferber wrote: > Hi, > > Which NIC are you using ? > > Thanks, > Erez > > On Mon, 24 Aug 2020 at 11:34 Alireza Sanaee > wrote: > > Dear all, > > > > I'd like to push two flows with two different priorities from a > NIC to > > the network. If I use same priority for my flows, they'll be > pushed at > > the line rate. However, when I pick two different VLAN priorities, > > throughput reduces drastically. > > > > Is there anything wrong with my NIC configuration? > > > > Thanks, > > Alireza > > >